Skip to main content

Extending CCM4DSR for Collaborative Diagnosis of Socio-Technical Problems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Designing the Digital Transformation (DESRIST 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10243))

Abstract

The identification of a problem, its causes and its consequences are integral parts of designing useful solutions in Design Science Research (DSR). Many problems addressed in DSR are of a socio-technical nature, and they are collaboratively solved in multidisciplinary teams. Accordingly, analysis techniques are needed which integrate diverse perspectives of problem analysis. Colored Cognitive Mapping for DSR (CCM4DSR) is such a technique. By applying CCM4DSR to an exemplary socio-technical problem, this paper reports on observed challenges and offers four extensions to CCM4DSR. These extensions provide guidance in adequately stating the problem, considering path dependencies, explicating different stakeholder perspectives, and integrating different perspectives through a comprehensive process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The introduction to CCM4DSR was an essential part of a DSR course hold by John Venable at the University of St.Gallen, Switzerland, between September and October 2016. The corresponding PowerPoint slides are not published but shared on request (j.venable@curtin.edu.au).

References

  1. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Q. 28, 75–105 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Winter, R.: Problem analysis for situational artefact construction in information systems. In: Carugati, A., Rossignoli, C. (eds.) Emerging Themes in Information Systems and Organization Studies, pp. 97–113. Physica, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Montazemi, A.R., Conrath, D.W.: The use of cognitive mapping for information requirements analysis. MIS Q. 10, 45–56 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cronholm, S., Göbel, H., Lind, M., Rudmark, D.: The need for systems development capability in design science research: enabling researcher-systems developer collaboration. Inf. Syst. e-Bus. Manag. 11, 335–355 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Venable, J.R.: Using Coloured Cognitive Mapping (CCM) for design science research. In: Tremblay, M.C., VanderMeer, D., Rothenberger, M., Gupta, A., Yoon, V. (eds.) DESRIST 2014. LNCS, vol. 8463, pp. 345–359. Springer, Cham (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-06701-8_25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Fiol, C.M., Huff, A.S.: Maps For managers: where are we? Where do we go from here? J. Manag. Stud. 29, 267–285 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Venable, J.R.: Coloured cognitive maps for modelling decision contexts. In: Bui, T., Gachet, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Context Modeling and Decision Support, Paris, France, pp. 1613–0073 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Venable, J.R.: Supporting problem formulation in is development with coloured cognitive maps. In: Proceedings of AIS SIGSAND European Symposium on Systems Analysis and Design: Practice and Research, Galway, Ireland, p. 105 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Haj-Bolouri, A., Svensson, L.: Designing for heterogeneous groups of end-users: towards a nascent design theory. In: Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, pp. 765–776 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pries-Heje, J., Baskerville, R.L.: The design theory nexus. MIS Q. 32, 731–755 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gregor, S.: The Nature of Theory in Information Systems. MIS Q. 30, 611–642 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M., Chatterjee, S.: A design science research methodology for information systems research. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 24, 45–77 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mettler, T., Eurich, M., Winter, R.: On the use of experiments in design science research: a proposition of an evaluation framework. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 34, 223–240 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fischer, C., Gregor, S., Aier, S.: Forms of discovery for design knowledge. In: The 20th European Conference on Information Systems, Barcelona (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Conboy, K., Gleasure, R., Cullina, E.: Agile design science research. In: Donnellan, B., Helfert, M., Kenneally, J., VanderMeer, D., Rothenberger, M., Winter, R. (eds.) DESRIST 2015. LNCS, vol. 9073, pp. 168–180. Springer, Cham (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-18714-3_11

    Google Scholar 

  16. Baskerville, R.L., Pries-Heje, J., Venable, J.R.: Soft design science methodology. In: Fourth International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (DESRIST 2009), pp. 1–11. ACM, Philadelphia (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tolman, E.C.U.: Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychol. Rev. 55, 189–208 (1948)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Neisser, U.: Introduction: The ecological and intellectual bases of categorization. In: Neisser, U. (ed.) Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization, pp. 1–11. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lakoff, G.: Cognitive models and prototype theory. In: Margolis, E., Laurence, S. (eds.) Concepts: Core Readings. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Swan, J.: Using cognitive mapping in management research: decisions about technical innovation. Br. J. Manag. 8, 183–198 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Siau, K., Tan, X.: Use of cognitive mapping techniques in information systems development. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 48, 49–57 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Huff, A.S.: Mapping Strategic Thought. Wiley, Chichester (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Langfield-Smith, K.: Exploring the need for a shared cognitive map. J. Manag. Stud. 29, 349–368 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hart, J.A.: Cognitive maps of three Latin American policy makers. World Polit. 30, 115–140 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Axelrod, R.: Structure of decision: The cognitive maps of political elites. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Eden, C., Jones, S.: Publish or perish? - a case study. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 31, 131–139 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Klein, J.H., Cooper, D.F.: Cognitive maps of decision-makers in a complex game. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 33, 63–71 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bougon, M.G.: Congregate cognitive maps: a unified dynamic theory of organization and strategy. J. Manag. Stud. 29, 369–387 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Gengler, C.E., Rossi, M., Hui, W., Virtanen, V., Bragge, J.: The design science research process: a model for producing and presenting information systems research. In: Chatterjee, S., Hevner, A.R. (eds.) 1st International Conference on Design Science in Information Systems and Technology, Claremont, CA, pp. 83–106 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Boh, W.F., Yellin, D.: Using enterprise architecture standards in managing information technology. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 23, 163–207 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Baer, M., Dirks, K.T., Nickerson, J.A.: Microfoundations of strategic problem formulation microfoundations of strategic problem formulation. Strateg. Manag. J. 34, 197–214 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Gregor, S., Jones, D.: The anatomy of a design theory. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 8, 312–335 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sydow, J., Schreyögg, G., Koch, J.: Organizational path dependence: opening the black box. Acad. Manag. Rev. 34, 689–709 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Winter, R.: Design solution analysis for the construction of situational design methods. In: Ralyté, J., Mirbel, I., Deneckère, R. (eds.) ME 2011. IAICT, vol. 351, pp. 19–33. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-19997-4_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  35. Tegarden, D.P., Sheetz, S.D.: Group cognitive mapping: a methodology and system for capturing and evaluating managerial and organizational cognition. Omega 31, 113–125 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Eden, C., Ackermann, F.: Making Strategy: The Journey of Strategic Management. Sage Publications, London (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Aier, S., Fischer, C.: Criteria of progress for information systems design theories. Inf. Syst. E-Bus. Manag. 9, 133–172 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raphael D. Schilling .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Schilling, R.D., Aier, S., Brosius, M., Kazem Haki, M., Winter, R. (2017). Extending CCM4DSR for Collaborative Diagnosis of Socio-Technical Problems. In: Maedche, A., vom Brocke, J., Hevner, A. (eds) Designing the Digital Transformation. DESRIST 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10243. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59144-5_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59144-5_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59143-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59144-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics