Accessibility and Flexibility: Two Organizing Principles for Big Data Collaboration
The chapter argues that accessibility and flexibility are the two principles and practices that can bring big data projects the closest to a data factory ideal. The chapter elaborates on the necessity of these two principles, offering a reasoned explanation for their value in context. Using two big data social scientific research projects as a springboard for conversation the chapter highlights both the advantages and the practical limits within which accessibility and flexibility operate. The authors avoid both utopian and dystopian tropes about big data approaches. In addition, they offer a critical feminist discussion of big data collaboration. Of particular interest are also the manner in which specific characteristics of big data projects, especially volume and velocity, may affect multidisciplinary collaborations.
KeywordsData management Data access Data collection Feminism Big data
- accessible, adj. (n.d.). OED online. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/1034.
- Aggarwal, C. C., & Yu, P. S. (2008a). A general survey of privacy-preserving data mining models and algorithms. In C. C. Aggarwal & P. S. Yu (Eds.), Privacy-preserving data mining (pp. 11–52). New York: Springer. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-0-387-70992-5_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Aggarwal, C. C., & Yu, P. S. (Eds.). (2008b). Privacy-preserving data mining: Models and algorithms. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Anderson, D. J. (2003). Agile management for software engineering: Applying the theory of constraints for business results. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall Professional.Google Scholar
- Anderson, C. (2008). The end of theory: The data deluge makes the scientific method obsolete. Retrieved June 13, 2016, from http://www.wired.com/2008/06/pb-theory/.
- Andrejevic, M. (2014). Big data, big questions| the big data divide. International Journal of Communication, 8(0), 17.Google Scholar
- Bird, S. (2012). Feminist methods of research. Iowa State University. Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/miryammastrella/presentation-on-feminist-methods-of-research.
- Boyd, D. (2014). It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Coleman, G., & Rippin, A. (2000). Putting feminist theory to work: Collaboration as a means towards organizational change. Organization, 7(4), 573–587. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 135050840074004.
- Crawford, K., Gray, M., & Miltner, K. (Eds.). (2014). Big data|critiquing big data: Politics, ethics, epistemology. International Journal of Communication, 8, 1663–1672.Google Scholar
- Cukier, K. N., & Mayer-Schoenberger, V. (2013). The rise of big data: How it’s changing the way we think about the world. Foreign Affairs. Retrieved from https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2013-04-03/rise-big-data.
- Cummings, J. N., & Kiesler, S. (2003). KDI initiative: Multidisciplinary scientific collaborations. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation. Retrieved from http://netvis.fuqua.duke.edu/papers/NSF_KDI_report.pdf.Google Scholar
- Dreyfus, H. L. (1991). Being-in-the-world: A commentary on Heidegger’s being and time, division I. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New Brunswick: Aldine.Google Scholar
- Heidegger, M., & Stambaugh, J. (1996). Being and time: A translation of Sein und Zeit. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
- Hemphill, L., Roback, A. J. (2014). Tweet acts: How constituents lobby congress via twitter. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (pp. 1200–1210). New York: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531735.
- Hemphill, L., Otterbacher, J., Shapiro, M. (2013). What’s congress doing on twitter? In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 877–886). New York: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2441776.2441876.
- Hemphill, L., Erickson, I., Ribes, D., Mergel, I. (2014). Feminism and social media research. In Proceedings of the Companion Publication of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (pp. 319–322). New York: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556420.2558864.
- Hogan, B. (2010). The presentation of self in the age of social media: Distinguishing performances and exhibitions online. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 0270467610385893. 30 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467610385893.
- Iwarsson, S., & Stahl, A. (2003). Accessibility, usability and universal design – positioning and definition of concepts describing person-environment relationships. Disability and Rehabilitation, 25(2), 57.Google Scholar
- Jackson, P. T. (2010). The conduct of inquiry in international relations: Philosophy of science and its implications for the study of world politics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Jackson, S. T. (2016). Marketing militarism in the digital age: Arms production, YouTube, and selling “national security.” In Hamilton & Shepherd, Understanding popular culture and world politics in the digital age. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Kitchin, R. (2014). Big data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big Data & Society, 1(1), 2053951714528481. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714528481.
- Making data – Big data and beyond. (2013). First Monday, 18(10).Google Scholar
- Markham, A. (2016). OKCupid data release fiasco: It’s time to rethink ethics education. Retrieved May 18, 2016, from https://medium.com/@amarkham/okcupid-data-release-fiasco-ba0388348cd#.3irk2qca8.
- McCarthy, D. R. (2013). Technology and “the International” or: How I learned to stop worrying and love determinism. Millennium – Journal of International Studies, 0305829813484636. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829813484636.
- Metcalf, J., & Crawford, K. (2016). Where are human subjects in big data research? The emerging ethics divide. Big Data & Society. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2779647.
- Morien, R. (2005). Agile management and the Toyota way for software project management. In Industrial informatics, 2005. INDIN’05. 2005 3rd IEEE International Conference on (pp. 516–522). IEEE. Retrieved from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=1560430.
- Mountz, A., Bonds, A., Mansfield, B., Loyd, J., Hyndman, J., Walton-Roberts, M., … Curran, W. (2015). For slow scholarship: A feminist politics of resistance through collective action in the neoliberal university. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 14(4), 1235–1259.Google Scholar
- Ribes, D., & Jackson, S. L. (2013). Data bite man: The work of sustaining a long-term study. In L. Gitelman (Ed.), “Raw data” is an oxymoron (pp. 147–166). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Sarantakos, S. (2012). Social research (4th ed.). South Melbourne: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Shapiro, M. A., & Hemphill, L. (in press). Agenda building & indexing: Does the U.S. congress direct New York Times content through Twitter? Policy & Internet.Google Scholar
- Siegel, E. (2013). Predictive analytics: The power to predict who will click, buy, lie, or die. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Zimmer, M. (2016). OkCupid study reveals the perils of big-data science. Retrieved May 18, 2016, from https://www.wired.com/2016/05/okcupid-study-reveals-perils-big-data-science/.
- Zwitter, A. (2014). Big data ethics. Big Data & Society, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/ 2053951714559253.