Advertisement

How to Predict Financing Efficiency in Public-Private Partnerships–In an Aspect of Uncertainties

  • Yixin Qiu
  • Umair AkramEmail author
  • Sihan Lin
  • Muhammad Nazam
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes on Multidisciplinary Industrial Engineering book series (LNMUINEN)

Abstract

Financing efficiency in Public-Private Partnership (PPP) projects is a vital but impressionable aspect, whose likely consequence always influenced by inevitable uncertainties and confused the stakeholders. This study aims to investigate the methods for evaluating and predicting the relative efficiency of current financing scheme in PPP project, which surrounding with various uncertainties. The current study proposed a new algorithm for assessing the inancing efficiency and simulating the flexibilities in PPP projects simultaneously. Furthermore, it integrates DEA and Monte Carlo to provide the possible probability distribution of financing efficiency which takes the uncertainties in PPP. A case study is given to show its feasibility and practicability. It shows uncertainties in PPP projects considerably count for its deviation from the optimum value. This innovative model provides an avenue to predict the effects and possible outcome of an optimal scheme, which is important for financing scheme decision making.

Keywords

PPP Monte Carlo DEA Financing efficiency 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China for financially supporting this research (Grant No.: 71502011). It is also supported by the Fundamental Funds for Humanities and Social Sciences of Beijing Jiaotong University (Grant No.: 2015jbwj013).

References

  1. 1.
    Bank AD (2013) Public-private partnership operational plan 2012-2020: realizing the vision for strategy 2020: the transformational role of public-private partnerships in Asian development bank operationsGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Broadbent J, Gill J, Laughlin R (2008) Identifying and controlling risk: the problem of uncertainty in the private finance initiative in the UK’s national health service. Crit Perspect Account 19(1):40–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dijun T, Yixiang T (2007) Volatility modeling with conditional volatility and realized volatility. In: International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management, pp 264–272Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dubi A (2000) Monte carlo applications in systems engineering. In: IEEE R&M symposium on a Dubi stochastic modeling of realistic systems topics in reliability & maintainability & statistics tutorial notesGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Franke M, John F (2011) What comes next after recession? - airline industry scenarios and potential end games. J Air Transp Manage 17(1):19–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gatti S (2013) Project finance in theory and practice: designing, structuring, and financing private and public projects. Academic Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li G, Lei Q, Yang Y (2014) The efficiency evaluation of Chinese film and television industry listed companies based on DEA method. In: 2014 Proceedings of the eighth international conference on management science and engineering management. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 83–95Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lin Q (2013) Introduction of decision analysis. Tsinghua University Press, Beijing, pp 45–47Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liu J, Yang Y (2014) Efficiency evaluation of Chinese press and publication listed companies based on DEA modelGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Martins J, Rui CM, Cruz CO (2014) Maximizing the value for money of PPP arrangements through flexibility: an application to airports. J Air Transp Manage 39:72–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Platon V, Constantinescu A (2014) Monte carlo method in risk analysis for investment projects. Procedia Econ Finance 15:393–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sastoque LM, Arboleda CA, Ponz JL (2016) A proposal for risk allocation in social infrastructure projects applying PPP in Colombia. Procedia Eng 145:1354–1361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schøyen H, Odeck J (2013) The technical efficiency of Norwegian container ports: a comparison to some Nordic and UK container ports using data envelopment analysis (DEA). Marit Econ Logist 15(2):197–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Verweij S (2015) Producing satisfactory outcomes in the implementation phase of PPP infrastructure projects: a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis of 27 road constructions in the Netherlands. Int J Project Manage 33(8):1877–1887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wang H, Huang J, Li H (2017) Local government debt risk, fiscal expenditure efficiency and economic growth. Springer, SingaporeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wanke PF, Barros CP (2015) Public-private partnerships and scale efficiency in Brazilian ports: evidence from two-stage dea analysis. Socio-Econ Plann Sci 51:13–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yu Y, Gu X, Chen Y (2017) Research on the technology transfer efficiency evaluation in industry-university-research institution collaborative innovation and its affecting factors based on the two-stage DEA model. In: 2017 Proceedings of the tenth international conference on management science and engineering management. Springer, Singapore, pp 237–249Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yüzbaşı B, Ahmed SE (2015) Shrinkage ridge regression estimators in high-dimensional linear models. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhang S, Chan APC et al (2016) Critical review on PPP research - a search from the Chinese and international journals. Int J Project Manage 34(4):597–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhongji X (1985) Monte Carlo Approach. Shanghai Science and Technology Press, ShanghaiGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhuang M (2012) Research on fiscal control in public-private partnerships of city infrastructure. In: Electronic system-integration technology conference, pp 1–4Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yixin Qiu
    • 1
  • Umair Akram
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sihan Lin
    • 1
  • Muhammad Nazam
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Economics and ManagementBeijing University of Posts and TelecommunicationsBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Institute of Business and Management ScienceUniversity of Agriculture FaisalabadFaisalabadPakistan

Personalised recommendations