Abstract
Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA) and Environmental Risk Assessment (ERA) are well-established regulatory and scientific research fields that support regulatory decision-making in the European Union (EU) and are undergoing constant development. HHRA and ERA are crucial steps for reaching the objectives of Europe 2020, a strategy put forward by the Commission that sets out a vision of Europe’s social market economy for the twenty-first century. This chapter aims to describe the basic principles, the evolution and the future challenges of HHRA and ERA.
The first part defines HHRA and ERA and describes the origins of risk assessment and management procedures at an international level. The precautionary principle has always been present in the European Union policies that aim to protect health and the environment.
In the second part, current approaches that characterise risk assessment, such as the tiered approach, are presented. In the future, the implementation of recent scientific developments for the construction of integrated exposure scenarios models is of paramount importance to improve environmental and health risk assessment schemes. Moreover, the evaluation of uncertainties in the modelling inputs and outputs and the sensitivity analysis are two key elements to optimise current HHRA and ERA procedures.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
EC, European Commission (2000) First report on the harmonization of risk assessment procedures. Dg Health and Consumer protection (SANCO)
Royal Society (1992) Risk analysis, perception and management. The Royal Society, London
IRGC, International Risk Governance Council (2005) Risk governance: towards an integrated approach. IRGC, Geneva. Available at: https://www.irgc.org/IMG/pdf/IRGC_WP_No_1_Risk_Governance__reprinted_version_.pdf. Accessed Dec 2016
OECD (2003) Emerging systemic risks. Final report to the OECD futures project. OECD, Paris
EPA, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2000) Risk Characterization (Handbook). Science Policy Council. EPA 100-B-00-002
Renn O (2005) Risk governance. Towards and integrative approach, international risk governance council, Geneva, Switzerland, White Paper No. 1
Stern PC, Fineberg HV (eds) (1996) Understanding risk: informing decisions in a democratic society. National Academies Press
Funtowicz S, Strand R (2007) Models of science and policy. Biosafety first: holistic approaches to risk and uncertainty in genetic engineering and genetically modified organisms, pp 263–278
Lupien JR (2000) The Codex Alimentarius Commission: international science-based standards, guidelines and recommendations. AgBioForum 3(4):192–196
NRC, National Research Council (1983) Risk assessment in the federal government: managing the process. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
Landis W, Sofield R, Yu MH, Landis WG (2003) Introduction to environmental toxicology: impacts of chemicals upon ecological systems. CRC Press
Suter II GW, Norton SB, Barnthouse LW (2003) The evolution of frameworks for ecological risk assessment from the Red Book ancestor. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/10807030390240391. Accessed 20 Dec 2016
Beanlands GE, Duinker PN (1983) An ecological framework for environmental impact assessment in Canada. Institute for Resource and Environmental Studies, Dalhousie University and Federal Environmental Assessment Review Office, Halifax, NS
CEQ, Council of Environental Quality (1986) Regulations for implementing the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act (40 CFR 1500-1508). July 1, 1986
Cairns J Jr, Dickson KL, Maki AW (1978) Estimating the hazard of chemical substances to aquatic life. Hydrobiologia 64:157. doi: 10.1007/BF00023191
USEPA, United States Environmental Protection Agency (1986) The risk assessment guidelines of 1986. EPA/600/8-87/045
Ehrlich A (1988) Risk Assessment Guidelines Update. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/D-88/264 (NTIS PB89133417)
Bascietto J, Hinckley D, Plafkin J, Slimak M (1990) Ecotoxicity and ecological risk assessment. Regulatory applications at EPA. Part 1. Environ Sci Technol 24(1):10–15
EPA, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1992) Framework for ecological risk assessment. Risk Assessment Forum, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC: EPA/630/R-92/001
EPA, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1998) Guidance for ecological risk assessment. Risk Assessment Forum, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC: EPA/630/R-95/002F
Vermeire T, Rikken M, Attias L, Boccardi P, Boeije G, Brooke D, de Bruijn J, Comber M, Dolan B, Fischer S, Heinemeyer G (2005) European Union system for the evaluation of substances: the second version. Chemosphere 59(4):473–485
Christoforou T (2001) The origin, content and role of the precautionary principle European Community Law. In: Freytag E, Jakl T, Loibl G, Wittmann M (eds) The role of precaution in chemicals policy: the precautionary principle in existing law, the Rationality of Precaution and the future of precaution in chemical policy. Diplomatic Academy, Vienna, pp. 23–41
Krämer L (2001) Precaution, the protection of health and the environment, and the free circulation of goods within the European Union. In: Freytag E, Jakl T, Loibl G, Wittmann M (eds) The role of precaution in chemicals policy: the precautionary principle in existing law, the Rationality of Precaution and the future of precaution in chemical policy. Diplomatic Academy, Vienna, pp. 42–54
Applegate JS (2000) The precautionary preference: an American perspective on the precautionary principle. Hum Ecol Risk Assess Int J 6(3):413–443
Harremoës P (2003) The need to account for uncertainty in public decision making related to technological change. Integrated Assess 4(1):18–25
Cross FB (1996) Paradoxical perils of the precautionary principle. Wash Lee Law Rev 53:851
Kriebel D, Tickner J, Epstein P, Lemons J, Levins R, Loechler EL, Quinn M, Rudel R, Schettler T, Stoto M (2001) The precautionary principle in environmental science. Environ Health Perspect 109(9):871
Saltelli A, Funtowicz S (2004) The precautionary principle: implications for risk management strategies. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 17(1):47–58
EC, European Commission (2000) Communication from the Commission on the precautionary principle. European Commission, Brussels: 2000 Feb. COM 1 final
Verstrynge J (2000) Precaution in the future European chemical policy. In: Freytag E, Jakl T, Loibl G, Wittmann M (eds) The role of precaution in chemicals policy: the precautionary principle in existing law, the Rationality of Precaution and the future of precaution in chemical policy. Diplomatic Academy, Vienna, pp. 160–164
Vos E (2000) EU food safety regulation in the aftermath of the BSE crisis. J Consum Policy 23(3):227–255
Stirling A (1999) On ‘Science’ and ‘Precaution’ in the management of technological risk, volume I: synthesis study, report to the EU Forward Studies Unit by European Science and Technology Observatory (ESTO), EUR19056 EN. IPTS, Sevilla
Stirling A (2001) On ‘Science’ and ‘Precaution’ in the management of technological risk, volume II: case studies, report to the EU Forward Studies Unit by European Science and Technology Observatory (ESTO). IPTS, Sevilla
Gee D, MacGarvin M, European Environment Agency (2001) In: Harremoës P (ed) Late lessons from early warnings: the precautionary principle 1896–2000. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities
Harremoës P, Gee D, MacGarvin M, Stirling A, Keys J, Wynne B, Vaz SG (2013) The precautionary principle in the 20th century: late lessons from early warnings. Routledge
UNECE, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (1998) Aarhus Convention. Available at: https://www.unece.org/env/pp/treatytext.html. Accessed Dec 2016
EC, European Commission (2001) European Commission Working Group 1.b. Democratising expertise and establishing European scientific references, in European Governance. A White Paper European Commission, Brussels: 2001 July. COM 428 final
Felt U, Wynne B, Callon M (2007) Taking European knowledge society seriously, vol 22. DG for Research. EUR, Luxembourg, p 700
Klintman M, Kronsell A (2010) Challenges to legitimacy in food safety governance? The case of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). J Eur Integr 32(3):309–327
EFSA, European Food Safety Authority (2016) EFSA strategy 2020. Trusted science for safe food. Available at: https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/corporate/pub/strategy2020. Accessed Jan 2017
ECB, European Chemicals Bureau (2003) Technical Guidance Document on risk assessment. Available at: https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/16960216/tgdpart2_2ed_en.pdf. Accessed Dec 2016
EFSA, European Food Safety Authority (2016) Guidance to develop specific protection goals options for environmental risk assessment at EFSA, in relation to biodiversity and ecosystem services. EFSA J 14(6):4499, 50 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4499
SCHER (Scientific Committee on Health and Environmental Risks), SCENIHR (Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks), SCCS (Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety) (2013) Making risk assessment more relevant for risk management
EPA, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1992) Guidelines for exposure assessment. Risk Assessment Forum, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC: EPA/600/Z-92/001
Baker JL, Barefoot AC, Beasley LE, Burns LA, Caulkins PP, Clark JE, Feulner RL, Giesy JP, Graney RL, Griggs RH, Jacoby HM, Laskowski DA, Maciorowski AF, Mihaich EM, Nelson Jr HP, Parrish PR, Siefert RE, Solomon KR, van der Schalie WH (eds) (1994) Aquatic dialogue group: pesticide risk assessment and mitigation. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Pensacola, USA
ECHA, European Chemicals Agency (2008) Guidance for information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Guidance for the implementation of REACH. Chapter R.19: Uncertainty analysis in the Chemical Safety Assessment. Helsinki, Finland, May 2008. www.echa.europa.eu. Accessed Dec 2016
Evans RM, Scholze M, Kortenkamp A (2015) Examining the feasibility of mixture risk assessment: a case study using a tiered approach with data of 67 pesticides from the Joint FAO/WHO Meeting on Pesticide Residues (JMPR). Food Chem Toxicol 84:260–269
Tarazona JV, Vega MM (2002) Hazard and risk assessment of chemicals for terrestrial ecosystems. Toxicology 181:187–191
Urban DJ, Cook NJ (1986) Standard evaluation procedure for ecological risk assessment. Hazard Evaluation Division, Office of Pesticide Programs, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC
EFSA, European Food Safety Authority (2010) EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR); Scientific Opinion on the development of specific protection goal options for environmental risk assessment of pesticides, in particular in relation to the revision of the Guidance Documents on Aquatic and Terrestrial Ecotoxicology (SANCO/3268/2001 and SANCO/10329/2002). EFSA J 8(10):1821
EFSA PPR Panel (EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues) (2013) Guidance on tiered risk assessment for plant protection products for aquatic organisms in edge-of-field surface waters. EFSA J 11(7):3290, 186 p
EFSA, European Food Safety Authority (2015) FSA PPR Panel (EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues), 2015. Scientific Opinion addressing the state of the science on risk assessment of plant protection products for non-target arthropods. EFSA J 13(2):3996, 212 pp
Forbes VE, Calow P, Sibly RM (2008) The extrapolation problem and how population modeling can help. Environ Toxicol Chem 27(10):1987–1994
Forbes VE, Calow P, Grimm V, Hayashi TI, Jager T, Katholm A, Palmqvist A, Pastorok R, Salvito D, Sibly R, Spromberg J (2011) Adding value to ecological risk assessment with population modeling. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 17(2):287–299
Hommen U, Baveco JM, Galic N, van den Brink PJ (2010) Potential application of ecological models in the European environmental risk assessment of chemicals I: review of protection goals in EU directives and regulations. Integr Environ Assess Manag 6(3):325–337
Nienstedt K, Brock T, van Wensem J, Montforts M, Hart A, Aagaard A, Alix A, Boesten J, Bopp S, Brown C, Capri E, Forbes V, Kopp H, Liess M, Luttik R, Maltby L, Sousa J, Streissl F, Hardy AR (2012) Development of a framework based on an ecosystem services approach for deriving specific protection goals for environmental risk assessment of pesticides. Sci Total Environ 415:31–38
Maltby L (2013) Ecosystem services and the protection, restoration, and management of ecosystems exposed to chemical stressors. Environ Toxicol Chem 32(5):974–983
MEA, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human wellbeing: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC, USA
Brock T (2013) Priorities to improve the ecological risk assessment and management for pesticides in surface water. Integr Environ Assess Manag 9(3):e64–e74
EPA, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2015) National Ecosystem Services Classification System (NESCS): Framework Design and Policy Application. Office of water/Office of Research and Development. EPA-800-R-15-002
EC, European Commission (2013) Overview of CAP Reform 2014–2020. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/cap-post-2013_en. Accessed Dec 2016
Grêt-Regamey A, Weibel B, Kienast F, Rabe SE, Zulian G (2015) A tiered approach for mapping ecosystem services. Ecosyst Serv 13:16–27
EC, European Commission (2010) Europe 2020: a European strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Available at: http://www.efesme.org/europe-2020-a-strategy-for-smart-sustainable-and-inclusive-growth. Accessed Dec 2016
Stirling A (1998) Risk at a turning point? J Risk Res 1(2):97–109
Walker WE, Harremoes P, Rotmans J, Van der Sluijs JP, MBA VA, Janssen P, Krayer von Krauss MP (2003) Defining uncertainty a conceptual basis for uncertainty management in model-based decision support. Integrated Assess 4(1):5e17
Raybould A (2010) Reducing uncertainty in regulatory decision-making for transgenic crops: more ecological research or clearer environmental risk assessment? GM Crops 1(1):25–31
Funtowicz S, Ravetz JR (1990) Uncertainty and quality in science for policy. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Funtowicz S, Ravetz JR (2003) Post-normal science. International Society for Ecological Economics (ed), Online Encyclopedia of Ecological Economics at: http://isecoeco.org/pdf/pstnormsc.pdf. Accessed Dec 2016
Grandjean P (2004) Underestimation of risk due to exposure misclassification. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 17:131–136
Hart A, Gosling JP, Boobis A, Coggon D, Craig P, Jones D (2010) Development of a framework for evaluation and expression of uncertainties in hazard and risk assessment. Final Report of Food Standards Agency Project Number T01056
Van Der Sluijs JP, Craye M, Funtowicz S, Kloprogge P, Ravetz J, Risbey J (2005) Combining quantitative and qualitative measures of uncertainty in model-based environmental assessment: the NUSAP system. Risk Anal 25(2):481–492
Chatfielf C (2006) Model uncertainty. Encyclopedia of Environmetrics
Saltelli A, Guimarães Pereira A, Van der Sluijs JP, Funtowicz S (2013) What do I make of your Latinorum? Sensitivity auditing of mathematical modelling. Int J Foresight Innov Policy 9(2/3/4):213–234
Mowrer HT (2000) Uncertainty in natural resource decision support systems: sources, interpretation and importance. Comput Electron Agr 27:139–154
Frewer LJ, Fischer ARH, van den Brink PJ, Byrne P, Brock T, Brown C, Crocker J, Goerlitz G, Hart A, Scholderer J, Solomon K (2008) Potential for the adoption of probabilistic risk assessments by end-users and decision-makers. Hum Ecol Risk Assess Int J 14(1):166–178
EUPRA, EU Pesticide Risk Assessment workshop (2001) Probabilistic risk assessment for pesticides in Europe. Implementation and research needs. Report from the European Workshop on Probabilistic Risk Assessment for the Environmental Impacts of Plant Protection Products, The Netherlands, 109
Saltelli A, Tarantola S, Campolongo F, Ratto M (2004) Sensitivity analysis in practice: a guide to assessing scientific models. Wiley
Ciffroy P, Alfonso B, Altenpohl A, Banjac Z, Bierkens J, Brochot C, Critto A, De Wilde T, Fait G, Fierens T, Garratt J, Giubilato E, Grange E, Johansson E, Radomyski A, Reschwann K, Suciu N, Van Holderbeke M, Verdonck F, Vlajic A (2016) Modelling the exposure to chemicals for risk assessment: a comprehensive library of multimedia and PBPK models for integration, prediction, uncertainty and sensitivity analysis – the MERLIN-Expo tool. Sci Total Environ 568:770–784
Dubus IG, Brown CD, Beulke S, Turner NL (2002) Uncertainty and probabilistic approaches to pesticide fate modelling. Cranfield Centre for Ecochemistry research report for DEFRA PL0548, Cranfield University, Silsoe, UK
Péry ARR, Schüürmann G, Ciffroy P, Faust M, Backhaus T, Aicher L, et al (2016) Perspectives for integrating human and environmental risk assessment and synergies with socio-economic analysis. Sci Total Environ 456:307–316
WHO, World Health Organization (2001) Integrated Risk Assessment. Report prepared for the WHO/UNEP/ILO International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS). International Programme on Chemical Safety, Geneva, Switzerland (WHO/IPCS/IRA/01/12). Available at: http://www.who.int/ipcs/publications/new_issues/ira/en/. Accessed Dec 2016
Ciffroy P, Péry ARR, Roth N (2015) Perspectives for integrating human and environmental exposure assessments. Sci Total Environ 568:512–521
EFSA, European Food Safety Authority (2015) Harmonisation of human and ecological risk assessment of combined exposure to multiple chemicals
Suter GW, Vermeire T, Munns WR, Sekizawa J (2005) An integrated framework for health and ecological risk assessment. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 207(2):611–616
Jongeneelen F, ten Berge W, Boogaard PJ (2013) Computational toxicology: Chapter 8. Interpretation of human biological monitoring data using a newly developed generic physiological-based toxicokinetic model: examples of simulations with carbofuran and methyl ethyl ketone. Elsevier Inc. Chapters
Lilienblum W, Dekant W, Foth H, Gebel T, Hengstler JG, Kahl R, Kramer PJ, Schweinfurth H, Wollin KM (2008) Alternative methods to safety studies in experimental animals: role in the risk assessment of chemicals under the new European Chemicals Legislation (REACH). Arch Toxicol 82(4):211–236
Beyer J, Petersen K, Song Y, Ruus A, Grung M, Bakke T, Tollefsen KE (2014) Environmental risk assessment of combined effects in aquatic ecotoxicology: a discussion paper. Mar Environ Res 96:81–91
Kienzler A, Berggren A, Bessem J, Bopp S, Van der Linden S, Worth A (2014) Assessment of mixtures – review of regulatory requirements and guidance (EUR26675 EN)
Wilks MF, Roth N, Aicher L, Faust M, Papadaki P, Marchis A, Calliera M, Ginebreda A, Andres S, Kühne R, Schüürmann G, HEROIC consortium (2015) White paper on the promotion of an integrated risk assessment concept in European regulatory frameworks for chemicals. Sci Total Environ 521–522:211–218
Calliera M, Marchis A, Sacchettini G, Capri E (2016) Stakeholder consultations and opportunities for integrating socio-behavioural factors into the pesticide risk analysis process. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 23:2937–2947
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Suciu, N.A. et al. (2018). Evolution and Future of Human Health and Environmental Risk Assessment. In: Ciffroy, P., Tediosi, A., Capri, E. (eds) Modelling the Fate of Chemicals in the Environment and the Human Body. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, vol 57. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59502-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59502-3_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59500-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59502-3
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)