Abstract
The authors explore the intellectual and pedagogical implications of big data visualizations. Representing data visually implies simplifying and essentializing information. However, the selective nature of information visualization can lend itself to lies, manipulations, and misleading information. To avoid these pitfalls, data analysts should focus and embrace specific principles and practices that aim to represent complete, contextualized, comparable, and scalable information in a way that reveals rather than isolates the viewer and the problem at hand from the problem space it reflects.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
References
Berger, J. (1972). Ways of seeing. London: Penguin.
Bivens, R. (2015). The gender binary will not be deprogrammed: Ten years of coding gender on Facebook. New Media & Society, 1461444815621527. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1461444815621527.
Bowker, G. C. (2006). Memory practices in the sciences. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
D’Ignazio, C. (2015). What would feminist data visualization look like? Retrieved June 16, 2016, from https://civic.mit.edu/feminist-data-visualization.
D’Ignazio, C. (2016). A primer on non-binary gender and big data. Retrieved June 16, 2016, from https://civic.mit.edu/blog/kanarinka/a-primer-on-non-binary-gender-and-big-data
Easterling, K. (2014). Extrastatecraft: The Power of Infrastructure Space. Verso.
Galloway, A. (2011). Are some things unrepresentable? Theory, Culture & Society, 28(7–8), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276411423038.
Gillespie, T. (2016). Facebook trending: It’s made of people!! (but we should have already known that). Retrieved from http://culturedigitally.org/2016/05/facebook-trending-its-made-of-people-but-we-should-have-already-known-that/.
Gitelman, L. (2013). Raw data is an oxymoron. Retrieved June 16, 2016, from https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/raw-data-oxymoron.
Harding, S. (1996). Feminism, science and the anti-enlightenment critiques. In A. Garry & M. Pearsall (Eds.), Women, knowledge, and reality: Explorations in feminist philosophy (2nd ed., pp. 298–320). Boston: Unwin Hyman.
Irani, L. (2015). Difference and dependence among digital workers: The case of Amazon mechanical Turk. South Atlantic Quarterly, 114(1), 225–234. https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-2831665.
Keim, D., Qu, H., & Ma, K. L. (2013). Big-data visualization. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 33(4), 20–21. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2013.54.
Kitchin, R. (2014). The data revolution: Big data, open data, data infrastructures and their consequences. Thousand OAks: SAGE Publications.
MacEachren, A. M. (1995). How maps work: Representation, visualization, and design. Guilford Press.
Manovich, L. (2012). Trending: The promises and the challenges of big social data. In M. K. Gold (Ed.), Debates in the digital humanities (pp. 460–475). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Munster, A. (2009). Data undermining: The work of networked art in an age of imperceptibility. Retrieved from http://turbulence.org/project/data-undermining/#.
Roberts, S. (2016). Digital refuse: Canadian garbage, commercial content moderation and the global circulation of social media’s waste. Wi: Journal of Mobile Media. Retrieved from http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/commpub/14.
Seaver, N. (2013). Knowing algorithms. Presented at the Media in Transition 8, Cambridge, MA. Retrieved from http://nickseaver.net/s/seaverMiT8.pdf.
Stalbaum, B. (2004). An interpretive framework for contemporary database practice in the arts. Presented at the College Art Association 94th annual conference, Boston, MA. Retrieved from http://paintersflat.net/database_interpret.html.
Starfield, B., Shi, L., & Macinko, J. (2005). Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. Milbank Quarterly, 83(3), 457–502. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00409.x.
Tufte, E. R. (1997). Visual explanations: Images and quantities, evidence and narrative. Cheshire: Graphics Press.
Yau, N. (2011). Visualize this: The flowing data guide to design, visualization, and statistics. Chichester: Wiley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mahmud, A., Hogan, M., Zeffiro, A., Hemphill, L. (2017). Teaching Students How (Not) to Lie, Manipulate, and Mislead with Information Visualization. In: Matei, S., Jullien, N., Goggins, S. (eds) Big Data Factories. Computational Social Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59186-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59186-5_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59185-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59186-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)