Skip to main content

Analysis of Big Data in Colonoscopy to Determine Whether Inverval Lesions are De Novo, Missed or Incompletely Removed

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Smart Education and e-Learning 2017 (SEEL 2017)

Part of the book series: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies ((SIST,volume 75))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2374 Accesses

Abstract

We have created a system that automatically records the inside-the-patient images of each colonoscopy in de-identified fashion. At present this “big data” database contains around 100 TB of de-identified endoscopy data. Interval colorectal cancers (CRCs) are CRCs that develop despite periodic colonoscopy and are due to de novo tumor growth, a missed lesion or incomplete lesion removal. Using a combination of location, date, time and image information we were able to find a video file within our de-identified big data from a prior colonoscopy that belonged to a patient with a recently diagnosed large interval lesion. Analysis of the video file showed that a large lesion was incompletely removed. Analysis of big endoscopy datasets has the potential to resolve the cause of most if not all interval lesions and CRCs and can provide specific, focused education to endoscopists related to their individual limitations.

Piet de Groen has a financial interest in EndoMetric INC, a company that analyzes colonoscopy video streams for features of quality. Wallapak Tavanapong, JungHwan Oh and Johnny Wong have a financial interest, hold an equity position and hold a position in EndoMetric INC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Siegel, R.L., et al.: Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J. Clin. 66, 7–30 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brenner, H., et al.: Protection from right- and left-sided colorectal neoplasms after colonoscopy: population-based study. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 102, 89–95 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Baxter, N.N., et al.: Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer. Ann. Intern. Med. 150, 1–8 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. De Groen, P., et al.: Real-Time feedback during colonoscopy to improve quality: how often to improve inspection? In: Uskov, V.L., et al. (eds.) Smart Education and Smart e-Learning, vol. 41. pp. 501–512. Springer (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Adler, J., Robertson, D.J.: Interval colorectal cancer after colonoscopy: exploring explanations and solutions. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 110, 1657–1664 (2015). quiz 1665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zauber, A.G., et al.: Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N. Engl. J. Med. 366, 687–696 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nishihara, R., et al.: Long-term colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality after lower endoscopy. N. Engl. J. Med. 369, 1095–1105 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Corley, D.A., et al.: Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. New Engl. J. Med. 370, 1298–1306 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. De Groen, P.C.: Polyps, pain and propofol: is water exchange the panacea for all? Am. J. Gastroenterol. 112, 578–580 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rex, D.K., et al.: Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 110, 72–90 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Aggarwal, R. et al.: Simulation research in gastrointestinal and urologic care – challenges and opportunities: summary of a national institute of diabetes and digestive and kidney diseases and national institute of biomedical imaging and bioengineering workshop. Ann. Surg. (2017). In press

    Google Scholar 

  12. Oh, J., et al.: Measuring objective quality of colonoscopy. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 56, 2190–2196 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Thackeray, E., et al.: Quality of colonoscopy depends on the quality of the endoscopist. Am. J. Gastroentero 106, S520 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Liu, D., et al.: Arthemis: annotation software in an integrated capturing and analysis system for colonoscopy. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 88, 152–163 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Piet C. de Groen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

de Groen, P.C., Tavanapong, W., Oh, J., Wong, J. (2018). Analysis of Big Data in Colonoscopy to Determine Whether Inverval Lesions are De Novo, Missed or Incompletely Removed. In: Uskov, V., Howlett, R., Jain, L. (eds) Smart Education and e-Learning 2017. SEEL 2017. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 75. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59451-4_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59451-4_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59450-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59451-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics