Eco-Cycle Comprehensive Operation Performance Evaluation–A Case Study of Baotou Steel Group

  • Yuyan Luo
  • Zhong Wang
  • Yao Chen
  • Yahong Wang
  • Jiming Xie
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes on Multidisciplinary Industrial Engineering book series (LNMUINEN)

Abstract

With the advent of circular economy, enterprises have no longer given priority to the economic benefits, but also focus on social responsibility and sustainable development. In order to accelerate the ecological change of enterprise system, every enterprise vigorously carries out green technology innovation and development. Therefore, how to evaluate the performance of ecological cycle has become a problem for management personnel. This paper takes Baotou steel group as an example, which is one of the largest steel companies in China, and establishes an ecological cycle performance evaluation index system from the aspects of economic operation, resource impact control and ecological circulation innovation. Based on that, the entropy-topsis model is used to evaluate the performance of ecological cycle in Baotou steel group. Through the evaluation, we find out that the ecological cycle performance of Baotou steel rose before 2010 and still at the middle and primary stage of its eco-cycle development. The results show the evaluation index system and method can help management personnel to realize the status of their company’s eco-cycle development. It also can help policy makers to make better green policies and strategies, promoting the eco-cycle transformation in China.

Keywords

Eco-cycle Operation performance evaluation Entropy-topsis 

References

  1. 1.
    Chan FTS, Nayak A et al (2014) An innovative supply chain performance measurement system incorporating research and development (r & d) and marketing policy. Comput Ind Eng 69(1):64–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Deilmann C, Lehmann I et al (2016) Data envelopment analysis of cities-investigation of the ecological and economic efficiency of cities using a benchmarking concept from production management. Ecol Ind 67:798–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dong J (2010) Analysis of external environment of transmission project based on improved entropy topsis method. Water Resour Power 3:152–154 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gongrong C, Yanghong D (2016) Performance evaluation of eco-industrial park based on the fuzzy mathematics method. J Hunan Univ Sci Technol 19:82–89Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jung S, Dodbiba G et al (2013) A novel approach for evaluating the performance of eco-industrial park pilot projects. J Cleaner Prod 39(5):50–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Li P, Ren H, Zhao L (2005) Evaluation and analysis of enterprise eco-industrialization based on dynamic indicators. Quant Technica Econ 22(12):16–24Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mavi RK, Goh M, Mavi NK (2016) Supplier selection with shannon entropy and fuzzy topsis in the context of supply chain risk management. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 235:216–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rashidi K, Saen RF (2015) Measuring eco-efficiency based on green indicators and potentials in energy saving and undesirable output abatement. Energy Econ 50:18–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Singh S, Sidhu J (2016) Compliance-based multi-dimensional trust evaluation system for determining trustworthiness of cloud service providers. Future Gener Comput Syst 67:109–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Song X, Shen J (2015) The ecological performance of eco-industrial parks in shandong based on principal component analysis and set pair analysis. Resour Sci 37:546–554 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Swendsen RH (2016) The definition of the thermodynamic entropy in statistical mechanics. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 467:67–73MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tarantini M, Loprieno AD, Porta PL (2011) A life cycle approach to green public procurement of building materials and elements: a case study on windows. Energy 36(5):2473–2482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wu XQ, Wang Y et al (2008) Evaluation of circular economy development in industrial park based on eco-efficiency theory and topsis approach. Chin J Ecol 27(12):2203–2208Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ying Z, Hongzhi W, Guotai C (2016) Construction and application of green industry evaluation indicator system based on factor analysis. J Syst Manag 25:338–352Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yan L (2012) Assessment of circular economy in chlorine-alkali chemical industrial parks based on ahp-fce. Ind Technol Econ 31:151–155Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yuyan Luo
    • 1
  • Zhong Wang
    • 1
  • Yao Chen
    • 1
  • Yahong Wang
    • 1
  • Jiming Xie
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Management ScienceChengdu University of TechnologyChengduPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations