Skip to main content

Between Truth and Democracy: Mostafa Malekian’s Spiritual Intellectualism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Post-Islamist Political Theory

Part of the book series: Philosophy and Politics - Critical Explorations ((PPCE,volume 5))

  • 1220 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter deals with Mostafa Malekian’s social and political thought. After an overview of Malekian’s spirituality thesis and his view on the relationship between reason and religion, I discuss his outlook on the social ethos of spiritual citizens in which he lists the virtues that, following from his rationality and spirituality thesis, citizens of a well-ordered democracy would follow. The third part of this chapter focuses on Malekina’s theory of toleration and his particular defense of political secularism. Malekian argues that one of our fundamental moral duties is to seek the truth while another is to follow justice. The latter obliges us to behave tolerantly towards others when the first duty does not apply, i.e. in those cases were a clear and definite (objective in-practice) truth is unavailable. The last part of this chapter includes an evaluation of Malekian’s thesis on the relationship between truth and democracy from the perspective of political liberalism. Drawing on Rawls’s political philosophy, I argue that Malekian’s theory of toleration suffers from a confusion between the demands of acting morally in the public and private spheres.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Malekian, “Ruh-e Naaram-e Yek Roshanfekr”, pp. 26–27. For Malekian’s intellectual biography, see Malekian, “Ruh-e Naaram-e Yek Roshanfekr”; Malekian, “Salhaye Daneshjui Man”; Sadeghi-Boroujerdi, “Mostafa Malekian: Spirituality, Siyasat-Zadegi and (A)political Self-Improvement”, specially pp. 282–286; Malekian, “Ruykardhaye Motafavet dar Tarikh-e Falsafe-Negari”, pp. 7–9.

  2. 2.

    Malekian, “Manaviyat Gohar-e Adyan (1)”, pp. 274–275.

  3. 3.

    Malekian, “Manaviyat Gohar-e Adyan (1)”, p. 300.

  4. 4.

    Malekian, “Manaviyat Gohar-e Adyan (1)”, p. 280.

  5. 5.

    Malekian, “Manaviyat Gohar-e Adyan (1)”, pp. 275–285.

  6. 6.

    See Kant, “An Answer to the Question ‘What is Enlightenment?’”.

  7. 7.

    See Locke, “Of Faith and Reason, and Their Distinct Provinces”; Malekian (translator), “Dar Bab-e Aql va Iman va Sahathaye Motamayeze Anha”.

  8. 8.

    See Malekain, “Aqlaniyat va Manaviyat Pas az Dah Sal” [Rationality and Spirituality after 10 Years], pp. 8–9. (The page numbers refer to the pdf version of this lecture.); Malekian, “Ruh-e Naaram-e Yek Roshanfekr”, p. 24.

  9. 9.

    Malekian, “Aqlaniyat va Manaviyat Pas az Dah Sal”, pp. 2–6.

  10. 10.

    See Malekian. “Az Roshanfekri-ye Manavi Defa Mikonam”.

  11. 11.

    See Malekian, “Manaviyat Gohar-e Adyan (1)”, p. 299.

  12. 12.

    On early Malekian, see Malekian, “Manaviyat Gohar-e Adyan (1)”, Malekian. “Manaviyat Gohar-e Adyan (2)”, Malekian. “Porseshhai Piramune Manaviyat”. Malekian’s later rhetoric on spirituality and religiosity can be found in various lectures and interviews, including Malekain, “Aqlaniyat va Manaviyat Pas az Dah Sal”; Malekian, “Sazgari-ye Manaviyat va Modernite”; Malekian, “Az Roshanfekri-ye Manavi Defa Mikonam”.

  13. 13.

    cf. Malekian, “Taqrir-e Haqiqat va Taqlil-e Mararat”, especially pp. 3–12, 28–29.

  14. 14.

    See Malekian, “Aglaniyat va Manaviyat pas az Dah sal”, p. 1. On the place of Malekian in religious intellectual history, see also Mansour Hashemi, “Andishmand-e Doreye Esteqrar: Malekian dar Tarikh-e Roshanfekriye Iran”, where it is argued that Malekian’s rationality and spirituality thesis is both “a continuation of”, and “a turning point in”, the religious intellectual movement; cf. Naraghi, “Ayande-ye Marjaiyat-e Fekr-e Dini”.

  15. 15.

    Mojtahed Shabestari, “Naqd-e Tafakor-e Kalamiye Sonati dar Eslam-e Moaser”, pp. 189–190.

  16. 16.

    al-Rad Surah, Verse 11; in Arabic: Innallaha la yuqayyiru ma bi qavmin hatta yuqayyiru ma bi anfusihim. On the priority of culture thesis, see Malekian, “Mabaniye Farhangiye Demokrasi”, p. 6; Malekian, “Mabani-ye Nazari-ye Eslahtalabi”, p. 43; Malekian, “Taqrir-e Haqiqat va Taqlil-e Mararat”, p. 14; Malekian, “Dar Defa az Esalat-e Farhang va Naqde Siyasatzadegi”.

  17. 17.

    See Malekian, “Roshanfekriye Dini va Eslahat-e Ejtemai”, pp. 293–294; Malekian, “Roshanfekri: Namayandegiye Farhangi ya Davariye Farhangi?”; cf. Malekain, “Aqlaniyat va Manaviyat Pas az Dah Sal”, p. 10.

  18. 18.

    See Ganji, The Road to Democracy in Iran, p. 27.

  19. 19.

    See Cooper, “Socrates (469-399 BC)”, in Routledge Encyclopaedia of Philosophy; Malekian, “Roshanfekri: Namayandegiye Farhangi ya Davariye Farhangi?”, pp. 455–456.

  20. 20.

    See Soroush, “Types of Religiosity”.

  21. 21.

    On Rawls’s distinction between political and moral autonomies, see Rawls, Political Liberalism, pp. 72–81; cf. Habermas’s distinction between public and private autonomies, and their respective definitions, in Habermas, Between Facts and Norms, pp. 122–123. For a critique of Malekian’s view of religiosity from a Soroushian perspective, see Dabbagh, “Taabod va Modern Budan”; cf. Naraghi’s essay on the logic of religious reform, which defends a minimalist approach to rationality, in contrast to Malekian’s more demanding maximalist view of reason: Naraghi, “Sonnatgerayi dar Qalamro-e Din”.

  22. 22.

    See Malekian, “Taqrir-e Haqiqat va Taqlil-e Mararat”, pp. 9–33; cf. Ross, The Right and the Good; Ross, Foundations of Ethics & Philip Stratton-Lake’s “Introduction” to The Right and the Good—especially where he discusses Ross’s views on ‘Prima Facie Duties’, ‘Pluralism about the Good’, and ‘Self-Evidence’, pp. xxxiii–xlix.

    For a good elaboration on Ross’s theory of prima facie moral duties in Persian, see Dabbagh, “Akhlaq-e Vazayef-e dar Nazar-e Avval: Nemunei az Aamgerai-ye Akhlaqi-ye Motadel”; cf. Dabbagh, “Mabaniye Akhlaqiye Demokrasi” and Dabbagh, “Andar Bab-e Siyasat va Akhlaq”, where Dabbagh uses Ross’s theory of prima facie duties to argue for our moral duty to be liberal democrats.

  23. 23.

    See Malekian, “Taqrir-e Haqiqat, Taqlil-e Mararat”, pp. 28–32.

  24. 24.

    See Malekian, “Taqrir-e Haqiqat va Taqlil-e Mararat”, pp. 19–27.

  25. 25.

    See Malekian, “Mabaniye Farhangiye Demokrasi”. All page numbers in this chapter refer to the script prepared and edited by Ebrahim Haidari. A less accurate edition of this script, in addition to a critique, is available at Hamidiye, “Naqd-e Didgahhaye Mostafa Malekian: Mabaniye Farhangiye Demokrasi”.

  26. 26.

    On the ethics of belief, see Malekian, “Tafakor-e Naqadane dar Akhlaq-e Bavar Rishe Darad”.

  27. 27.

    Malekian, “Mabaniye Farhangiye Demokrasi”, pp. 8–10; cf. Malekian, “Aqideparasti”.

  28. 28.

    See Rawls, Political Liberalism, pp. 54–58.

  29. 29.

    See Plato, Republic, Book III, 412e–414d.

  30. 30.

    See also Malekian, “Sekularism va Hokumat-e Dini”, pp. 262–265.

  31. 31.

    Malekian, “Mabaniye Farhangiye Demokrasi”, pp. 11–21; On the spiritual virtue of working, see also Malekian, “Mabani-ye Nazari-ye Eslahtalabi”, pp. 58–59.

  32. 32.

    See Malekian, “Na Sosyalist-e Ideolojik, Na Liberalist-e Ideolojik”, pp. 64–65.

  33. 33.

    See Malekian, “Seyri dar Sepehr-e Akhlaq”.

  34. 34.

    See Ross, The Right and the Good, p. 15.

  35. 35.

    Ibid, pp. 29–30.

  36. 36.

    See Philip Stratton-Lake, “Introduction”, The Right and the Good.

  37. 37.

    See Malekian, “Melliyat; Tavahom ya Vaqeiyat”.

  38. 38.

    See Malekian, “Melliyat; Tavahom ya Vaqeiyat”; cf. Malekian, “Ba Nasionalism-e Mobtani bar Arzesh va Davari Mokhalefam”.

  39. 39.

    Malekian, “Ba Nasionalism-e Mobtani bar Arzesh va Davari Mokhalefam”.

  40. 40.

    See Kant, “Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch”.

  41. 41.

    See Malekian, “Melliyat; Tavahom ya Vaqeiyat”.

  42. 42.

    This theory is presented in these essays: Malekian, “Mabani-ye Nazari-ye”; Malekian, “Sekularism va Hokumat-e Dini”; Malekian, “Mabani-ye Nazari-ye Eslahtalabi”, specially pp. 34–42.

  43. 43.

    See Malekian, “Mabani-ye Nazari-ye Modara”, pp. 117–118; Malekian, “Sekularism va Hokumat-e Dini”, pp. 255–256. Some of the examples are mine, inspired by Malekian’s examples and explanations in these pages.

  44. 44.

    Malekian, “Mabani-ye Nazari-ye Modara”, p. 118.

  45. 45.

    See Malekian, “Goftegu dar bareye Hakemiyat-e Dini”, p. 360.

  46. 46.

    Malekian, “Mabani-ye Nazari-ye Modara”, pp. 121–122; Malekian, “Sekularism va Hokumat-e Dini”, p. 251.

  47. 47.

    Malekian, “Mabani-ye Nazari-ye Modara”, p. 124.

  48. 48.

    See Malekian, “Mabani-ye Nazari-ye Modara”, p. 120. For a discussion about the difference between subjects and objects of toleration, see Kabasakal Badamchi, “Is Toleration Possible and Morally Relevant in the International Realm?”, the section on “Agents and Objects of International Toleration”, pp. 9–10.

  49. 49.

    Malekian, “Mabani-ye Nazari-ye Eslahtalabi”, pp. 59–60; cf. Malekian, “Sekularism va Hokumat-e Dini”, p. 252.

  50. 50.

    Malekian, “Mabani-ye Nazari-ye Modara”, p. 119.

  51. 51.

    Ibid, p. 125.

  52. 52.

    See Kierkegaard, “Truth in Subjectivity”, p. 403; Malekian (translator), “Anfosi Budan Haqiqat Ast”, p. 30; cf. Malekian (translator), “Adelle-ye Kierkegaard bar Zedde Estedlal-e Afaqi dar Din”; Minton, “Kierkegaard and Truth as Subjectivity”.

  53. 53.

    Malekian, “Akhlaq-e Eslahat”, pp. 94–97.

  54. 54.

    See Malekian, “Sekularism va Hokumat-e Dini”, pp. 257–258; Malekian, “Mabani-ye Nazari-ye Eslahtalabi”, pp. 34–42. The example is modified to become more comprehensible. Malekian’s original example concerns a state governed by “Imam Ali’s justice”, instead of the guardianship of the jurist.

  55. 55.

    On the relationship between dividing the propositions into in principle objective, in practice objective and subjective beliefs, the rationality and spirituality thesis, and the Enlightenment philosophers’ idea of scientific rationality, see Malekian. Iman va Taaqol: Darsgoftarhaye Falsafe Din: 1380–1382, pp. 223–237.

  56. 56.

    See for example Rawls’s ‘Introduction’ to the paperback edition, and Lecture VI of Political Liberalism.

  57. 57.

    See Ferrara, The Democratic Horizon, pp. 26–27. For another useful discussion on the ideas of public and private from a liberal perspective, see Kymlicka, Contemporary Political Philosophy, pp. 386–398.

  58. 58.

    See Ferrara, The Democratic Horizon, p. 28.

  59. 59.

    Rawls, “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited”, p. 767.

  60. 60.

    Ferrara, The Democratic Horizon, p. 190, emphasis original; cf. Ferrara, The Democratic Horizon, pp. 186–209.

  61. 61.

    On the relationship between truth and public reason, and the necessity of allowing a limited idea of truth to have a role in political liberalism, see also Cohen, “Truth and Public Reason”.

  62. 62.

    See for example Plato, Gorgias, 463d1–465e1; Plato, Republic, Book VI.

  63. 63.

    See Estlund, “Making Truth Safe for Democracy”, especially p. 72, 84; Copp, “Could Political Truth be a Hazard for Democracy”, especially pp. 107–108; cf. Estlund, Democratic Authority.

  64. 64.

    See Grofman & Feld, “Rousseau’s General Will: A Condorcetian Perspective”, (quoted in Estlund, “Making Truth Safe”, p. 92); Estlund, Waldron, Grofman & Feld, “Democratic Theory and the Public Interest: Condorcet and Rousseau Revisited”; cf. Estlund, Democratic Authority.

  65. 65.

    See Ferrara, The Democratic Horizon, p. 191.

  66. 66.

    See Ferrara, The Democratic Horizon, p. 190.

  67. 67.

    Ibid.

  68. 68.

    See Ferrara, The Democratic Horizon, p. 190. Emphasis original.

  69. 69.

    A similar objection to Malekian’s theory of secularism and toleration was presented by Hossein Kachuyan, an Islamist professor of sociology in Tehran University, in a debate. See Kachuyan & Malekian, “Sekularsim, Bavarhaye Dini, va Hokumat”.

  70. 70.

    See Malekian, “Olaviyat-e Falsafe bar Demokrasi”, especially pp. 187–191; Rorty, “The Priority of Democracy to Philosophy”. Rorty’s article is also translated into Persian as, Deyhimi, (trans.), Rorty, Olaviyat-e Demokrasi bar Falsafe, Tehran: Tarh-e No.

  71. 71.

    See Kymlicka, Contemporary Political Philosophy, p. 290.

  72. 72.

    See Kymlicka, Contemporary Political Philosophy, p. 291; cf. Kymlicka, Badamchi & Mobasheri (trans.), Daramadi bar Falsafeye Siyasiye Moaser, Chapter 7.

  73. 73.

    See Malekian, “Ruh-e Naaram-e Yek Roshanfekr”, pp. 25–26.

  74. 74.

    See Sadeghi-Boroujerdi, “Mostafa Malekian: Spirituality, Siyasat-Zadegi and (A)political Self-Improvement”, pp. 306–307. For another critique of Malekian’s apoliticism and his reduction of politics to moralism, see Ayatollahi, “Dar Naqd-e Ravesh va Manesh-e Roshanfekriye Mostafa Malekian”; especially section II entitled: ‘Az Siyasatgorizi dar Esalat-e Farhang ta Akhlaqgerai dar Siyasat-e Ruz’ [From Apoliticism in the Priority of Culture to Moralism in Daily Politics].

Bibliography

  • Ayatollahi, Amir Yahya. 23rd December 2015. Dar Naqd-e Ravesh va Manesh-e Roshanfekriye Mostafa Malekian [A Critique of Mostafa Malekian’s Manner and Method of Intellectualism]. Radiozamaneh. Available at: http://www.radiozamaneh.com/252488. Accessed Feb 2016.

  • Badamchi, Meysam, and Mohammad Mobasheri. (Trans.) 1396 [2017]. Will Kymlicka. Daramadi bar Falsafeye Siyasiye Moaser [Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction]. Tehran: Negah-e Moaser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Joshua. 2009. Truth and Public Reason. Philosophy & Public Affairs 37 (1): 2–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copp, David. 1993. Could Political Truth be a Hazard for Democracy. In The Idea of Democracy, ed. David Copp, Jean Hampton, and John Roemer, 101–117. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, John M. 1998. Socrates (469–399 BC). In Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 10 vols. Edward Graic (General Editor). London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabbagh, Soroush. 1387 [2008a]. Mabaniye Akhlaqiye Demokrasi [The Moral Foundations of Democracy]. In Amre Akhlaqi, Amre Motaali: Jostarhaye Falsafi [Ethical Issues, Transcendental Issues: Philosophical Essays], 67–82. Tehran: Ketab-e Parse.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1387 [2008b]. “Andar Bab-e Siyasat va Akhlaq” [On Politics and Ethics]. In Amre Akhlaqi, Amre Motaali: Jostarhaye Falsafi [Ethical Issues, Transcendental Issues: Philosophical Essays], 83–96. Tehran: Ketab-e Parse.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1387 [2008c]. Taabod va Modern Budan: Naqdi bar Ara-ye Mostafa Malekian dar Bab-e Nesbat-e Din va Modernite [Obedience and Being Modern: A Critique of Mostafa Malekian’s Views on the Relationship between Religion and Modernity]. In Amre Akhlaqi, Amre Motaali: Jostarhaye Falsafi [Ethical Issues, Transcendental Issues: Philosophical Essays], 117–133. Tehran: Ketab-e Parse.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1388 [2009]. Akhlaq-e Vazayef-e dar Nazar-e Avval: Nemunei az Aamgerai-ye Akhlaqi-ye Motadel [The Ethics of Prima Facie Duties: An Example of Moderate Moral Particularism]. In Aam va Khas dar Akhlaq, 107–155. Tehran: Hermes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deyhimi, Khashayar (Trans.). 1388 [2009]. Richard Rorty. Olaviyat-e Demokrasi bar Falsafe [The Priority of Democracy to Philosophy]. Tehran: Tarh-e No.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estlund, David. 1993. Making Truth Safe for Democracy. In The Idea of Democracy, ed. David Copp, Jean Hampton, and John Roemer, 71–100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estlund, David M. 2008. Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estlund, David, Jeremy Waldron, Bernard Grofman, and Scott L. Feld. 1989. Democratic Theory and the Public Interest: Condorcet and Rousseau Revisited. The American Political Science Review 83 (4): 1317–1340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrara, Alessandro. 2014. The Democratic Horizon: Hyperpluralism and the Renewal of Political Liberalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ganji, Akbar. 2008. The Road to Democracy in Iran. Foreword by Joshua Cohen and Abbas Milani, Boston Review Books. Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grofman, Bernard, and Scott L. Feld. 1988. Rousseau’s General Will: A Condorcetian Perspective. The American Political Science Review 82 (2): 567–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jurgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Trans. W. Rehg. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamidiye, Behzad. Spring 1385 [2006]. “Naqd-e Didgahhaye Mostafa Malekian: Mabaniye Farhangiye Demokrasi” [A Critique of Mostafa Malekian’s Views: The Cultural Foundations of Democracy]. Rahbord-e Tosee. No. 5, 231–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashemi, Mohammad Mansour. Khordad 1989 [June 2010]. Andishmand-e Doreye Esteqrar: Malekian dar Tarikh-e Roshanfekriye Iran [The Thinker of Stability Era: Malekian in the History of Iran’s Intellectualism]. In Mehrnameh, Vol. 1. No. 3. Available at: http://www.mehrnameh.ir/. Accessed Jan 2016.

  • Kabasakal Badamchi, Devrim. Fall 2011. Is Toleration Possible and Morally Relevant in the International Realm?. Turkey: Uluslararası İlişkiler 8(31): 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kachuyan, Hossein, and Mostafa Malekian. 11 Khordad 1385 [June 2006]. Sekularsim, Bavarhaye Dini, va Hokumat (debate). Available at: http://neeloofar.org/mostafamalekian/lecture/140-2012-11-01-15-12-27.html. Accessed Jan 2016.

  • Kant, Immanuel. 1991a. An Answer to the Question ‘What is Enlightenment?’. In Kant: Political Writings, ed. H.S. Reiss, 54–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1991b. Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch. In Kant: Political Writings, ed. H.S. Reiss, 93–130. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kierkegaard, Soren. 1987. Truth is Subjectivity. In Philosophy of Religion: An Anthology, ed. Louis P. Pojman, 399–408. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, Will. 2002. Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction. 2nd ed. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, John. 1999. Of Faith and Reason, and Their Distinct Provinces. In An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, 685–693. Book IV, Chapter XVIII. The Pennsylvania State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malekian, Mostafa. 1381 [2002a]. Taqrir-e Haqiqat va Taqlil-e Mararat: Vajh-e Akhlaqi va Terajike Zendegiye Roshanfekri [The Expression of truth and the Diminution of Suffering: the Moral and Tragic Side of Intellectual Life]. In Rahi be Rahai: Jostarhai dar Aqlaniyat va Manaviyat [A Path to Emancipation: Essays on Rationality and Spirituality], 9–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1381 [2002b]. Mabani-ye Nazari-ye Modara [The Theoretical Foundations of Toleration]. In Rahi be Rahai: Jostarhai dar Aqlaniyat va Manaviyat [A Path to Emancipation: Essays on Rationality and Spirituality], 113–126. Tehran: Negah-e Moaser.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (Trans.) 1381 [2002c]. John Locke. Dar Bab-e Aql va Iman va Sahathaye Motamayeze Anha (translation of John Locke’s “Of Faith and Reason, and Their Distinct Provinces”). In Seyri dar Sepehre Jan: Maqalato Maqulati dar Manaviyat [A Journey into the Sphere of the Soul: Discourses and Essays on Spirituality], 5–17. Tehran: Negah-e Moaser.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (Trans.) 1381 [2002d]. Anfosi Budan Haqiqat Ast (translation of Soren Kierkegaard’s “Truth is Subjectivity”). In Seyri dar Sepehre Jan: Maqalato Maqulati dar Manaviyat [A Journey into the Sphere of Soul: Discourses and Essays on Spirituality], 19–48. Tehran: Negah-e Moaser.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (Trans.) 1381 [2002e]. Adelle-ye Kierkegaard bar Zedde Estedlal-e Afaqi dar Din (translation of Robert Merrihew Adams’s “Kierkegaard’s Argument against Objective Reasoning in Religion”). In Seyri dar Sepehre Jan: Maqalato Maqulati dar Manaviyat [A Journey in the Sphere of the Soul: Discourses and Essays on Spirituality], 49–78. Tehran: Negah-e Moaser.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1381 [2002f]. Sekularism va Hokumat-e Dini [Secularism and the Religious State]. In Sonnat va Sekularism: Goftarhai Az: Abdolkarim Soroush, Mostafa Malekian, Mohammad Mojtahed Shabestari, and Mohsen Kadivar [Tradition and Secularism: Essays by Abdolkarim Soroush, Mostafa Malekian, Mohammad Mojtahed Shabestari, and Mohsen Kadivar], 245–265. Tehran: Serat.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1381[2002g]. Manaviyat Gohar-e Adyan (1) [Spirituality: the Essence of Religions (1)]. In Sonnat va Sekularism: Goftarhai Az: Abdolkarim Soroush, Mostafa Malekian, Mohammad Mojtahed Shabestari, and Mohsen Kadivar [Tradition and Secularism: Essays by Abdolkarim Soroush, Mostafa Malekian, Mohammad Mojtahed Shabestari, and Mohsen Kadivar], 267–306. Tehran: Serat Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1381 [2002h]. Manaviyat Gohar-e Adyan (2) [Spirituality: the Essence of Religions (2)]. In Sonnat va Sekularism: Goftarhai Az: Abdolkarim Soroush, Mostafa Malekian, Mohammad Mojtahed Shabestari, and Mohsen Kadivar [Tradition and Secularism: Essays by Abdolkarim Soroush, Mostafa Malekian, Mohammad Mojtahed Shabestari, and Mohsen Kadivar], 307–343. Tehran: Serat Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1381 [2002i]. Porseshhai Piramune Manaviyat [Questions on Spirituality]. In Sonnat va Sekularism: Goftarhai Az: Abdolkarim Soroush, Mostafa Malekian, Mohammad Mojtahed Shabestari, and Mohsen Kadivar [Tradition and Secularism: Essays by Abdolkarim Soroush, Mostafa Malekian, Mohammad Mojtahed Shabestari, and Mohsen Kadivar], 344–404. Tehran: Serat Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Khordad-Mordad 1383 [June–August 2004]. Olaviyat-e Falsafe bar Demokrasi: Naqdi bar Maqaleye Olaviyat-e Demokrasi bar Falsafe Nevshte-ye Richard Rorty” [The Priority of Philosophy to Democracy: A Critique of Rorty’s article on the Priority of Democracy to Philosophy]. Naqed 3: 167–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malekain, Mostafa. Khordad 1384 [June 2005]. Ebrahim Haidari (ed.), Mabaniye Farhangiye Demokrasi [The Cultural Foundations of Democracy], the lecture given in the Transition to Democracy Seminar held at the Faculty of Social Sciences in Tehran University, The audio file and script. Available at: http://bidgoli1371.blogfa.com/. Accessed June 2015.

  • Malekian, Mostafa. 1385 [2006a]. Ruykardhaye Motafavet dar Tarikh-e Falsafe-Negari [Different Approaches to Writing the History of Philosophy]. In Moshtaqi va Mahjuri:Gofteguhai dar bab-e Farhang va Siyasat [Separation and Longing: Dialogues in Culture and Politics], 7–64. Tehran: Negah-e Moaser.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1385 [2006b]. Roshanfekriye Dini va Eslahat-e Ejtemai [Religions Intellectualism and Social Reforms]. In Moshtaqi va Mahjuri:Gofteguhai dar bab-e Farhang va Siyasat [Separation and Longing: Dialogues in Culture and Politics], 281–300. Tehran: Negah-e Moaser.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1385 [2006c]. Goftegu dar bareye Hakemiyat-e Dini [A Dialogue on Religious Government]. In Moshtaqi va Mahjuri: Goftegu dar bab-e Farhang va Siyasat [Separation and Longing: Dialogues in Culture and Politics], 341–362. Tehran: Negah-e Moaser.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1385 [2006d]. Roshanfekri: Namayandegiye Farhangi ya Davariye Farhangi? [Intellectualism: Representation of Culture or Evaluation of Culture?]. In Mehr-e Mandegar: Maqalati dar Akhlaqshenasi [The Lasting Passion: Essays on Ethical Studies], 451–458. Tehran: Negah-e Moaser.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1385 [2006e]. Aqideparasti [Worshiping a Belief]. In Mehr-e Mandegar: Maqalati dar Akhlaqshenasi [The Lasting Passion: Essays on Ethical Studies], 459–464. Tehran: Negah-e Moaser.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Mordad 1385 [August 2006f]. Sazgari-ye Manaviyat va Modernite [The Compatibility of Spirituality and Modernity], interview with Sadra Sadeh and Fatemeh Shams, Sharq Newspaper. Available at: http://www.neeloofar.org/thinker/mostafamalekian/interview/227-2012-11-02-07-58-40.html. Accessed Jan 2016.

  • ———. 1387 [2008]. Iman va Taaqol: Darsgoftarhaye Falsafe Din: 1380–1382 [Faith and Rationality: Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion: 2001–2003], ed. Seyyed Alireza Salehi and Seyyed Mohammad Hosein Salehi. Qom: Entesharate Daneshgahe Adyan va Mazaheb.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1389 [2010a]. Mabani-ye Nazari-ye Eslahtalabi [The Theoretical Foundations of Reformism]. In Taqdire Ma Tadbire Ma [Our Destiny, Our Prudence], 27–77. Tehran: Negah-e Moaser.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1389 [2010b]. Akhlaq-e Eslahat [The Ethics of Reformation]. In Taqdire Ma Tadbire Ma [Our Destiny, Our Prudence], 85–105. Tehran: Negah-e Moaser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malekain, Mostafa. Ordibehesht 1389 [May 2010]. Aqlaniyat va Manaviyat Pas az Dah Sal [Rationality and Spirituality after Ten Years], lecture delivered in Tehran University’s Faculty of Law and Political Science. Available at: http://neeloofar.org/thinker/mostafamalekian/lecture/288-2012-11-02-10-08-44.html. Accessed Jan 2016.

  • Malekian, Mostafa. Ordibehesht-Khordad 1391 [May–June 2012]. Ruh-e Naaram-e Yek Roshanfekr, Sharh-e Yek Zendegi-ye Fekri: Goftogu ba Mostafa Malekian [The Unquiet Soul of an Intellectual, an Intellectual Biography: Dialogue with Mostafa Malekian]. Samina Rastegari (interviewer). Andisheh-ye Puya, 22–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 23rd Esfand 1391 [March 2013a]. Seyri dar Sepehr-e Akhlaq: Goftegu ba Mostafa Malekian [A Journey into the Sphere of Morality: Dialogue with Mostafa Malekian], interview with Etemad Newspaper. Available at: http://neeloofar.org/. Accessed Jan 2016.

  • ———. 8th Aban 1392 [November 2013b]. Tafakor-e Naqadane dar Akhlaq-e Bavar Rishe Darad [Critical Thinking is Rooted in the Ethics of Belief]. Etemad Newspaper’s report of Malekian’s lecture in Tehran’s Shahr-e Ketab’s weekly meetings. Available at: http://neeloofar.org/mostafamalekian/lecture/585-critical-thinking4.html. Accessed Jan 2016.

  • ———. 29th Bahman 1392 [March 2014]. Az Roshanfekri-ye Manavi Defa Mikonam [I defend Spiritual Intellectualism], interview with Farhang Emrooz Website. Reprinted in http://neeloofar.ir/mostafamalekian/dialogue/667-nazarate-malekian-darbare-roshanfekri.html. Accessed Jan 2016.

  • ———. 24th Frvardin 1394 [13th April 2015a]. Salhaye Daneshjui Man [My University Years]. Fatemeh Faramarzi (interviewer). Available at: http://www.cgie.org.ir/fa/news/28657. Accessed Feb 2016.

  • ———. Novruz 1394 [March 2015b]. Na Sosyalist-e Ideolojik, Na Liberalist-e Ideolojik [Neither ideological socialism nor ideological liberalism], Reza Khojaste Rahimi (Interviewer). Andisheye Puya, 29–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 6th Khordad 1394 [June 2015c]. Dar Defa az Esalat-e Farhang va Naqde Siyasatzadegi; Sokhanrani dar Marasem-e Ronemai az Tarjomeye ketab-e Barabari va Janebdari asar-e Thomas Nigel [Defending the Priority of Culture and Rejecting Political Intoxication: Lecture given in Mashhad at the Ceremony Held for the Persian Translation of Thomas Nagel’s Equality and Partiality], lecture. Available at: http://neeloofar.org/abolghasemfanaei/lecture/1071-6394.html. Accessed Dec 2015.

  • ———. 29th Shahrivar 1394 [20th September 2015d]. Melliyat; Tavahom ya Vaqeiyat? Monazerei dar bab-e Melligerai [Nation: Illusion or Reality? A Debate on Nationalism], audio file and script. Available at: http://neeloofar.org/mostafamalekian/lecture/1124-290694.html. Accessed Jan 2017.

  • ———. 1395 [2017]. Ba Nasionalism-e Mobtani bar Arzesh va Davari Mokhalefam; Melligerai va Jahanvatani dar Goftegu ba Mostafa Malekian [I Disagree with Value-Judgment-based Nationalism: Nationalism and Cosmopolitanism in Dialogue with Mostafa Malekian]. Andishe Pouya. No. 40. Available at http://www.rasad.org/fa/news/121426/. Accessed Jan 2017.

  • Minton, Stephen James. July 2000. Kierkegaard and Truth as Subjectivity. In Practical Philosophy, 24–32. Available at: http://www.society-for-philosophy-in-practice.org/journal/pdf/3-2%2024%20Minton%20-%20Kierkegaard.pdf. Accessed Jan 2016.

  • Mojtahed Shabestari, Mohammad. 1375 [1996]. Naqd-e Tafakor-e Kalamiye Sonati dar Eslam-e Moaser [A Critique of Traditional Theological Thinking in Contemporary Islam]. In Hermenotik, Ketab va Sonnat [Hermeneutics, the Book and the Sunna], 183–192. Tehran: Tarh-e No.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naraghi, Arash. February 2014a. Sonnatgerayi dar Qalamro-e Din: Nazariyei Darbab-e Manteqe Eslah-e Fekr-e Dini [Traditionalism in the Religious Sphere: A Theory on the Logic of Religious Reform]. Available at: http://arashnaraghi.org/wp/?p=566. Accessed Jan 2017.

  • ———. 9th Dey 1393 [31th December 2014b]. Ayande-ye Marjaiyat-e Fekr-e Dini [The Future of Authority in Religious Thinking]. Available at: http://www.dinonline.com/doc/note/fa/4528/. Accessed Jan 2016.

  • Plato. 1991. The Republic of Plato, 2nd ed. Trans. Allan Bloom. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. Gorgias. Trans. Walter Hamilton and Chris Emlyn-Jones. Revised Edition. Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John. 1996. Political Liberalism. Paperback Edition. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1997. The Idea of Public Reason Revisited. The University of Chicago Law Review 64 (3): 765–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard. 1990. The Priority of Democracy to Philosophy. In Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth, 175–196. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, W.D. 2002 [first published in 1930]. The Right and the Good, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1939. Foundations of Ethics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadeghi-Boroujerdi, Eskandar. 2014. Mostafa Malekian: Spirituality, Siyasat-Zadegi and (A)political Self-Improvement. DOMES: Digest of Middle Eastern Studies 23 (2): 279–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soroush, Abdolkarim. 2009. Types of Religiosity. In The Expansion of Prophetic Experience. Translated by Nilou Mobasser, edited with analytical introduction by Forough Jahanbakhsh, 181–192. Leiden/Boston: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stratton-Lake, Philip. 2002. Introduction. In The Right and the Good, ed. W.D. Ross, ix–il. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Badamchi, M. (2017). Between Truth and Democracy: Mostafa Malekian’s Spiritual Intellectualism. In: Post-Islamist Political Theory. Philosophy and Politics - Critical Explorations, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59492-7_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics