Re-evaluation of Decisions Based on Events

  • Luise Pufahl
  • Sankalita Mandal
  • Kimon Batoulis
  • Mathias Weske
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 287)

Abstract

Business operations include decisions having impact on their success and performance. The digital world provides access to massive amount of data being relevant in decision making. After a decision, often succeeding activities are not immediately started or preparation activities are conducted. Meanwhile new information could be received which lead to a different decision output. Considering this can save organizations process cost or flow time. In this paper, we provide a concept to realize the re-evaluation of decisions based on event processing. We integrated a re-evaluation scope in business processes in which change of decision is still accepted and which dynamically subscribes to those events leading to new decision output. The concept is evaluated by a proof-of concept implementation and a single-case experiment on a logistic use case. There, re-evaluation was relevant for almost a quarter of the transports reducing the traveling time.

Keywords

BPMN DMN Re-evaluation Event processing 

References

  1. 1.
    Batoulis, K., Meyer, A., Bazhenova, E., Decker, G., Weske, M.: Extracting decision logic from process models. In: Zdravkovic, J., Kirikova, M., Johannesson, P. (eds.) CAiSE 2015. LNCS, vol. 9097, pp. 349–366. Springer, Cham (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19069-3_22 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bazhenova, E., Buelow, S., Weske, M.: Discovering decision models from event logs. In: Abramowicz, W., Alt, R., Franczyk, B. (eds.) BIS 2016. LNBIP, vol. 255, pp. 237–251. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-39426-8_19 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bülow, S., Backmann, M., Herzberg, N., Hille, T., Meyer, A., Ulm, B., Wong, T.Y., Weske, M.: Monitoring of business processes with complex event processing. In: Lohmann, N., Song, M., Wohed, P. (eds.) BPM 2013. LNBIP, vol. 171, pp. 277–290. Springer, Cham (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-06257-0_22 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Calvanese, D., Dumas, M., Laurson, Ü., Maggi, F.M., Montali, M., Teinemaa, I.: Semantics and analysis of dmn decision tables. arXiv preprint (2016). arXiv:1603.07466
  5. 5.
    Camunda: camunda BPM Platform. https://www.camunda.org/
  6. 6.
    Döhring, M., Karg, L., Godehardt, E., Zimmermann, B.: The convergence of workflows, business rules and complex events. In: 12th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, pp. 338–343 (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    EsperTech: Esper Event Processing Language EPL. http://www.espertech.com/esper/release-5.4.0/esper-reference/html/
  8. 8.
    Etzion, O., Niblett, P.: Event Processing in Action. Manning Publications Co., Greenwich (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hermosillo, G., Seinturier, L., Duchien, L.: Creating context-adaptive business processes. In: Maglio, P.P., Weske, M., Yang, J., Fantinato, M. (eds.) ICSOC 2010. LNCS, vol. 6470, pp. 228–242. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-17358-5_16 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Herzberg, N., Meyer, A., Weske, M.: An event processing platform for business process management. In: EDOC. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Knöpfel, A., Gröne, B., Tabeling, P.: Fundamental Modeling Concepts: Effective Communication of IT Systems. Wiley, San Francisco (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Krumeich, J., Weis, B., Werth, D., Loos, P.: Event-driven business process management: where are we now? Bus. Process Manage. J. 20(4), 615–633 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Li, J., Mirchandani, P.B., Borenstein, D.: The vehicle rescheduling problem: model and algorithms. Networks 50(3), 211–229 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    OMG: Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN), Version 2.0., January 2011Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    OMG: Decision Model and Notation (DMN), Version 1.1., June 2016Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Patiniotakis, I., Papageorgiou, N., Verginadis, Y., Apostolou, D., Mentzas, G.: An aspect oriented approach for implementing situational driven adaptation of BPMN2.0 workflows. In: Rosa, M., Soffer, P. (eds.) BPM 2012. LNBIP, vol. 132, pp. 414–425. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-36285-9_44 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Reichert, M., Weber, B.: Enabling Flexibility in Process-Aware Information Systems: Challenges, Methods, Technologies. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Verginadis, Y., Papageorgiou, N., Patiniotakis, I., Apostolou, D., Mentzas, G.: A goal driven dynamic event subscription approach. In: Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Conference on Distributed Event-Based Systems, pp. 81–84. ACM (2012)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vieira, G.E., Herrmann, J.W., Lin, E.: Rescheduling manufacturing systems: a framework of strategies, policies, and methods. J. Sched. 6(1), 39–62 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Weidlich, M., Ziekow, H., Mendling, J., Günther, O., Weske, M., Desai, N.: Event-based monitoring of process execution violations. In: Rinderle-Ma, S., Toumani, F., Wolf, K. (eds.) BPM 2011. LNCS, vol. 6896, pp. 182–198. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-23059-2_16 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Weske, M.: Business Process Management: Concepts, Languages, Architectures, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wieringa, R.J.: Design Science Methodology for Information Systems and Software Engineering. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luise Pufahl
    • 1
  • Sankalita Mandal
    • 1
  • Kimon Batoulis
    • 1
  • Mathias Weske
    • 1
  1. 1.Hasso Plattner Institute at the University of PotsdamPotsdamGermany

Personalised recommendations