Abstract
This chapter considers the rather frequent objection to Gadamer, made by Jürgen Habermas, among others, that a theory of the unreflective nature of context-dependence of the kind proposed by Gadamer reduces the very lack of reflection that it asserts. Gadamer argues that context-dependence and the presuppositions that it involves are to some extent, or perhaps even largely, unreflected. But this very argument seems to rely on a reflective stance. However, a distinction should be made between a general idea of context-dependence and reflective awareness of the specific forms of this dependence. This very idea does not require that all presuppositions are reflected. Gadamer is therefore less vulnerable to the criticism that his theory of unreflectiveness contains incompatible elements than Habermas supposes. But Gadamer sometimes argues that most contextual influences are unreflected. This argument does not rely on a general idea of context-dependence only, but requires a form of reflection that is both specific and comprehensive to succeed. When Gadamer argues in this way, Habermas’ objection to him seems valid after all.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bernstein, Richard. 1983. Beyond objectivism and relativism: Science, hermeneutics, and praxis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
———. 2003. The constellation of hermeneutics, critical theory and deconstruction. In The Cambridge companion to Gadamer, ed. Robert J. Dostal, 267–282. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bormann, Claus von. 1971. Die Zweideutigkeit der hermeneutischen Erfahrung. In Hermeneutik und Ideologiekritik, eds. Jürgen Habermas, Dieter Heinrich, and Jacob Taubes, 32–46. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Depew, David J. 1981. The Habermas–Gadamer debate in Hegelian perspective. Philosophy and Social Criticism 8: 427–446.
Descartes, René. 1986. The philosophical works of Descartes, vol. 1. Trans. John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff, and Dugald Murdoch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Giddens, Anthony. 1979. Central problems in social theory. Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. London: Macmillan.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1971. Knowledge and human interests. Trans. Jeremy R. Shapiro. Boston: Beacon Press.
———. 1988. On the logic of the social sciences. Trans. Shiery Weber Nicholsen and Jerry A. Stark. Cambridge: MIT Press.
———. 1990a. The hermeneutic claim to universality. Trans. Joseph Bleicher. In The hermeneutic tradition from Ast to Ricoeur, eds. Gail Ormiston and Alan D. Schrift, 245–272. Albany: SUNY Press.
———. 1990b. A review of Gadamer’s Truth and method. Trans. Fred R. Dallmayr and Thomas McCarthy. In The hermeneutic tradition from Ast to Ricoeur, eds. Gail Ormiston and Alan D. Schrift, 213–244. Albany: SUNY Press.
Hahn, Lewis Edwin, ed. 1997. The philosophy of Hans-Georg Gadamer. La Salle: Open Court.
Heidegger, Martin. 1996. Being and time. Trans. Joan Stambaugh. Albany: SUNY Press.
Husserl, Edmund. 1982. Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy. First Book: General introduction to a pure phenomenology. Trans. Frederick Kersten. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Kennedy Schmidt, Lawrence. 1987. The epistemology of Hans-Georg Gadamer. An analysis of the legitimization of Vorurteile. Frankfurt: Lang.
———. 2010. Critique: The heart of philosophical hermeneutics. In Consequences of hermeneutics: Fifty years after Gadamer’s Truth and method, eds. Jeff Malpas and Santiago Zabala, 202–217. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Kögler, Hans Herbert. 1996. The power of dialogue. Critical hermeneutics after Gadamer and Foucault. Cambridge: MIT Press.
McCarthy, Thomas. 1988. The critical theory of Jürgen Habermas. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Pannenberg, Wolfhart. 1986. Hermeneutics and universal history. In Hermeneutics and modern philosophy, ed. Brice R. Wachterhauser, 111–146. Albany: SUNY Press.
Pippin, Robert B. 2002. Gadamer’s Hegel. In Gadamer’s century. Essays in honor of Hans-Georg Gadamer, eds. Jeff Malpas, Ulrich Arnswald, and Jens Kertscher, 217–238. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Porter, Stanley E., and Jason C. Robinson. 2011. Hermeneutics. An introduction to interpretive theory. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans.
Risser, James. 1997. Hermeneutics and the voice of the other. Re-reading Gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics. Albany: SUNY Press.
Scheibler, Ingrid. 2000. Gadamer. Between Heidegger and Habermas. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Tate, John W. 1997. Dead or alive? Reflective versus unreflective traditions. Philosophy and Social Criticism 23: 71–91.
Veith, Jerome. 2015. Gadamer and the transmission of history. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Wachterhauser, Brice R. 1999. Beyond being. Gadamer’s post-platonic hermeneutical ontology. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Warnke, Georgia. 1987. Gadamer. Hermeneutics, tradition and reason. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Weinsheimer, Joel C. 1986. Gadamer’s hermeneutics. A reading of Truth and method. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Odenstedt, A. (2017). Forms of Reflection. In: Gadamer on Tradition - Historical Context and the Limits of Reflection. Contributions To Phenomenology, vol 90. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59558-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59558-0_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59556-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59558-0
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)