Mainstreaming and Superdiversity: Beyond More Integration



The emergent literature on mainstreaming immigrant integration frequently references the term ‘superdiversity’. The diversification of migration is put forward as one rationale for implementing measures to support immigrant integration across policy fields and across levels of policy making. In this chapter and against the backdrop of the book’s empirical work, I ask how else, beyond being a rationale for mainstreaming, thinking about superdiversity might add to debates about what is mainstreamed. I primarily advance the argument that a superdiversity lens is uniquely placed to critically examine whether the goal of mainstreaming should be integration and propose to consider the merits of thinking about convivial disintegration as a more adequate policy goal.


Conventional Dissolution Mainstream Integration Superdiverse Contexts Migration-related Diversity Immigrant Side 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Alba, Richard, and Nancy Foner. 2016. Integration’s Challenges and Opportunities in the Wealthy West. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 42 (1): 3–22. doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2015.1083770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Appadurai, Arjun. 2006. Fear of Small Numbers: An Essay on the Geography of Anger, Public Planet Books. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnaut, Karel, Jan Blommaert, Ben Rampton, and Massimiliano Spotti, eds. 2016. Language and Superdiversity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Banting, Keith, and Will Kymlicka. 2013. Is There Really a Retreat from Multiculturalism Policies? New Evidence from the Multiculturalism Policy Index. Comparative European Politics 11 (5): 577–598. doi: 10.1057/cep.2013.12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Biehl, Kristen S. 2014. Spatializing Diversities, Diversifying Spaces: Housing Experiences and Home Space Perceptions in a Migrant Hub of Istanbul. Ethnic and Racial Studies 38 (4): 596–607. doi: 10.1080/01419870.2015.980293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blommaert, Jan. 2013. Ethnography, Superdiversity and Linguistic Landscapes: Chronicles of Complexity, Critical Language and Literacy Studies 18. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  7. Boccagni, Paolo. 2014. (Super)diversity and the Migration–Social Work Nexus: A New Lens on the Field of Access and Inclusion? Ethnic and Racial Studies 38 (4): 608–620. doi: 10.1080/01419870.2015.980291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bolzoni, Magda, Enrico Gargiulo, and Michele Manocchi. 2015. The Social Consequences of the Denied Access to Housing for Refugees in Urban Settings: The Case of Turin, Italy. International Journal of Housing Policy 15 (4): 400–417. doi: 10.1080/14616718.2015.1053337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boswell, Christina. 2007. Theorizing Migration Policy: Is There a Third Way? International Migration Review 41 (1): 75–100. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-7379.2007.00057.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brubaker, Rogers. 2008. Nationalist Politics and Everyday Ethnicity in a Transylvanian Town. [Pbk ed.]. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Caponio, Tiziana, Olga Jubany Baucells, and Berta Güell. 2015. Civic Integration Policies from Below: Accounting for Processes of Convergence and Divergence in Four European Cities. Ethnic and Racial Studies 39 (5): 878–895. doi: 10.1080/01419870.2015.1080379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Catney, Gemma, Nissa Finney, and Liz Twigg. 2011. Diversity and the Complexities of Ethnic Integration in the UK: Guest Editors’ Introduction. Journal of Intercultural Studies 32 (2): 107–114. doi: 10.1080/07256868.2011.547171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crul, Maurice. 2016. Super-Diversity vs. Assimilation: How Complex Diversity In Majority–Minority Cities Challenges the Assumptions of Assimilation. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 42 (1): 54–68. doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2015.1061425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Czaika, Mathias, and Hein de Haas. 2014. The Globalization of Migration: Has the World Become More Migratory? International Migration Review 48 (2): 283–323. doi: 10.1111/imre.12095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dancygier, Rafaela M., and Michael J. Donnelly. 2013. Sectoral Economies, Economic Contexts, and Attitudes Toward Immigration. The Journal of Politics 75 (1): 17–35. doi: 10.1017/S0022381612000849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gebhardt, Dirk. 2015. When the State Takes Over: Civic Integration Programmes and the Role of Cities in Immigrant Integration. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 42 (5): 742–758. doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2015.1111132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gidley, Ben. 2012. Five Principles of Integration: Policies and Inclusion. Accessed September 15, 2016.
  18. Gilroy, Paul. 2009. After Empire: Melancholia or Convivial Culture? Repr. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Hannerz, Ulf. 1992. Cultural Complexity: Studies in the Social Organization of Meaning. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Heil, Tilmann. 2015. Conviviality: (Re)negotiating Minimal Consensus. In Routledge International Handbook of Diversity Studies, Routledge International Handbooks, ed. Steven Vertovec, 317–324. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Hoehne, Jutta, and Ines Michalowski. 2016. Long-Term Effects of Language Course Timing on Language Acquisition and Social Contacts: Turkish and Moroccan Immigrants in Western Europe. International Migration Review 50 (1): 133–162. doi: 10.1111/imre.12130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hogan-Brun, Gabrielle. 2012. Language Planning in Urban Spaces. Current Issues in Language Planning 13 (3): 145–147. doi: 10.1080/14664208.2012.722378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. de Jong, Sara. 2015. Converging Logics? Managing Migration and Managing Diversity. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 42 (3): 341–358. doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2015.1074857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Les Convivialistes. 2014. Das konvivialistische Manifest: Für eine neue Kunst des Zusammenlebens. In X-Texte zu Kultur und Gesellschaft, ed. Frank Adloff and Claus Leggewie. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
  25. Magnusson, Warren. 2011. Politics of Urbanism: Seeing like a City, Interventions. London: Taylor & Francis Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Meissner, Fran. 2015. Migration in Migration-Related Diversity? The Nexus between Superdiversity and Migration Studies. Ethnic and Racial Studies 38 (4): 556–567. doi: 10.1080/01419870.2015.970209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. ———. 2016. Socialising with Diversity: Relational Diversity Through a Superdiversity Lens, Global Diversities. 1st ed. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Meissner, Fran, and Steven Vertovec. 2015. Comparing Super-Diversity. Ethnic and Racial Studies 38 (4): 541–555. doi: 10.1080/01419870.2015.980295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Padilla, Beatriz, Joana Azevedo, and Antonia Olmos-Alcaraz. 2015. Superdiversity and Conviviality: Exploring Frameworks for Doing Ethnography in Southern European Intercultural Cities. Ethnic and Racial Studies 38 (4): 621–635. doi: 10.1080/01419870.2015.980294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Phillimore, Jenny. 2013. Housing, Home and Neighbourhood Renewal in the Era of Superdiversity: Some Lessons from the West Midlands. Housing Studies 28 (5): 682–700. doi: 10.1080/02673037.2013.758242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. ———. 2015a. Delivering Maternity Services in an Era of Superdiversity: The Challenges of Novelty and Newness. Ethnic and Racial Studies 38 (4): 568–582. doi: 10.1080/01419870.2015.980288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. ———. 2015b. Embedded Integration and Organisational Change in Housing Providers in the UK. Social Policy & Society 16 (1): 1–14. doi: 10.1017/S1474746415000639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schinkel, Willem. 2013. The Imagination of ‘Society’ in Measurements of Immigrant Integration. Ethnic and Racial Studies 36 (7): 1142–1161. doi: 10.1080/01419870.2013.783709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schönwälder, Karen. 2016. Diversity and Contact: Immigration and Social Interaction in German Cities. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Silverstein, Michael. 2015. How Language Communities Intersect: Is “Superdiversity” an Incremental or Transformative Condition? Language & Communication 44: 7–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Söhn, Janina. 2013. Unequal Welcome and Unequal Life Chances: How the State Shapes Integration Opportunities of Immigrants. Archives Europeennes de Sociologie. European Journal of Sociology 54 (02): 295–326. doi: 10.1017/S0003975613000155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vertovec, Steven. 2007. Super-Diversity and Its Implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies 30 (6): 1024–1054. doi: 10.1080/01419870701599465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. ———. 2012. “Diversity” and the Social Imaginary. Archives Europeennes de Sociologie. European Journal of Sociology 53 (03): 287–312. doi: 10.1017/S000397561200015X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. ———, ed. 2015a. Diversities Old and New. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  40. ———. 2015b. Introduction: Migration, Cities, Diversities ‘Old’ and ‘New’. In Diversities Old and New, ed. Steven Vertovec, 1–22. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  41. ———. 2016. Super-Diversity as Concept and Approach: Whence It Came, Where It’s At, and Whither It’s Going. Super-Diversity: A Transatlantic Conversation, New York. Accessed April 4.
  42. Wessendorf, Susanne. 2014. Commonplace Diversity: Social Relations in a Super-Diverse Context: Social Relations in a Super-Diverse Context, Global Diversities. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  43. Wise, Amanda, and Greg Noble. 2016. Convivialities: An Orientation. Journal of Intercultural Studies 37 (5): 423–431. doi: 10.1080/07256868.2016.1213786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wise, Amanda, and Selvaraj Velayutham. 2009. Everyday Multiculturalism. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ye, Junjia. 2016a. Spatialising the Politics of Coexistence: Gui ju (规矩) in Singapore. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 41 (1): 91–103. doi: 10.1111/tran.12107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. ———. 2016b. The Ambivalence of Familiarity: Understanding Breathable Diversity Through Fleeting Encounters in Singapore’s Jurong West. Area 48 (1): 77–83. doi: 10.1111/area.12237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Urban DevelopmentUniversity of KasselKasselGermany
  2. 2.Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment OTBDelft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations