Skip to main content

The Empirical Evidence of the Effect on the Enterprises R&D from Government Subsidies, Political Connections and Rent-Seeking

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes on Multidisciplinary Industrial Engineering ((LNMUINEN))

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of rent-seeking behavior, political connections, and government science and technology (S&T) subsidies on the research and development (R&D) of private listed enterprises. Based on empirical data of China’s private listed enterprises between 2008 and 2012, this paper performs validation at three levels and obtains suggestive conclusions. First of all, the purpose to obtain more S&T subsidies motivates private listed enterprises to take rent-seeking activities which can facilitate them in establishing political connections (PCs). Secondly, rent-seeking activities could eventually result in crowing-out effect of the R&D input, especially for the local PCs. Thirdly, the side effect of rent-seeking is more significant for enterprises located in provinces of high corruption levels, which weakens the availability of government S&T subsidies. The improper intervention of government distorts the market resources allocation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Allen F, Qian J, Qian M (2005) Law, finance, and economic growth in china. J Financ Econ 77(1):57–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Claessens S, Feijen E, Laeven L (2008) Political connections and preferential access to finance: the role of campaign contributions. J Financ Econ 88(3):554–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dimakou O (2009) Bureaucratic corruption and the dynamic interaction between monetary and fiscal policy. Eur J Polit Econ 40:57–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Du J, Mickiewicz T (2015) Subsidies, rent seeking and performance: being young, small or private in China. J Bus Ventur 31(1):22–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Estrin S, Korosteleva J, Mickiewicz T (2013) Which institutions encourage entrepreneurial growth aspirations? J Bus Ventur 28(4):564–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Faccio M (2006) Politically connected firms. Am Econ Rev 96(1):369–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Garcła-Quevedo J (2004) Do public subsidies complement business R&D? A meta-analysis of the econometric evidence. Kyklos 57(1):87–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hessami Z (2014) Political corruption, public procurement, and budget composition: theory and evidence from OECD countries. Eur J Polit Econ 34(6):372–389

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Huang MC, Wu CC (2016) Facts or fates of investors’ losses during crises? Evidence from reit-stock volatility and tail dependence structures. Int Rev Econ Financ 42:54–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ketata I, Sofka W, Grimpe C (2015) The role of internal capabilities and firms’ environment for sustainable innovation: evidence for germany. R&D Manage 45(1):60–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kleer R (2010) Government R&D subsidies as a signal for private investors. Res Policy 39(10):1361–1374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee EY, Cin BC (2010) The effect of risk-sharing government subsidy on corporate R&D investment: empirical evidence from korea. Technol Forecast Soc Change 77(6):881–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Levin RC, Reiss PC (1984) Tests of a schumpeterian model of R&D and market structure. University of Chicago Press, pp 175–208

    Google Scholar 

  14. Marquis C, Qian C (2013) Corporate social responsibility reporting in China: symbol or substance? Organ Sci 25(1):127–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mellahi K et al (2016) A review of the nonmarket strategy literature: toward a multi-theoretical integration. J Manage 42(1):143–173

    Google Scholar 

  16. Meuleman M, Maeseneire WD (2012) Do R&D subsidies affect SMEs’ access to external financing? Soc Sci Electron Publishing 41(3):580–591

    Google Scholar 

  17. Minggui Y, Yafu H, Hongbo P (2010) Political connection, rent seeking and the effectiveness of fiscal subsidies by the local government. Econ Res J 3:65–77

    Google Scholar 

  18. Richardson S (2006) Over-investment of free cash flow. Rev Acc Stud 11(2):159–189

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Schiederig T, Tietze F, Herstatt C (2012) Green innovation in technology and innovation management-an exploratory literature review. R&D Manage 42(2):180–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Shen J, Luo C (2015) Overall review of renewable energy subsidy policies in China-contradictions of intentions and effects. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 41:1478–1488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Su ZQ, Fung HG et al (2014) Cash dividends, expropriation, and political connections: evidence from China. Int Rev Econ Financ 29(1):260–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wu A (2016) The signal effect of government R&D subsidies in China: do ownership matter? Technol Forecast Soc Change 117:339–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Xu C (2011) The fundamental institutions of China’s reforms and development. J Econ Lit 49(4):1076–1151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Xu E, Xu K (2013) A multilevel analysis of the effect of taxation incentives on innovation performance. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 60(1):137–147

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Xu K, Huang KF, Xu E (2014) Giving fish or teaching to fish? An empirical study of the effects of government research and development policies. R&D Manage 44(5):484–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yu F, Guo Y et al (2016) The impact of government subsidies and enterprises’ R&D investment: a panel data study from renewable energy in China. Energy Policy 89:106–113

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang H, Li L et al (2014) Political connections, government subsidies and firm financial performance: evidence from renewable energy manufacturing in China. Renew Energy 63(1):330–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang J, Marquis C, Qiao K (2016) Do political connections buffer firms from or bind firms to the government? A study of corporate charitable donations of Chinese firms. Organ Sci 27:1307–1324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang Y (2015) The contingent value of social resources: entrepreneurs’ use of debt-financing sources in western China. J Bus Ventur 30(3):390–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhou W (2013) Political connections and entrepreneurial investment: evidence from China’s transition economy. J Bus Ventur 28(2):299–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the project of Research Center for System Sciences and Enterprise Development (Grant No. Xq16C03).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dongliang Cai .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cai, D., Yang, Z., Jiang, W., Xu, Q. (2018). The Empirical Evidence of the Effect on the Enterprises R&D from Government Subsidies, Political Connections and Rent-Seeking. In: Xu, J., Gen, M., Hajiyev, A., Cooke, F. (eds) Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management. ICMSEM 2017. Lecture Notes on Multidisciplinary Industrial Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59280-0_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59280-0_40

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59279-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59280-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics