Skip to main content

Colonoscopic Polypectomy: Current Techniques and Controversies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Colon Polypectomy

Abstract

Colonoscopic polypectomy is an efficacious method for the prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC); indeed, removing cancer precursor polyps reduces CRC incidence and mortality. Several techniques that have been developed to remove polyps are selected according to the polyp size, shape, and type. The goals of colonoscopic polypectomy are complete resection and retrieval of precancerous lesions in a safe way.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, O’Brien MJ, Gottlieb LS, Sternberg SS, Waye JD, Schapiro M, Bond JH, Panish JF, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(27):1977–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, van Ballegooijen M, Hankey BF, Shi W, Bond JH, Schapiro M, Panish JF, Stewart ET, Waye JD. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(8):687–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Wolff WI, Shinya H. Polypectomy via the fiberoptic colonoscope. Removal of neoplasms beyond reach of the sigmoidoscope. N Engl J Med. 1973;288(7):329–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rex DK. Have we defined best colonoscopic polypectomy practice in the United States? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5:674–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hewett DG, Rex DK. Colonoscopy and diminutive polyps: hot or cold biopsy or snare? Do I send to pathology? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9:102–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pattullo V, Bourke MJ, Tran KL, et al. The suction pseudopolyp technique: a novel method for the removal of small flat nonpolypoid lesions of the colon and rectum. Endoscopy. 2009;41:1032.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Singh N, Harrison M, Rex DK. A survey of colonoscopic polypectomy practices among clinical gastroenterologists. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;99:414–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gupta S, Anderson J, Bhandari P, et al. Development and validation of a novel method for assessing competency in polypectomy: direct observation of polypectomy skills. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:1232–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gupta S, Bassett P, Man R, et al. Validation of a novel method for assessing competency in polypectomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75:568–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pabby A, Schoen RE, Weissfeld JL, Burt R, Kikendall JW, Lance P, Shike M, Lanza E, Schatzkin A. Analysis of colorectal cancer occurrence during surveillance colonoscopy in the dietary polyp prevention trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61(3):385–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Farrar WD, Sawhney MS, Nelson DB, Lederle FA, Bond JH. Colorectal cancers found after a complete colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;4(10):1259–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Park HJ. Endoscopic instruments and electrosurgical unit for colonoscopic polypectomy. Clin Endosc. 2016;49:350–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Kedia P, Waye JD. Colon polypectomy: a review of routine and advanced techniques. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2013;47(8):657–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Carter D, Beer-Gabel M, Eliakim R, Novis B, Avidan B, Bardan E. Management of antithrombotic agents for colonoscopic polypectomies in Israeli gastroenterologists relative to published guidelines. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2013;37(5):514–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Weinberg DS. Large adenoma recurrence after polypectomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:350–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bae GH, Jung JT, Kwon JG, et al. Risk factors of delayed bleeding after colonoscopic polypectomy: case-control study. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2012;59:423–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bourke M. Current status of colonic endoscopic mucosal resection in the west and the interface with endoscopic submucosal dissection. Dig Endosc. 2009;21(Suppl 1):S22–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lambert R, Kudo SE, Vieth M, et al. Pragmatic classification of superficial colorectal neoplastic lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:1182–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Participants in the Paris Workshop. The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58(Suppl 6):S3–43.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Endoscopic Classification Review Group. Update on the Paris classification of superficial neoplastic lesions in the digestive tract. Endoscopy. 2005;37(6):570–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Macrae FA. Approach to the patient with colonic polyps. UpToDate. 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rex DK. Preventing colorectal cancer and cancer mortality with colonoscopy: what we know and what we don’t know. Endoscopy. 2010;42:320–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Draganov PV, Chang MN, Alkhasawneh A, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of standard, large-capacity versus jumbo biopsy forceps for polypectomy of small, sessile, colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75:118–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Uraoka T, Matsuda T, Sano Y, et al. Polypectomy using jumbo biopsy forceps for small colorectal polyps: a multicenter prospective trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:AB564.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lee CK, Shim JJ, Jang JY. Cold snare polypectomy vs. cold forceps polypectomy using double-biopsy technique for removal of diminutive colorectal polyps: a prospective randomized study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:1593–600.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Woods A, Sanowski RA, Wadas DD, et al. Eradication of diminutive polyps: a prospective evaluation of bipolar coagulation versus conventional biopsy removal. Gastrointest Endosc. 1989;35:536–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Draganov PV, Chang MN, Lieb J, et al. Randomized controlled trial of two types of biopsy forceps for polypectomy of small sessile colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:AB194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jung YS, Park JH, Kim HJ, et al. Complete biopsy resection of diminutive polyps. Endoscopy. 2013;45:1024–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Monkemuller KE, Fry LC, Jones BH, Wells C, Mikolaenko I, Eloubeidi M. Histological quality of polyps resected using the cold versus hot biopsy technique. Endoscopy. 2004;36:432–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee SH, Shin SJ, Park DI, et al. Korean guideline for colonoscopic polypectomy. Clin Endosc. 2012;45:11–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Komeda Y, Kashida H, Sakurai T, Tribonias G, Okamoto K, Kono M, Yamada M, Adachi T, Mine H, Nagai T, Asakuma Y, Hagiwara S, Matsui S, Watanabe T, Kitano M, Chikugo T, Chiba Y, Kudo M. Removal of diminutive colorectal polyps: a prospective randomized clinical trial between cold snare polypectomy and hot forceps biopsy. World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23(2):328–35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Hewett DG. Colonoscopic polypectomy: current techniques and controversies. Gastroenterol Clin N Am. 2013;42:443–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Yamano H, Matsushita H, Yamanaka K, et al. A study of physical efficacy of different snares for endoscopic mucosal resection. Dig Endosc. 2004;16(Suppl 1):S85–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Deenadayalu VP, Rex DK. Colon polyp retrieval after cold snaring. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62:253–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Uraoka T, Ramberan H, Matsuda T, Fujii T, Yahagi N. Cold polypectomy techniques for diminutive polyps in the colorectum. Dig Endosc. 2014;26(Suppl. 2):98–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Paspatis GA, Tribonias G, Konstantinidis K, et al. A prospective randomized comparison of cold vs hot snare polypectomy in the occurrence of postpolypectomy bleeding in small colonic polyps. Colorectal Dis. 2011;13:e345–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Repici A, Hassan C, Vitetta E, et al. Safety of cold polypectomy for <10 mm polyps at colonoscopy: a prospective multicenter study. Endoscopy. 2012;44:27–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ferlitsch M, Moss A, Hassan C, Bhandari P, Dumonceau JM, Paspatis G, Jover R, Langner C, Bronzwaer M, Nalankilli K, Fockens P, Hazzan R, Gralnek IM, Gschwantler M, Waldmann E, Jeschek P, Penz D, Heresbach D, Moons L, Lemmers A, Paraskeva K, Pohl J, Ponchon T, Regula J, Repici A, Rutter MD, Burgess NG, Bourke MJ. Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society Of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) clinical guideline. Endoscopy. 2017;49(3):270–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Morris ML, Tucker RD, Baron TH, et al. Electrosurgery in gastrointestinal endoscopy: principles to practice. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:1563–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Van Gossum A, Cozzoli A, Adler M, et al. Colonoscopic snare polypectomy: analysis of 1485 resections comparing two types of current. Gastrointest Endosc. 1992;38:472–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Seitz U, Bohnacker S, Binmoeller KF. Endoscopic removal of large colon polyps. UpToDate. 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Friedland S, Kothari S, Chen A, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection with an over the counter hyaluronate preparation. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75:1040.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Katsinelos P, Kountouras J, Paroutoglou G, et al. A comparative study of 50% dextrose and normal saline solution on their ability to create submucosal fluid cushions for endoscopic resection of sessile rectosigmoid polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;68:692.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Moss A, Bourke MJ, Metz AJ. A randomized, double-blind trial of succinylated gelatin submucosal injection for endoscopic resection of large sessile polyps of the colon. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:2375.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Fasoulas K, Lazaraki G, Chatzimavroudis G, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection of giant laterally spreading tumors with submucosal injection of hydroxyethyl starch: comparative study with normal saline solution. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012;22:272.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Muscatiello N, Facciorusso A. Use of polidocanol in colon polypectomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83(1):271.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Dobrowolski S, Dobosz M, Babicki A, et al. Blood supply of colorectal polyps correlates with risk of bleeding after colonoscopic polypectomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63:1004–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Iishi H, Tatsuta M, Narahara H, Iseki K, Sakai N. Endoscopic resection of large pedunculated colorectal polyps using a detachable snare. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996 Nov;44(5):594–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Ji J-S, Lee S-W, Kim TH, et al. Comparison of prophylactic clip and endoloop application for the prevention of postpolypectomy bleeding in pedunculated colonic polyps: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study. Endoscopy. 2014;46:598–604.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Fry LC, Lazenby AJ, Mikolaenko I, Barranco B, Rickes S, Mönkemüller K. Diagnostic quality of polyps resected by snare polypectomy: does the type of electrosurgical current used matter? Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101(9):2123–7. Epub 2006 Jul 18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Ko CW, Dominitz JA. Complications of colonoscopy: magnitude and management. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2010;20:659–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Binmoeller KF, Weilert F, Shah J, Bhat Y, Kane S. “Underwater” EMR without submucosal injection for large sessile colorectal polyps (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75(5):1086–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Wu J, Hu B. The role of carbon dioxide insufflation in colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2012;44:128–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Hsu WF, Hu WH, Chen YN, et al. Carbon dioxide insufflation can significantly reduce toilet use after colonoscopy: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy. 2014;46:190–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Buchner AM, Guarner-Argente C, Ginsberg GG. Outcomes of EMR of defiant colorectal lesions directed to an endoscopy referral center. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:255–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Leung K, Pinsky P, Laiyemo AO, et al. Ongoing colorectal cancer risk despite surveillance colonoscopy: the polyp prevention trial continued follow-up study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:111–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Pohl H, Srivastava A, Bensen SP, Anderson P, Rothstein RI, Gordon SR, Levy LC, Toor A, Mackenzie TA, Rosch T, Robertson DJ. Incomplete polyp resection during colonoscopy—results of the complete adenoma resection (CARE) study. Gastroenterology. 2013;144(1):74–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Robertson DJ, Lieberman DA, Winawer SJ, et al. Interval cancer after total colonoscopy: results from a pooled analysis of eight studies. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:A-111–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Hewett DG, Kahi CJ, Rex DK. Efficacy and effectiveness of colonoscopy: how do we bridge the gap? Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2010;20:673–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Adler A, Wegscheider K, Lieberman D, et al. Factors determining the quality of screening colonoscopy: a prospective study on adenoma detection rates, from 12 134 examinations (Berlin colonoscopy project 3, BECOP-3). Gut. 2013;62:236–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Tsai FC. Strum WB. Prevalence of advanced adenomas in small and diminutive colon polyps using direct measurement of size. Dig Dis Sci. 2011;56(8):2384–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E, Polkowski M, Wojciechowska U, Didkowska J, Zwierko M, Rupinski M, Nowacki MP, Butruk E. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(19):1795–803.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Komeda Y, Suzuki N, Sarah M, et al. Factors associated with failed polyp retrieval at screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:395–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Fernandes C, Pinho R, Ribeiro I, Silva J, Ponte A, Carvalho J. Risk factors for polyp retrieval failure in colonoscopy. United European Gastroenterol J. 2015;3(4):387–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050640615572041.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Rex DK, Kahi C, O’Brien M, Levin TR, Pohl H, Rastogi A, Burgart L, Imperiale T, Ladabaum U, Cohen J, Lieberman DA. The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy PIVI (preservation and incorporation of valuable endoscopic innovations) on real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73(3):419–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Belderbos TD, van Oijen MG, Moons LM, Siersema PD. The “golden retriever” study: improving polyp retrieval rates by providing education and competitive feedback. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83(3):596–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2015.07.018. Epub 2015 Aug 29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Misra SP, Dwivedi M. Colonoscopy and colonoscopic polypectomy using side-viewing endoscope: a useful, effective and safe procedure. Dig Dis Sci. 2008;53:1285–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Frimberger E, von Delius S, Rosch T, et al. Colonoscopy and polypectomy with a side-viewing endoscope. Endoscopy. 2007;39:462–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Burgess NG, Bahin FF, Bourke MJ. Colonic polypectomy (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81(4):813–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Zafar A, Mustafa M, Chapman M. Colorectal polyps: when should we tattoo? Surg Endosc. 2012;26(11):3264–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Kang HJ, Lee BI, Kim BW, Choi H, Cho SH, Choi KY, Chae HS, Han SW, Chung IS, Kim KM. Potential cancer cell inoculation of tattoo site through use of a contaminated needle. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63(6):884–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Fasoli A, Pugliese V, Gatteschi B, et al. Endocytoscopic imaging and tattooing: a caveat. Endoscopy. 2009;41(Suppl 2):E41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Adler DG. Tattooing and other methods for localizing colonic lesions. UptoDate. 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Sawaki A, Nakamura T, Suzuki T, Hara K, Kato T, Kato T, Hirai T, Kanemitsu Y, Okubo K, Tanaka K, Moriyama I, Kawai H, Katsurahara M, Matsumoto K, Yamao K. A twostep method for marking polypectomy sites in the colon and rectum. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;57:735–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Matsushita M, Takakuwa H, Matsubayashi Y. Effective endoscopic tattooing technique. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60:165–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Hammond DC, Lane FR, Welk RA, Madura MJ, Borreson DK, Passinault WJ. Endoscopic tattooing of the colon. An experimental study. Am Surg. 1989;55(7):457–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Gianom D, Hollinger A, Wirth HP. Intestinal perforation after preoperative colonic tattooing with India ink. Swiss Surg. 2003;9(6):307–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Park SI, Genta RS, Romeo DP, Weesner RE. Colonic abscess and focal peritonitis secondary to India ink tattooing of the colon. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;37(1):68–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Coman E, Brandt LJ, Brenner S, Frank M, Sablay B, Bennett B. Fat necrosis and inflammatory pseudotumor due to endoscopic tattooing of the colon with India ink. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;37(1):65–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Singh S, Arif A, Fox C, Basnyat P. Complication after pre-operative India ink tattooing in a colonic lesion. Dig Surg. 2006;23(5–6):303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Hellmig S, Stüber E, Kiehne K, Fölsch UR. Unusual course of colonic tattooing with India ink. Surg Endosc. 2003;17(3):521.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Yano H, Okada K, Monden T. Adhesion ileus caused by tattoo-marking: unusual complication after laparoscopic surgery for early colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46(7):987.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Alba LM, Pandya PK, Clarkston WK. Rectus muscle abscess associated with endoscopic tattooing of the colon with India ink. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;52(4):557–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Askin MP, Waye JD, Fiedler L, Harpaz N. Tattoo of colonic neoplasms in 113 patients with a new sterile carbon compound. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56(3):339–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabio Monica .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Monica, F., Pecoraro, G.M. (2018). Colonoscopic Polypectomy: Current Techniques and Controversies. In: Facciorusso, A., Muscatiello, N. (eds) Colon Polypectomy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59457-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59457-6_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59456-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59457-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics