Advertisement

Using Multilayer Perceptron in Computer Security to Improve Intrusion Detection

  • Flora AmatoEmail author
  • Giovanni Cozzolino
  • Antonino Mazzeo
  • Emilio Vivenzio
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 76)

Abstract

Nowadays computer and network security has become a major cause of concern for experts community, due to the growing number of devices connected to the network. For this reason, optimizing the performance of systems able to detect intrusions (IDS - Intrusion Detection System) is a goal of common interest. This paper presents a methodology to classify hacking attacks taking advantage of the generalization property of neural networks. In particular, in this work we adopt the multilayer perceptron (MLP) model with the back-propagation algorithm and the sigmoidal activation function. We analyse the results obtained using different configurations for the neural network, varying the number of hidden layers and the number of training epochs in order to obtain a low number of false positives. The obtained results will be presented in terms of type of attacks and training epochs and we will show that the best classification is carried out for DOS and Probe attacks.

Keywords

Network security Intrusion detection Multilayer perceptron Machine learning Neural networks 

References

  1. 1.
    Intrusion detection system. Wikipedia.it. https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intrusion_detection_system
  2. 2.
    Network intrusion detection system. Wikipedia.it. https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_intrusion_detection_system
  3. 3.
    Przemysaw, K., Zbigniew, K.: Adaptation of the neural network-based IDS to new attacks detection, Warsaw University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Laheeb, M.I., Dujan, T.B.: A comparison study for intrusion database. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 8(1), 107–119 (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Heba, E.I., Sherif, M.B., Mohamed, A.S.: Adaptive layered approach using machine. Int. J. Comput. Appl. (0975–8887) 56(7) (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Alfantookh, A.A.: DoS Attacks Intelligent Detection using Neural Networks. King Saud University, Arabia Saudita (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barapatre, P., Tarapore, N.: Training MLP Neural Network to Reduce False Alerts in IDS, Pune, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Minsky, M., Papert, S.A.: Perceptrons: An Introduction to Computational Geometry. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1969)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grippo, L., Sciandrone, M.: Metodi di ottimizzazione per le reti neurali, Roma, ItaliaGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    University Of California, 28 10 1999. http://kdd.ics.uci.edu/databases/kddcup99/kddcup99.html
  11. 11.
    Amato, F., Barbareschi, M., Casola, V., Mazzeo, A.: An FPGA-based smart classifier for decision support systems. Stud. Comput. Intell. 511, 289–299 (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Amato F., Barbareschi M., Casola V., Mazzeo A., Romano S.: Towards automatic generation of hardware classifiers, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 8286 LNCS (PART 2), pp. 125–132 (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Moscato, F.: Model driven engineering and verification of composite cloud services in MetaMORP(h)OSY. In: Proceedings - 2014 International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems, IEEE INCoS 2014, art. no. 7057162, pp. 635–640 (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Aversa, R., Di Martino, B., Moscato, F.: Critical systems verification in MetaMORP(h)OSY Lecture, Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 8696 LNCS, pp. 119–129 (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Minutolo, A., Esposito, M., De Pietro, G.: Development and customization of individualized mobile healthcare applications. In: 2012 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom), pp. 321–326. IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sannino, G., De Pietro, G.: An evolved ehealth monitoring system for a nuclear medicine department. In: Developments in E-systems Engineering (DeSE). IEEE (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cuomo, S., De Pietro, G., Farina, R., Galletti, A., Sannino, G.: A revised scheme for real time ecg signal denoising based on recursive filtering. Biomed. Sign. Process. Control 27, 134–144 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Coronato, A., De Pietro, G., Sannino, G.: Middleware services for pervasive monitoring elderly and ill people in smart environments. In: 2010 Seventh International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations (ITNG). IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Colace, F., De Santo, M., Greco, L.: A probabilistic approach to tweets’ sentiment classification. In: Proceedings - 2013 Humaine Association Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction, ACII 2013, art. no. 6681404, pp. 37–42 (2013)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Colace, F., Foggia, P., Percannella, G.: A probabilistic framework for TV-news stories detection and classification. In: IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, ICME 2005, art. no. 1521680, pp. 1350–1353 (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Flora Amato
    • 1
    Email author
  • Giovanni Cozzolino
    • 1
  • Antonino Mazzeo
    • 1
  • Emilio Vivenzio
    • 1
  1. 1.DIETI - Dipartimento di Ingegneria Elettrica E Tecnologie Dell’InformazioneUniversità degli studi di Napoli “Federico II”NaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations