Individual Differences in Nonhuman Animals: Examining Boredom, Curiosity, and Creativity

  • Malin K. Lilley
  • Stan A. Kuczaj
  • Deirdre B. Yeater
Chapter

Abstract

Personality psychology has traditionally focused on the study of individual differences in human cognition and behavior. More recently, the topic of individual differences in nonhuman animal behavior has featured more prominently in biology and psychology research. The study of individual differences in nonhuman animals has important implications for ecology, conservation, comparative psychology, agriculture, and the care of animals in zoological facilities. Individual differences in animal boredom will be examined in this chapter to highlight the importance of studying variation in boredom proneness and coping styles in nonhuman animals. The negative affective state of boredom is adaptive because it serves as motivation for an individual to re-engage with the environment, a process that can involve curiosity and creativity. Future research on animal boredom should investigate the behavioral and physiological correlates of boredom at both a species and an individual level in order to expand the existing literature and contribute to the future of animal welfare.

Keywords

Animal boredom Animal personality Animal welfare Curiosity Creativity Individual differences Environmental enrichment Play 

References

  1. Adamec, R. (1975). Behavioral and epileptic determinants of predatory attack behavior in the cat. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences, 2, 457–466.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Alligood, C., & Leighty, K. (2015). Putting the “E” in SPIDER: Evolving trends in the evaluation of environmental enrichment efficacy in zoological settings. Animal Behavior and Cognition, 2, 200–217.Google Scholar
  3. Baird, R. W. (2000). The killer whale. In H. Whitehead & J. Mann (Eds.), Cetacean societies: Field studies of dolphins and whales (pp. 127–153). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bench, S., & Lench, H. (2013). On the function of boredom. Behavioral Sciences, 3, 459–472. doi:10.3390/bs3030459 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Benson-Amran, S., & Holekamp, K. (2012). Innovative problem solving by wild spotted hyenas. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279, 4087–4095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Biondi, L. M., Bó, M. S., & Vassallo, A. I. (2010). Inter-individual and age differences in exploration, neophobia and problem-solving ability in a Neotropical raptor (Milvago chimango). Animal Cognition, 13, 701–710. doi:10.1007/s10071-010-0319-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Boesch, C. (2007). What makes us human (Homo sapiens)? The challenge of cognitive cross-species comparison. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 121, 227–240.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Boesch, C. (2008). Taking development and ecology seriously when comparing cognition: Reply to Tomasello and Call (2008). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 122, 453–455.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Buirski, P., Plutchik, R., & Kellerman, H. (1978). Sex differences, dominance, and personality in the chimpanzee. Animal Behaviour, 26, 123–129.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Burghardt, G. (2014). A brief glimpse at the long evolutionary history of play. Animal Behavior and Cognition, 1, 90–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Call, J. (2015). Conservatism versus innovation: The great ape story. In A. Kaufman & J. Kaufman (Eds.), Animal creativity and innovation (pp. 397–414). New York: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cannon, T., Heistermann, M., Hankison, S., Hockings, K., & McLennan, M. (2016). Tailored enrichment strategies and stereotypic behavior in captive individually housed macaques (Macaca spp.). Journal of Applied. Animal Welfare. doi:10.1080/10888705.2015.1126785 Google Scholar
  13. Chamove, A. S., Eysenck, H. J., & Harlow, H. F. (1972). Personality in monkeys: Factor analyses of rhesus social behavior. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 24, 496–504.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Charmoy, K., Sullivan, T., & Miller, L. J. (2015). Impact of different forms of environmental enrichment on foraging and activity levels in gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla). Animal Behavior and Cognition, 2, 233–240.Google Scholar
  15. Coleman, K., & Wilson, D. (1998). Shyness and boldness in pumpkinseed sunfish: individual differences are context-specific. Animal Behavior, 56, 927–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Collins, R. P., Litman, J. A., & Spielberger, C. D. (2004). The measurement of perceptual curiosity. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1127–1141. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00205-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cussen, V., & Mench, J. (2015). The relationship between personality dimensions and resiliency to environmental stress in orange-winged Amazon parrots (Amazona amazonica), as indicated by the development of abnormal behaviors. PLoS ONE, 10, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Daniels, L., Tze, V., & Goetz, T. (2015). Examining boredom: Different causes for different coping profiles. Learning and Individual Differences, 37, 255–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dall, S., Houston, A., & McNamara, J. (2004). The behavioural ecology of personality: Consistent individual differences from an adaptive perspective. Ecology Letters, 7, 734–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dallaire, J. A., Meagher, R. K., & Mason, G. J. (2012). Individual differences in stereotypic behaviour predict individual differences in the nature and degree of enrichment use in caged American mink. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 142, 98–108. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2012.09.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Darwin, C. (1871/1964). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  22. Darwin, C. (1872). The expressions of the emotions in man and animals. London: John Murray.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dellu, F., Mayo, W., Piazza, P. V. V., Le Moal, M., & Simon, H. (1993). Individual differences in behavioral responses to novelty in rats. Possible relationship with the sensation-seeking trait in man. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 411–418. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(93)90069-F CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Eastwood, J. D., Frischen, A., Fenske, M. J., & Smilek, D. (2012). The unengaged mind: Defining boredom in terms of attention. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 482–495. doi:10.1177/1745691612456044 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Eskelinen, H. C., Winship, K. A., & Borger-Turner, J. L. (2015). Sex, age, and individual differences in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in response to environmental enrichment. Animal Behavior and Cognition, 2, 241–253. doi:10.12966/abc.08.04.2015 Google Scholar
  27. Farmer, R., & Sundberg, N. (1986). Boredom proneness—The development and correlates of a new scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 50, 4–17. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa5001_2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Found, R., & St. Clair, C. (2016). Behavioural syndromes predict loss of migration in wild elk. Animal Behaviour, 115, 35–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fureix, C., & Meagher, R. K. (2015). What can inactivity (in its various forms) reveal about affective states in nonhuman animals? A review. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 171, 8–24. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Giraldeau, L.-A., & Dubois, F. (2008). Social foraging and the study of exploitative behavior. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 38, 59–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Goetz, T., Frenzel, A., Hall, N., Nett, U., Pekrun, R., & Lipnevich, A. (2014). Types of boredom: An experience sampling approach. Motivation and Emotion, 38, 401–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality” : The big-five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48, 26–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Gosling, S. (2001). From mice to men: What can we learn about personality from animal research? Psychological Bulletin, 127, 45–86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Gottlieb, D., Capitanio, J., & McCowan, B. (2013). Risk factors for stereotypic behavior and self-biting in Rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta): Animal’s history, current environment, and personality. American Journal of Primatology, 75, 995–1008.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Greene, W., Melillo-Sweeting, K., & Dudzinski, K. (2011). Comparing object play in captive and wild dolphins. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 24, 292–306.Google Scholar
  37. Groothuis, T. G. G., & Carere, C. (2005). Avian personalities: Characterization and epigenesis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 29, 137–150. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.06.010 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Guenther, A., Brust, V., Dersen, M., & Trillmich, F. (2013). Learning and personality types are related in cavies (Cavia aperea). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 128, 1–8.Google Scholar
  39. Herrmann, E., Hernández-Lloreda, M. V., Call, J., Hare, B., & Tomasello, M. (2010). The structure of individual differences in the cognitive abilities of children and chimpanzees. Psychological Science, 21, 102–110.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Highfill, L., & Kuczaj, S. (2010). How studies of wild and captive dolphins contribute to our understanding of individual differences and personality. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 23, 269–277.Google Scholar
  41. Hogan, L. A., Johnston, S. D., Lisle, A., Horsup, A. B., Janssen, T., & Phillips, C. J. C. (2010). Stereotypies and environmental enrichment in captive southern hairy-nosed wombats, Lasiorhinus latifrons. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 126, 85–95. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2010.05.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hogan, L. A., & Tribe, A. (2007). Prevalence and cause of stereotypic behaviour in common wombats (Vombatus ursinus) residing in Australian zoos. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 105, 180–191. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2006.06.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hopkins, W., Russel, J., & Schaeffer, J. (2014). Chimpanzee intelligence is heritable. Current Biology, 24, 1649–1652.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Hoy, J. M., Murray, P. J., & Tribe, A. (2010). Thirty years later: Enrichment practices for captive mammals. Zoo Biology, 29, 303–316. doi:10.1002/zoo.20254 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Hunter, S. A., Bay, M. S., Martin, M. L., & Hatfield, J. S. (2002). Behavioral effects of environmental enrichment on harbor seals (Phoca vitulina concolor) and gray seals (Halichoerus grypus). Zoo Biology, 21, 375–387. doi:10.1002/zoo.10042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Huntingford, F., Andrew, G., Mackenzie, S., Morera, D., Coyle, S., Pilarczyk, M., et al. (2010). Coping strategies in a strongly schooling fish, the common carp Cyprinus carpio. Journal of Fish Biology, 76, 1576–1591.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Ijichi, C., Collins, L., & Elwood, R. (2013). Evidence for the role of personality in stereotypy predisposition. Animal Behaviour, 85, 1145–1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Izzo, G. N., Bashaw, M. J., & Campbell, J. B. (2011). Enrichment and individual differences affect welfare indicators in squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 125, 347.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Joshi, S., & Pillay, N. (2016). Association between personality and stereotypic behavior in the African striped mouse Rhabdomys dilectus. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 174, 154–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kennedy, J. (1992). The new antrhopomorphism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. King, J., Weiss, A., & Sisco, M. (2008). Aping humans- age and sex effects in chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) and human (Homo sapiens) personality. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 122, 418–427.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Kuczaj, S.A. II (2017). Animal creativity and innovation. In J. Call, G. Burghardt, I. Pepperberg, C. Snowdon, & T. Zentall (Eds.), APA handbook of comparative psychology : Perception, learning, and cognition. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  53. Kuczaj, S., & Eskelinen, H. (2014a). The “creative dolphin” revisited: What do dolphins do when asked to vary their behavior? Animal Behavior and Cognition, 1, 66–77.Google Scholar
  54. Kuczaj, S. A., & Eskelinen, H. C. (2014b). Why do Dolphins Play? Animal Behavior and Cognition, 2, 113. doi:10.12966/abc.05.03.2014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kuczaj, S., Highfill, L., & Byerly, H. (2012). The importance of considering context in the assessment of personality characteristics: Evidence from ratings of dolphin personality. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 25, 309–329.Google Scholar
  56. Kuczaj, S., Lacinak, T., Garver, A., & Scarpuzzi, M. (1998). Can animals enrich their own environment? In V. Hare & K. Worley (Eds.), Proceedings of the third international conference on environmental enrichment (pp. 168–170). San Diego, CA: Shape of Enrichment Inc.Google Scholar
  57. Kuczaj, S., Makecha, R., Trone, M., Paulos, R., & Ramos, J. (2006). Role of peers in cultural innovation and cultural transmission: Evidence from the play of dolphin calves. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 19, 223–240.Google Scholar
  58. Kuczaj, S. A., II, & Walker, R. T. (2012). Dolphin problem solving. In T. Zentall & E. Wasserman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative cognition (pp. 736–756). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Laule, G., Bloomsmith, M., & Schapiro, S. (2003). The use of positive reinforcement training techniques to enhance the care, management, and welfare of primates in the laboratory. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 6, 163–173.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Lopes, M., Borger-Turner, J., Eskelinen, H., & Kuczaj, S. (2016). The influence of age, sex, and social affiliation on the responses of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) to a novel stimulus over time. Animal Behavior and Cognition, 3, 32–45.Google Scholar
  61. Mann, S., & Cadman, R. (2014). Does being bored make us more creative? Creativity Research Journal, 26, 165–173. doi:10.1080/10400419.2014.901073 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Markowitz, H., & Aday, C. (1998). Power for captive animals: Contingencies and nature. In D. J. Shepherdson, J. D. Mellen, & M. Hutchins (Eds.), Second nature: Environmental enrichment for captive animals (pp. 47–58). Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
  63. Mason, G., Clubb, R., Latham, N., & Vickery, S. (2007). Why and how should we use environmental enrichment to tackle stereotypic behaviour? Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 102, 163–188. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Meagher, R. K., & Mason, G. J. (2012). Environmental enrichment reduces signs of boredom in caged mink. PLoS ONE. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049180 Google Scholar
  65. Mellen, J., & Sevenich MacPhee, M. (2001). Philosophy of environmental enrichment: Past, present, and future. Zoo Biology, 20, 211–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Morand-Ferron, J., & Giraldeau, L. A. (2010). Learning behaviorally stable solutions to producer-scrounger games. Behavioral Ecology, 21, 343–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Owen, M., Swaisgood, R., Czekala, N., & Lindburg, D. (2005). Enclosure choice and well-being in giant pandas: Is it all about control? Zoo Biology, 24, 475–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Peterson, E., Worlein, J., Lee, G., Dettmer, A., Varner, E., & Novak, M. (2016). Rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) with self-injurious behavior show less behavioral anxiety during the human intruder test. American Journal of Primatology, 79, 1–8.Google Scholar
  69. Pervin, L., & John, O. P. (1997). Personality: Theory and research (7th ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  70. Pryor, K. (2015). Creating creative animals. In A. Kaufman & J. Kaufman (Eds.), Animal creativity and innovation (pp. 483–498). New York: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Reader, S. M. (2015). Causes of individual differences in animal exploration and search. Topics in Cognitive Science. doi:10.1111/tops.12148 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Réale, D., Reader, S. M., Sol, D., McDougall, P. T., & Dingemanse, N. J. (2007). Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution. Biological Reviews, 82, 291–318.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Renner, M. J. (1987). Experience-dependent changes in exploratory behavior in the adult rat (Rattus norvegicus): Overall activity level and interactions with objects. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 101, 94–100. doi:10.1037//0735-7036.101.1.94 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Renner, M. J., Bennett, A. J., & White, J. C. (1992). Age and sex as factors influencing spontaneous exploration and object investigation by preadult rats (Rattus norvegicus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 106, 217–227. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.106.3.217 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Ross, S. (2006). Issues of choice and control in the behaviour of a pair of captive polar bears (Ursus maritimus). Behavioural Processes, 73, 117–120.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Seligman, M. (1972). Learned helplessness. Annual Review of Medicine, 23, 407–412. doi:10.1146/annurev.me.23.020172.002203 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Sih, A., & Bell, A. (2008). Insights for behavioral ecology from behavioral syndromes. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 38, 227.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  78. Sih, A., Bell, A., Johnson, J., & Ziemba, R. (2004). Behavioral syndromes: An ecological and evolutionary overview. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 19, 372–378.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Sol, D., Griffin, A. S., & Bartomeus, I. (2012). Consumer and motor innovation in the common myna: The role of motivation and emotional responses. Animal Behaviour, 83, 179–188. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.10.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Stevenson-Hinde, J., & Zunz, M. (1978). Subjective assessment of individual rhesus monkeys. Primates, 19, 473–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Swaisgood, R., & Shepardson, D. (2006). Environmental enrichment as a stratedgy for mitigating stereotypies in zoo animals: A literature review and meta-analysis. In G. Mason & J. Rushen (Eds.), Stereotypic animal behaviour: Fundamentals and applications to welfare. Wallingford: CAB International.Google Scholar
  82. Tarou, L., & Bashaw, M. (2007). Maximizing the effectiveness of environmental enrichment: Suggestions from the experimental analysis of behavior. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 102, 189–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Tetley, C., & O’Hara, S. (2012). Ratings of animal personality as a tool for improving the breeding, management and welfare of zoo animals. Animal Welfare, 21, 463–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Thelen, E., & Farish, D. (1977). An analysis of the grooming behavior of wild and mutant strains of Bracon Hebet or (Braconidae: Hymenoptera). Behaviour, 62, 70–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Tomasello, M., & Call, J. (2007). Assessing the validity of ape-human comparisons: A reply to Boesch (2007). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 122, 449–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Veissier, I., Boissy, A., Désiré, L., & Greiveldinger, L. (2009). Animals’ emotions: Studies in sheep using appraisal theories. Animal Welfare, 18, 347–354.Google Scholar
  87. Vodanovich, S. (2003). Psychometric measures of boredom: A review of the literature. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 137, 569–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Vonk, J., & Povinelli, D. (2011). Individual differences in long-term cognitive testing in a group of chimpanzees. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 24, 137–167.Google Scholar
  89. Wechsler, B. (1992). Stereotypies and attentiveness to novel stimuli: A test in polar bears. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 33, 381–388. doi:10.1016/S0168-1591(05)80074-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Weiss, A., & King, J. (2015). Great ape origins of personality maturation and sex differences: A study of orangutans and chimpanzees. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 648–664.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Wemelsfelder, F. (1984). Animal Boredom : Is a scientific study of the subjective experiences of animals possible ? In M. W. Fox & L. D. Mickley (Eds.), Advances in animal welfare science, vol. 85 (pp. 115–154). Washington, DC: The Humane Society of the United States.Google Scholar
  92. Wemelsfelder, F., Haskell, M., Mendl, M., Calvert, S., & Lawrence, A. (2000). Diversity of behaviour during novel object tests is reduced in pigs housed in substrate-impoverished conditions. Animal Behaviour, 60, 385–394. doi:10.1006/anbe.2000.1466 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Wilson, D. (1998). Adaptive individual differences within single populations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 353, 199–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Wilson, D., Clark, A., Coleman, K., & Dearstyne, T. (1994). Shyness and boldness in humans and other animals. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 9, 442–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Wilson, D. S., Coleman, K., Clark, A. B., & Biederman, L. (1993). Shy-bold continuum in pumpkinseed sunfish (Lepomis gibbosus): An ecological study of a psychological trait. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 107, 250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Würbel, H., Bergeron, R., & Cabib, S. (2006). The coping hypothesis of stereotypic behaviour. Box 3, Chapter 1. In G. Mason & J. Rushen (Eds.), Stereotypic animal behaviour: Fundamentals and applications to welfare (pp. 14–15). Wallingford: CAB International.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Malin K. Lilley
    • 1
  • Stan A. Kuczaj
    • 1
  • Deirdre B. Yeater
    • 2
  1. 1.The University of Southern MississippiHattiesburgUSA
  2. 2.Sacred Heart UniversityFairfieldUSA

Personalised recommendations