You Are What You Eat: The Interplay Between Animal Personality and Foraging Ecology

  • Sandra M. Troxell-Smith
  • Valentina S. A. Mella
Chapter

Abstract

Foraging animals face a constant dilemma—balancing the need to acquire food without putting themselves at risk. Individuals within a population vary in personality, and as a consequence they differ in how they perceive, interpret, and respond to foraging choices. Despite the inherent necessity for animals to acquire food, and thus direct link to fitness, the interplay between foraging and animal personality has received little attention. In this chapter, we first summarize studies that have integrated animal personality and foraging decisions in wild and captive populations, then highlight research deficiencies and suggest future research opportunities to unite the study of personality and foraging ecology. We also introduce and discuss patch-use theory as a specific research methodology that may help to facilitate future assessment of individual foraging differences. We believe that further investigation into the influence of personality on individual foraging decisions is key to understanding a valuable and largely understudied aspect of overall animal success and the ecological consequences of personality.

Keywords

Foraging ecology Animal personality Individual differences Foraging decisions Captive species Wild species Giving-up density/GUD 

References

  1. Altendorf, K. B., Laundré, J. W., Lopez Gonzalez, C. A., & Brown, J. S. (2001). Assessing effects of predation risk on foraging behavior of mule deer. Journal of Mammalogy, 82, 430–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arvidsson, L. K., & Matthysen, E. (2016). Individual differences in foraging decisions: Information-gathering strategies or flexibility? Behavioral Ecology, 27, 1353–1361.Google Scholar
  3. Baird, R. W., Abrams, P. A., & Dill, L. M. (1992). Possible indirect interactions between transient and resident killer whales: Implications for the evolution of foraging specializations in the genus Orcinus. Oecologia, 89, 125–132.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Baker, K., & Pullen, P. K. (2013). The impact of housing and husbandry on the personality of cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus). Journal of Zoo and Aquarium Research, 1, 35–40.Google Scholar
  5. Bedoya-Perez, M. A., Carthey, A. J. R., Mella, V. S. A., McArthur, C., & Banks, P. B. (2013). A practical guide to avoid giving up on giving-up densities. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 67, 1541–1553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bell, A. M. (2007). Future directions in behavioural syndromes research. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 274, 755–761.Google Scholar
  7. Berger-Tal, O., Mukherjee, S., Kotler, B. P., & Brown, J. S. (2010). State of emergency: Behavior of gerbils is affected by the hunger state of their predators. Ecology, 91, 593–600.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bergvall, U. A., Schäpers, A., Kjellander, P., & Weiss, A. (2011). Personality and foraging decisions in fallow deer, Dama dama. Animal Behaviour, 81, 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Biro, P. A., & Stamps, J. A. (2008). Are animal personality traits linked to life-history productivity? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 23, 361–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boon, A., Reale, D., & Boutin, S. (2008). Personality, habitat use, and their consequences for survival in North American red squirrels Tamiasciurus hudsonicus. Oikos, 117, 1321–1328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Both, C., Dingemanse, N. J., Drent, P. J., & Tinbergen, J. M. (2005). Pairs of extreme avian personalities have highest reproductive success. Journal of Animal Ecology, 74, 667–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bremner-Harrison, S., Prodohl, P. A., & Elwood, R. W. (2004). Behavioural trait assessment as a release criterion: Boldness predicts early death in a reintroduction programme of captive-bred swift fox (Vulpes velox). Animal Conservation, 7, 313–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown, J. (1988). Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk, and competition. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 22, 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brown, J. S., Morgan, R. A., & Dow, B. D. (1992). Patch use under prédation risk: A test with fox squirrels, Sciurus niger. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 29, 311–318.Google Scholar
  15. Careau, V., & Garland, T., Jr. (2012). Performance, personality, and energetics: Correlation, causation, and mechanism. Physiological and Biochemical Zoology, 85, 543–571.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Careau, V., Thomas, D., Humphries, M., & Réale, D. (2008). Energy metabolism and animal personality. Oikos, 117, 641–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Charnov, E. L. (1976). Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. Theoretical Population Biology, 9, 129–136.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Clark, A. B., & Ehlinger, T. J. (1987). Pattern and adaptation in individual behavioral differences. In P. P. G. Bateson & P. Klopfer (Eds.), Perspectives in Ethology (Vol. 7, pp. 1–47). Springer US.Google Scholar
  19. Dall, S. R. X., Houston, A. I., & McNamara, J. M. (2004). The behavioural ecology of personality: Consistent individual differences from an adaptive perspective. Ecology Letters, 7, 734–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dammhahn, M., & Almeling, L. (2012). Is risk taking during foraging a personality trait? A field test for cross-context consistency in boldness. Animal Behaviour, 84, 1131–1139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dingemanse, N. J., Both, C., van Noordwijk, A. J., Rutten, A. L., & Drent, P. J. (2003). Natal dispersal and personalities in great tits (Parus major). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 270, 741–747.Google Scholar
  22. Dukas, R. (1998). Evolutionary ecology of learning. In R. Dukas (Ed.), Cognitive ecology: The evolutionary ecology of information processing and decision making (pp. 129–164). University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  23. Dyer, J. R. G., Croft, D. P., Morrell, L. J., & Krause, J. (2009). Shoal composition determines foraging success in the guppy. Behavioral Ecology, 20, 165–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Estes, J. A., Riedman, M. L., Staedler, M. M., Tinker, M. T., & Lyon, B. E. (2003). Individual variation in prey selection by sea otters: Patterns, causes and implications. Journal of Animal Ecology, 72, 144–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Favati, A., Leimar, O., & Løvlie, H. (2014). Personality predicts social dominance in male domestic fowl. PLoS ONE, 9, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Garamszegi, L. Z., Erritzøe, J., & Møller, A. P. (2007). Feeding inovations and parasitism in birds. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 90, 441–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gartner, M. C., Powell, D. M., & Weiss, A. (2016). Comparison of subjective well being and personality assessments in the Clouded Leopard (Neofelis nebulosa), Snow Leopard (Panthera uncia), and African Lion (Panthera leo). Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 19, 294–302.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Gende, S. M., & Quinn, T. P. (2004). The relative importance of prey density and social dominance in determining energy intake by bears feeding on Pacific salmon. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 82, 75–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. González-Bernal, E., Brown, G. P., & Shine, R. (2014). Invasive cane toads: Social facilitation depends upon an individual’s personality. PLoS ONE, 9, e102880.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Grand, A. P., Kuhar, C. W., Leighty, K. A., Bettinger, T. L., & Laudenslager, M. L. (2012). Using personality ratings and cortisol to characterize individual differences in African Elephants (Loxodonta africana). Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 142, 69–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Griffen, B. D., Toscano, B. J., & Gatto, J. (2012). The role of individual behavior type in mediating indirect interactions. Ecology, 93, 1935–1943.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Hansen, E. A., & Closs, G. P. (2005). Diel activity and home range size in relation to food supply in a drift-feeding stream fish. Behavioral Ecology, 16, 640–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Herborn, K. A., Macleod, R., Miles, W. T. S., Schofield, A. N. B., Alexander, L., & Arnold, K. E. (2010). Personality in captivity reflects personality in the wild. Animal Behaviour, 79, 835–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Huntingford, F. A. (1976). The relationship between anti-predator behaviour and aggression among conspecifics in the three-spined stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Animal Behaviour, 24, 245–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Koolhaas, J. M., Korte, S. M., De Boer, S. F., Van Der Vegt, B. J., Van Reenen, C. G., Hopster, H., et al. (1999). Coping styles in animals: Current status in behavior and stress- physiology. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 23, 925–935.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Krams, I., Kivleniece, I., Kuusik, A., Krama, T., Freeberg, T. M., Mänd, R., et al. (2013). Predation selects for low resting metabolic rate and consistent individual differences in anti-predator behavior in a beetle. Acta Ethologica, 16, 163–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kuhar, C. W., Stoinski, T. S., Lukas, K. E., & Maple, T. L. (2006). Gorilla Behavior Index revisited: Age, housing and behavior. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 96, 315–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kurvers, R. H. J. M., Nolet, B. A., Prins, H. H. T., Ydenberg, R. C., & Van Oers, K. (2012). Boldness affects foraging decisions in barnacle geese: An experimental approach. Behavioral Ecology, 23, 1155–1161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kurvers, R. H. J. M., Prins, H. H. T., van Wieren, S. E., van Oers, K., Nolet, B. A., & Ydenberg, R. C. (2010). The effect of personality on social foraging: Shy barnacle geese scrounge more. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 277, 601–608.Google Scholar
  40. Lima, S. L. (1998). Stress and decision making under the risk of predation: Recent developments from behavioral, reproductive, and ecological perspectives. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 27, 215–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. MacArthur, R., & Pianka, E. (1966). On optimal use of a patchy environment. American Naturalist, 100, 603–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McArthur, C., Banks, P. B., Boonstra, R., & Forbey, J. S. (2014). The dilemma of foraging herbivores: Dealing with food and fear. Oecologia, 176, 677–689.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. McPhee, M. E., & Carlstead, K. (2010). The importance of maintaining natural behaviors in captive mammals. In D. G. Kleiman, K. V. Thompson, & C. Kirk Baer (Eds.), Wild mammals in captivity: Principles and techniques for zoo management (2nd Ed., pp. 303–313). University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  44. Mella, V. S. A., Krucler, J., Hawkins, J., Herath, A. P. H. M., Johnstone, K. C., Troxell-Smith, S. M., et al. (2016). Effective field-based methods to quantify personality in brushtail possus (Trichosurus vulpecula). Wildlife Research, 43, 332–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mella, V. S. A., Ward, A. J. W., Banks, P. B., & McArthur, C. (2015). Personality affects the foraging response of a mammalian herbivore to the dual costs of food and fear. Oecologia, 177, 293–303.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Michelena, P., Jeanson, R., Deneubourg, J.-L., & Sibbald, A. M. (2010). Personality and collective decision-making in foraging herbivores. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 277, 1093–1099.Google Scholar
  47. Michelena, P., Sibbald, A. M., Erhard, H. W., & McLeod, J. E. (2009). Effects of group size and personality on social foraging: The distribution of sheep across patches. Behavioral Ecology, 20, 145–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mogerman, J. E. E. H. (2011). Zoo foraging ecology: Patch use and giving-up densities as tools for animal care. Ph.D, dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago.Google Scholar
  49. Newberry, R. C. (1995). Environmental enrichment: Increasing the biological relevance of captive environments. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 44, 229–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Patrick, S. C., & Weimerskirch, H. (2014). Personality, foraging and fitness consequences in a long lived seabird. PLoS ONE, 9, e87269.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Potier, S., Carpentier, A., Grémillet, D., Leroy, B., & Lescroël, A. (2015). Individual repeatability of foraging behaviour in a marine predator, the great cormorant, Phalacrocorax carbo. Animal Behaviour, 103, 83–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Powell, D. M., & Gartner, M. C. (2011). Applications of personality to the management and conservation of nonhuman animals. In M. Inoue-Murayama, S. Kawamura, & A. Weiss (Eds.), From genes to animal behavior (pp. 185–199). Springer Japan.Google Scholar
  53. Powell, D. M., & Svoke, J. T. (2008). Novel environmental enrichment may provide a tool for rapid assessment of animal personality: A case study with giant pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca). Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 11, 301–318.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Rapaport, L. (1998). Optimal foraging theory predicts effects of environmental enrichment in a group of adult golden lion tamarins. Zoo Biology, 17, 231–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Raveh, A., Kotler, B. P., Abramsky, Z., & Krasnov, B. R. (2011). Driven to distraction: Detecting the hidden costs of flea parasitism through foraging behaviour in gerbils. Ecology Letters, 14, 47–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Razal, C. B., Pisacane, C. B., & Miller, L. J. (2016). Multifaceted approach to personality assessment in cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus). Animal Behavior and Cognition, 3, 22–31.Google Scholar
  57. Réale, D., & Festa-Bianchet, M. (2003). Predator-induced natural selection on temperament in bighorn ewes. Animal Behaviour, 65, 463–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Réale, D., Reader, S. M., Sol, D., McDougall, P. T., & Dingemanse, N. J. (2007). Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 82, 291–318.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Ruckstuhl, K. E., & Neuhaus, P. (2002). Sexual segregation in ungulates: A comparative test of three hypotheses. Biology Review, 77, 77–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rudin, F. S., & Briffa, M. (2012). Is boldness a resource-holding potential trait? Fighting prowess and changes in startle response in the sea anemone, Actinia equina. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 279, 1904–1910.Google Scholar
  61. Sánchez, F., Korine, C., Kotler, B. P., & Pinshow, B. (2008). Ethanol concentration in food and body condition affect foraging behavior in Egyptian fruit bats (Rousettus aegyptiacus). Naturwissenschaften, 95, 561–567.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Schaefer, S. A., & Steklis, H. D. (2014). Personality and subjective well-being in captive male western lowland gorillas living in bachelor groups. American Journal of Primatology, 76, 879–889.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Schwanz, L. E., Previtali, M. A., Gomes-Solecki, M., Brisson, D., & Ostfeld, R. S. (2012). Immunochallenge reduces risk sensitivity during foraging in white-footed mice. Animal Behaviour, 83, 155–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Shepherdson, D. J., Carlstead, K., Mellen, J. D., & Seidensticker, J. (1993). The influence of food presentation on the behavior of small cats in confined environments. Zoo Biology, 12, 203–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sih, A., Bell, A., & Johnson, J. C. (2004a). Behavioral syndromes: An ecological and evolutionary overview. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 19, 372–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sih, A., Bell, A. M., Johnson, J. C., & Ziemba, R. E. (2004b). Behavioral syndromes: An integrative overview. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 79, 241–277.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Sih, A., Cote, J., Evans, M., Fogarty, S., & Pruitt, J. (2012). Ecological implications of behavioural syndromes. Ecology Letters, 15, 278–289.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Šlipogor, V., Gunhold-de Oliveira, T., Tadić, Z., Massen, J. J. M., & Bugnyar, T. (2016). Consistent inter-individual differences in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) in boldness–shyness, stress–activity, and exploration–avoidance. American Journal of Primatology, 78, 961–973.Google Scholar
  69. Smith, B. R., & Blumstein, D. T. (2007). Fitness consequences of personality: A meta-analysis. Behavioral Ecology, 19, 448–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Stamps, J. A., & Groothuis, T. G. G. (2010). Developmental perspectives on personality: Implications for ecological and evolutionary studies of individual differences. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 365, 4029–4041.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  71. Tetley, C. L., & O’Hara, S. J. (2012). Ratings of animal personality as a tool for improving the breeding, management and welfare of zoo mammals. Animal Welfare, 21, 463–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Thornton, A. (2008). Early body condition, time budgets and the acquisition of foraging skills in meerkats. Animal Behaviour, 75, 951–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Toscano, B. J., Gownaris, N. J., Heerhartz, S. M., & Monaco, C. J. (2016). Personality, foraging behavior and specialization: Integrating behavioral and food web ecology at the individual level. Oecologia, 182, 55–69.Google Scholar
  74. Toscano, B. J., & Monaco, C. J. (2015). Testing for relationships between individual crab behavior and metabolic rate across ecological contexts. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 69, 1343–1351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Troxell-Smith, S. M., Tutka, M. J., Albergo, J. M., Balu, D., Brown, J. S., & Leonard, J. P. (2016). Foraging decisions in wild versus domestic Mus musculus: What does life in the lab select for? Behavioural Processes, 122, 43–50.Google Scholar
  76. Troxell-Smith, S. M., Watters, J. V., Whelan, C. J., & Brown, J. S. (2017). Zoo foraging ecology: Preference and welfare assessment of two okapi (Okapia johnstoni) at the Brookfield Zoo. Animal Behavior and Cognition, 4, 187–199.Google Scholar
  77. van Oortmerssen, G. A., & Bakker, T. C. M. (1981). Artificial selection for short and long attack latencies in wild Mus musculus domesticus. Behavior Genetics, 11, 115–126.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. van Overveld, T., & Matthysen, E. (2010). Personality predicts spatial responses to food manipulations in free-ranging great tits (Parus major). Biology Letters, 6, 187–190.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Watters, J. V., & Powell, D. M. (2011). Measuring animal personality for use in population management in zoos: Suggested methods and rationale. Zoo Biology, 29, 1–12.Google Scholar
  80. Webster, S. J., Dill, L. M., & Butterworth, K. (2007). The effect of sea lice infestation on the salinity preference and energetic expenditure of juvenile pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 64, 672–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Werner, T. K., & Sherry, T. W. (1987). Behavioral feeding specialization in Pinaroloxias inornata, the “Darwin’s Finch” of Cocos Island, Costa Rica. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 84, 5506–5510.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  82. Wielebnowski, N. (1999). Behavioral differences as predictors of breeding status in captive cheetahs. Zoo Biology, 18, 335–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Wilson, A. D. M., & McLaughlin, R. L. (2007). Behavioural syndromes in brook charr, Salvelinus fontinalis: Prey-search in the field corresponds with space use in novel laboratory situations. Animal Behaviour, 74, 689–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wilson, A. J., Grimmer, A., & Rosenthal, G. G. (2013). Causes and consequences of contest outcome: Aggressiveness, dominance and growth in the sheepshead swordtail, Xiphophorus birchmanni. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 67, 1151–1161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wilson, D. S. (1998). Adaptive individual differences within single populations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 353, 199–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wilson, D. S., Coleman, K., Clark, A. B., & Biederman, L. (1993). Shy-bold continuum in pumpkinseed sunfish (Lepomis gibbosus): An ecological study of a psychological trait. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 107, 250–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Woo, K. J., Elliott, K. H., Davidson, M., Gaston, A. J., & Davoren, G. K. (2008). Individual specialization in diet by a generalist marine predator reflects specialization in foraging behaviour. Journal of Animal Ecology, 77, 1082–1091.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Young, R. J. (2003). Food and foraging enrichment. In Environmental enrichment for captive animals (pp. 85–106). Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sandra M. Troxell-Smith
    • 1
  • Valentina S. A. Mella
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA
  2. 2.School of Life and Environmental SciencesThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations