Skip to main content

Essential Requirements for Setting Up a Stem Cell Processing Laboratory

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Establishing a Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Unit

Abstract

Ensuring the reliable processing of a high-quality stem cell graft is one of the key elements in the success of a stem cell transplant. In order to achieve this, the critical processes performed in any stem cell processing facility are:

  • Overseeing the safe receipt/handling of donor stem cells

  • Defining the product: its quality and characteristics

  • Determining what, if any, manipulation is required for the transplant

  • Ensuring product safety, including testing for infectious diseases as well as safe transport and delivery of the cells back to the hospital/patient

  • Maintaining full traceability of the graft product.

In order to achieve this aim, the establishment of a robust stem cell processing facility requires careful planning of the building and design, including an understanding of the anticipated clinical workload and the projected future transplant activity of the program. This would then influence the determination of the physical space required and allow for growth. Also, the processing costs must be factored into the final calculation of the cost or revenue of a transplant episode, as this will inform all financial calculations.

The facility should also be clear about the range of processing capabilities to be undertaken and required by the clinical program, as this will underpin all the training required for the laboratory staff. The range of processing capabilities will evolve as the program grows both in numbers and complexity, requiring the consideration of automation and greater ex-vivo manipulation of the graft.

It is also important to factor in a quality system from the outset that anchors all processes in the facility with clearly defined standard operating procedures and attention to safety. This system should incorporate incident reporting and some form of audits.

Regulatory compliance requirements will vary greatly between countries. In general, a solid quality plan that addresses all local regulations, adherence to the principles of that plan, and documentation to support that adherence will likely allow the laboratory to comply with the regulatory frameworks.

It is important to have a close relationship with the clinical transplant program, as the quality and content of the graft is an essential parameter in determining engraftment and immune reconstitution, as well as in determining the incidence of graft-versus-host disease and relapse. The laboratory should therefore be represented at clinical transplant planning meetings so that expected collection dates and transplant dates are clearly communicated, and the laboratory staff has access to engraftment data that can, and must, be correlated with the stem cell collection data (CD34 count, total nucleated dose, and viability). This involvement of laboratory staff will assure that the clinical outcomes match the reliability of processing and can also serve to indicate whether processing standards are sub-optimal.

Cell processing is becoming increasingly commonplace as cell-based therapy is diversifying out of hematolo-oncology and into regenerative medicine. These developments are likely to intersect with the traditional functions of the stem cell graft processing laboratories, but will present opportunities for the expansion of work and the support of a wider range of activites. Laboratories will also likely be presented with novel challenges requiring ever more robust quality systems and specialized staff. Regulations will also need to evolve to encompass these more complex cell therapy products.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Leemhuis T, Padley D, Keever-Taylor C, Niederwieser D, Teshima T, Lanza F, Chabannon C, Szabolcs P, Bazarbachi A, Koh MBC. Essential requirements for setting up a stem cell processing laboratory. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2014;49:1098.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Matsumoto N, Yoshizawa H, Kagamu H, Abe T, Fujita N, Watanabe S, et al. Successful liquid storage of peripheral blood stem cells at subzero non-freezing temperature. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2002;30:777–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cabezudo E, Dalmases C, Ruz M, Sanchez JA, Torrico C, Sola C, et al. Leukapheresis components may be cryopreserved at high cell concentrations without additional loss of HPC function. Transfusion. 2000;40:1223–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Leemhuis T, Sacher R. Hematopoietic progenitor cells: biology and processing. In: Simon T, Snyder E, Solheim B, Stowell C, Strauss R, Petrides M, editors. Rossi’s principles of transfusion medicine. 4th ed. West Sussex: Wiley Blackwell; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rowley SD, Feng Z, Chen L, et al. A randomized phase III clinical trial of autologous blood stem cell transplantation comparing cryopreservation using dimethylsulfoxide versus dimethylsulfoxide with hydroxyethylstarch. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2003;31:1043–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Costa R, Khattab M, Gilmore GL, Sahovic EA, Miller SM, Rossetti JM, et al. Viability and potency of hematopoietic progenitor cells after prolonged cryopreservation at −80°C. Acta Haematol. 2011;126:99–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Makino S, Harada M, Akashi K, Taniguchi S, Shibuya T, Inaba S, Niho Y. A simplified method for cryopreservation of peripheral blood stem cells at −80 degrees C without rate-controlled freezing. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1991;8:239–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. McCullough J, Haley R, Clay M, Hubel A, Lindgren B, Moroff G. Long-term storage of peripheral blood stem cells frozen and stored with a conventional liquid nitrogen technique compared with cells frozen and stored in a mechanical freezer. Transfusion. 2010;50:808–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Watts MJ, Sullivan AM, Ings SJ, Barlow M, Devereux S, Goldstone AH, Linch DC. Storage of PBSC at -80°C. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1998;21:111–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rowley SD, Anderson GL. Effect of DMSO exposure without cryopreservation on hematopoietic progenitor cells. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1993;11:389–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rubinstein P, Dobrila L, Rosenfield RE, Adamson JW, Migliaccio G, Migliaccio AR, Taylor PE, Stevens CE. Processing and cryopreservation of placental/umbilical cord blood for unrelated bone marrow reconstitution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92:10119–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Sanchez-Salinas A, Cabanas-Perianes V, Blanquer M, Majado MJ, Insausti CL, Monserrat J, et al. An automatic wash method for dimethylsulfoxide removal in autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation decreases the adverse effects related to infusion. Transfusion. 2012;52:2382–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Windrum P, Morris TC, Drake MB, Niederwieser D, Ruutu T, on behalf of the EBMT Chronic Leukaemia Working Party Complications Subcommittee. Variation in dimethyl sulfoxide use in stem cell transplantation: a survey of EBMT centres. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2005;36:601–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Larghero J, Rea D, Esperou H, Biscay N, Maure M-N, Lacassagne M-N, et al. ABO-mismatched marrow processing for transplantation: results of 114 procedures and analysis of immediate adverse events and hematopoietic recovery. Transfusion. 2006;46:398–402.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wuest DL, Reich LM. Removal of ABO-incompatible red cells from lymphocytapheresis and granulocytapheresis components before transfusion. Transfusion. 1997;37:144–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rowley SD. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation between red cell incompatible donor-recipient pairs. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2001;28:315–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bandarenko M, Sims LC, Brecher ME. Circulating CD34+ cell counts are predictive of CD34 peripheral blood progenitor cell yields (letter). Transfusion. 1997;37:1218–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kozuka T, Ikeda K, Teshima T, Kojima K, Matsuo K, Bessho A, et al. Predictive value of circulating immature cell counts in peripheral blood for timing of peripheral blood progenitor cell collection after G-CSF plus chemotherapy-induced mobilization. Transfusion. 2002;42:1514–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Teshima T, Sunami K, Bessho A, Shinagawa K, Omoto E, Ueoka H, et al. Circulating immature cell counts on the harvest day predict the yields of CD34+ cells collected after G-CSF plus chemotherapy-induced mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells. Blood. 1997;89:4660–1.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Krause D, Fackler MJ, Civin CI, May WS. CD34: structure, biology and clinical utility. Blood. 1996;81:1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Keeney M, Chin-Yee I, Weir K, et al. Single platform flow cytometric absolute CD34+ cell counts based on the ISHAGE guidelines. Cytometry. 1998;34:61–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Keeney M, Brown W, Gratama J, Papa S, Lanza F, Sutherland R. Single platform enumeration of viable CD34+ cells. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2003;17:247–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sutherland DR, Anderson L, Keeney M, Nayar R, Chin-Yee I. The ISHAGE guidelines for CD34+ cell determination by flow cytometry. International Society of Hematotherapy and Graft Engineering. J Hematother. 1996;5:213–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Burger SR. Design and operation of a current good manufacturing practices cell engineering laboratory. Cytotherapy. 2000;2:11–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bolton-Maggs PH. The 2015 SHOT symposium and report-what’s new. Transfus Med. 2015;5:295–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lowdell MW, Bainbridge DR. External quality assurance for CD34 cell enumeration - the results of a preliminary national trial. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1996;17:840–53.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mickey B. C. Koh M.D., Ph.D .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Koh, M.B.C., Lowdell, M., Leemhuis, T. (2018). Essential Requirements for Setting Up a Stem Cell Processing Laboratory. In: Gluckman, É., Niederwieser, D., Aljurf, M. (eds) Establishing a Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Unit . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59358-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59358-6_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59356-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59358-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics