Skip to main content

Opportunities of Combining Sustainable Supply Chain Management Practices for Performance Improvement

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Social and Environmental Dimensions of Organizations and Supply Chains

Part of the book series: Greening of Industry Networks Studies ((GINS,volume 5))

Abstract

Considerable efforts for research on sustainable supply chain management have become evident in the past years. Besides conceptual studies and quantitative models, empirical research on corporate practices has been contributing to promote reductions of impacts on the environment and society. The systematic combination of practices is, however, not yet approached in literature. Therefore, this chapter presents results derived from a systematic literature review based on a recently developed framework for managing sustainable supply chain practices. Through contingency analysis on the selected publications, correlations between the framework dimensions and categories enable the identification of dominating and underrepresented initiatives. Lastly, corporate reports published by five German automotive manufacturers are examined. Results show that both sustainable procurement and waste management practices are strongly correlated with a firm’s production management practices. Moreover, general issues of waste management are most often discussed in concert with distributional and customer relationship practices. In contrast, corporate governance and supplier relationship practices are implemented isolated from other initiatives. The apparent lack of integration between these practices motivated a second round of analysis, which considers 21 more specific categories. The findings are further compared to sustainability leaders’ examples to offer managerial insights and opportunities to enhance sustainable supply chain performance. This chapter focuses specifically on sustainable supply chain practices and introduces the concept of “initiative combination rent,” contributing nonetheless to further the understanding of how companies can improve supply chain and sustainability performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Accenture (2012) Why a sustainable supply chain is good business. Available in www.accenture.com/outlook. Accessed 15 Jan 2016

  • Ageron B, Gunasekaran A, Spalanzani A (2012) Sustainable supply management: an empirical study. Int J Prod Econ 140:168–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Backhaus K, Erichson B, Plinke W, Weiber R (2013) Multivariate analysemethoden: eine anwendungsorientierte einführung. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Beske-Janssen P, Johnson MP, Schaltegger S (2015) 20 years of performance measurement in sustainable supply chain management–what has been achieved? Suppl Chain Manag An Int J 20:664–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen F, Cousins P, Lamming R, Faruk A (2006) Horses for courses: explaining the gap between the theory and practice of green supply. In: Greening the supply chain (pp 151–172). Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Campos JK (2015) Integrated framework for managing sustainable supply chain practices, Schriftenr. Univ.-Verl. der TU Berlin, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbone V, Moatti V (2008) Greening the supply chain: preliminary results. Suppl Chain Forum Int J 9:66–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter CR, Dresner M (2001) Purchasing’s role in environmental management: cross-functional development of grounded theory. J Suppl Chain Manag 37:12–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter CR, Leuschner R, Rogers DS (2007) A social network analysis of the journal of supply chain management: knowledge generation, knowledge diffusion and thought leadership. J Suppl Chain Manag 43:15–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke S, Roome N (1999) Sustainable business: learning-action networks as organizational assets. Bus Strateg Environ 8:296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colicchia C, Melacini M, Perotti S (2011) Benchmarking supply chain sustainability: insights from a field study. Benchmark An Int J 18:705–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comas Martí JM, Seifert RW (2013) Assessing the comprehensiveness of supply chain environmental strategies. Bus Strateg Environ 22:339–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals CSCMP Supply Chain Management. Available via www.cscmp.org/aboutcscmp/definitions.asp. Accessed 15 Jan 2016

  • Durach CF (2016) A theoretical and practical contribution to supply chain robustness: developing a schema for robustness in dyads. Universitätsverlag der TU Berlin, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer JH, Singh H (1998) The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad Manag Rev 23:660–679

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt KM, Schoonhoven CB (1996) Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organ Sci 7:136–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington J (1999) Cannibals with forks: triple bottom line of 21st century business. Capstone Publishing Ltd, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament Directive 2000/53/EC. Available in http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/. Accessed 15 Jan 2016

  • Flotzinger CW, Hofmann-Prokopczyk H, Starkl F (2008) Future scenarios 2030–the impact on logistics and the contribution to a sustainable development. In: Logist. Spectr. http://research.fh-ooe.at/files/publications/912_Futurescenarios.pdf. Accessed 10 Sept 2015

  • Gold S, Seuring S, Beske P (2010) Sustainable supply chain management and inter-organizational resources: a literature review. 245:230–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Handfield R, Straube F, Pfohl H-C, Wieland A (2013) Trends and strategies in logistics and supply chain management. DVV Media, Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardisty PE (2010) Environmental and economic sustainability. CRC Press, Baton Rouge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harris LC, Crane A (2002) The greening of organizational culture: management views on the depth, degree and diffusion of change. J Organ Chang Manag 15:214–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson T (2011) Prosperity without growth: economics for a finite planet. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson D, Turner C (2015) European business, 3rd edn. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiron D, Kruschwitz N, Haanaes K, von Streng VI (2012) Sustainability nears a tipping point. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 53:69–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Klassen RD, McLaughlin CP (1996) The impact of environmental management on firm performance. Manag Sci 42:1199–1214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavie D (2006) The competitive advantage of interconnected firms: an extension of the resource-based view. Acad Manag Rev 31:638–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahler D (2007) The sustainable supply chain. Suppl Chain Manag Rev 11:59–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathur SS, Kenyon A (1997) Our strategy is what we sell. Long Range Plan 30:455–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mckinsey (2008) McKinsey global survey results: economic conditions snapshot. Available in http://www.mckinsey.com/global-themes/employment-and-growth/mckinsey-global-survey-results-economic-conditions-snapshot-november-2008. Accessed 1 Mar 2016

  • Milne MJ, Adler RW (1999) Exploring the reliability of social and environmental disclosures content analysis. Account Audit Account J 12:237–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Min H, Galle WP (1997) Green purchasing strategies: trends and implications. Int J Purch Mater Manag 33:10–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Mollenkopf DA, Closs DJ (2005) The hidden value in reverse logistics. Supply Chain Manag 9:34–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuendorf KA (2002) The content analysis guidebook. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen (2014) Doing well by doing good

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagell M, Shevchenko A (2014) Why research in sustainable supply chain management should have no future. J Suppl Chain Manag 50:44–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perotti S, Zorzini M, Cagno E, Micheli GJL (2012) Green supply chain practices and company performance: the case of 3PLs in Italy. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 42:640–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer J, Salancik GR (1978) The external control of organizations: a resource dependence approach. Harper & Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Piecyk M, Björklund M (2015) Logistics service providers and corporate social responsibility: sustainability reporting in the logistics industry. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 45:459–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME (1985) Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkis J (1999) How green is the supply chain?: practice and research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seuring S, Müller M (2008) From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. J Clean Prod 16:1699–1710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava P (1995) The role of corporations in achieving ecological sustainability. Acad Manag Rev 20:936–960

    Google Scholar 

  • Szekely F, Knirsch M (2005) Responsible leadership and corporate social responsibility: metrics for sustainable performance. Eur Manag J 23:628–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tate WL, Ellram LM, Kirchoff JF (2010) Corporate social responsibility reports: a thematic analysis related to supply chain management. J Suppl Chain Manag 46:19–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teuscher P, Grüninger B, Ferdinand N (2006) Risk management in sustainable supply chain management (SSCM): lessons learnt from the case of GMO free soybeans. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 13:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN Global Compact (2013) The UN global compact-accenture CEO study on sustainability – architects of a better world. UN Glob Compact Reports 5:1–60

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2016) The Paris Agreement. Available in http://unfccc.int/paris_agreement/items/9485.php. Accessed 2 Nov 2016

  • Vachon S, Mao Z (2008) Linking supply chain strength to sustainable development: a country-level analysis. J Clean Prod 16:1552–1560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walley N, Whitehead B (1994) It’s not easy being green. Harv Bus Rev 72:46–52

    Google Scholar 

  • WCED (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Welford R (2002) Disturbing development: conflicts between corporate environmentalism, the international economic order and sustainability. In: Uttin P (ed) Green bus dev ctries rhetor reality, prospect. Zed Press, London, pp 135–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf J (2008) The nature of supply chain management research: insights from a content analysis of international supply chain management literature from 1990 to 2006. Springer Science & Business Media, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Dunn S, Forman H (2012) A study on green supply chain management practices among large global corporations. J Suppl Chain Oper Manag 10:182–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Q, Sarkis J, Geng Y (2005) Green supply chain management in China: pressures, practices and performance. Int J Oper Prod Manag 25:449–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The corresponding author gratefully acknowledges the research fund by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico – “National Counsel of Technological and Scientific Development” (Brazil) Grant 237361/2012-4.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juliana Kucht Campos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendices

1.1 Appendix 1: Descriptions of Dimensions and Categories of SSC Practices

Dimensions/categories

Description

1. Supplier development

Implement practices related to suppliers’ selection, assessment, and collaboration to improve company’s and suppliers’ performance on environmental and social outcomes

1.1. Selection

Include sustainability criteria during the supplier selection process (certifications, management systems, compliance with guidelines, code of conduct), prefer using specific group of suppliers that are more social-environmental responsible

1.2. Assessment

Communicate expectations, monitor suppliers’ performance, and ensure they meet the required objectives, using questionnaires/inspections. Evaluate indirect suppliers and penalize them in case of lack of compliance

1.3. Supplier collaboration

Collaborate with suppliers to increase SC sustainability, promote integration and information sharing, financial support for sustainability

2. Governance

Implement sustainability policies and management systems, align business operations with sustainability matters, and establish a good relationship with stakeholders

2.1. Company’s policies

Implement policies to motivate quality improvements combined with reduction of the impact on the environment and people. May include supply chain-specific policies and compliance with current regulations

2.2. Business alignment

Promote alignment between company’s strategies and sustainability issues, create formal departments/functions to manage this topic, stimulate internal communication and education

2.3. Sustainability control

Implement management systems and internal KPIs related to sustainability, manage company’s certifications and risk-safety-related issues

2.4. External relationship

Manage relationship with external stakeholders and publicize sustainability efforts

3. Procurement

Improve sustainability through changes in the procurement process, materials, and services (including packaging) that are purchased

3.1. Process

Implement improvements on the procurement process, including on contracts, in order to make it more social-environmental responsible

3.2. Materials and services

Purchase sustainable materials, components, products, and services, including those that are certified (e.g., eco-label)

3.3. Packaging

Use or design innovations on packaging in order to make them more sustainable

4. Production management

Implement practices related to the development of new solutions and management of resources

4.1. Solutions development

Design more sustainable products, processes, and services, considering the product life cycle and resource consumption

4.2. Resources

Manage resources (materials, energy, water) and invest in renewable sources

5. Distribution

Improve sustainability through adjustments in structure, network, modes of transport, new vehicles and equipment’s technologies and distribution processes

5.1. Structure and network

Implement adjustments during construction phase, facilities management, network structure, and specific distribution strategies

5.2. Modes of transport

Improve sustainability through switches on modes of transport

5.3. Equipment and vehicles

Improve sustainability through adjustments on logistics equipment and vehicles (fuel, rolling resistance, body type, maintenance, others)

5.4. Distribution processes

Implement changes in the distribution process such as inventory management (particular attention to hazardous materials) and transport optimization, improve driving skills, and use low speed driving

6. Waste management

Manage waste and pollution in order to decrease environmental, economic, and social impact

6.1. Reuse and recycle

Encourage reuse practices, including remanufacture and recycling

6.2. Waste disposal

Implement practices for disposing (not selling) waste in a correct way

6.3. Pollution control

Control, minimize, and compensate pollution

7. Customer relationship

Manage customer relationship identifying their demands and engaging them on sustainability issues

7.1. Demands

Collect information about customer demands/habits and react according to their necessities

7.2. Engagement

Engage customers actively on sustainability issues and encourage behavior changes

1.2 Appendix 2: Significant Correlations Between SSC Practices

Acronyms

Category combination

Phi coeff.

Supplier relationship

SC*GBA

Supplier Collaboration (1.3)*Business alignment (2.2)

0.329***

SC*PmS

Supplier collaboration (1.3)*Solutions development (4.1)

0.354***

Governance

GBA*GE

Business alignment (2.2)*External relationship (2.4)

0.371***

GE*DE

External relationship (2.4)*Equipment and vehicles (5.3)

0.311***

Procurement

PP*PMC

Procurement process (3.1)*Materials/services (3.2)

0.900***

PP*WPR

Procurement process (3.1)*Reuse and recycle (6.1)

0.306***

PMC*WPR

Materials/services (3.2)*Reuse and recycle (6.1)

0.302***

PPL*PMC

Packaging (3.3)*Materials/services (3.2)

0.368***

PPL*PMS

Packaging (3.3)*Solutions development (4.1)

0.368***

PPL*PME

Packaging (3.3)*Resources (4.2)

0.352***

PPL*DM

Packaging (3.3)*Transport modes (5.2)

0.338***

Production management

PmS*CE

Solutions development (4.1)*Customer engagement (7.2)

0.309***

PmE*WPR

Resources (4.2)*Reuse and recycle (6.1)

0.338***

PmE*WPW

Resources (4.2)*Waste disposal (6.2)

0.375***

PmE*WPP

Resources (4.2)* Pollution control (6.3)

0.447*

Distribution (subcategories included under “Supplier Relationship” and “Governance”)

Waste management

WPR*WPW

Reuse and recycle (6.1)*Waste disposal (6.2)

0.306***

WPP*CE

Pollution control (6.3)*Customer engagement (7.2)

0.315***

Customer relationship (subcategories included under “Production Management” and “Waste Management”)

  1. * p < = 0.050, ** p < = 0.015, and *** p < = 0.005

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Campos, J.K., Rebs, T. (2018). Opportunities of Combining Sustainable Supply Chain Management Practices for Performance Improvement. In: Brandenburg, M., Hahn, G., Rebs, T. (eds) Social and Environmental Dimensions of Organizations and Supply Chains. Greening of Industry Networks Studies, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59587-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics