Advertisement

Economic Policies to Reduce the Abuse of Illicit Drugs

  • John JoshuaEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter discusses the economics of the abuse of illicit drugs, including an analysis of the model of rational addiction. An analysis of the illicit drug market has to consider the effect of addiction on the use of illicit drugs, so that addiction, rational decisions, and utility maximization are discussed in detail. This chapter explains the concept of price elasticities and their effects on drug policies. Increases in prices of illicit drugs may deter potential drug users to enter the drug market, but there is a dispute how this may affect the abuse of drugs by addicts. Hence, the relationship between addiction and rational decision is explored. Addiction increases tolerance of the drug, and therefore, the level of consumption increases as the marginal utility declines.

Keywords

Addiction Drug market Economics of drug abuse Model of rational addiction Price elasticities Rational decision Utility maximization 

References

  1. Ainslie, G. (1992). Picoeconomics. The strategic interaction of successive motivational states within the person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Becker, G. S., & Murphy, K. M. (1988). A theory of rational addiction. Journal of Political Economy, 98(4), 675–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker, G., Grossman, M., & Murphy, K. M. (1991). Rational addiction and the effect of price consumption. American Economic Review, Paper and Proceedings, 81(2), 237–241.Google Scholar
  4. Becker, G. S., Grossman, M., & Murphy, K. M. (1994). An empirical analysis of cigarette addiction. American Economic Review, 84(3), 396–418.Google Scholar
  5. Block, W. (1993). Drug prohibition: A legal and economic analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 12, 689–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buck, D., Godfrey, C., & Sutton, M. (1996). Economic and other views of addiction: Implications for the choice of alcohol, tobacco and drugs policies. Drug and Alcohol Review, 15, 357–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burks, S. V., Carpenter, J. P., Götte, L., & Rustichini, A. (2008). Cognitive skills explain economic preferences, strategic behaviour, and job attachment. IZA Discussion Paper No. 3609.Google Scholar
  8. De Palma, A., Myers, G. M., & Papageorgiou, Y. (1994). Rational choice under an imperfect ability of choose. American Economic Review, 84(3), 419–440.Google Scholar
  9. Galbraith, J. K. (1967). The new industrial state. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  10. Grossman, M., Chaloupka, F. J., & Anderson, R. (1998). A survey of economic models of addictive behavior. Journal of Drug Issues, 28(3), 631–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Leibenstein, H. (1976). Beyond economic man: A new foundation for microeconomics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. MacDonald, Z. (2004). What price drug use? The contribution of economics to an evidence-based drugs policy. Journal of Economic Survey, 18(2), 113–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Miron, J. A., & Zwiebel, J. (1991). Alcohol consumption during the Prohibition. American Economic Review, Paper and Proceedings, 81(2), 242–247.Google Scholar
  14. Monterosso, J., & Ainslie, G. (2009). The picoeconomic approach to addictions: Analyzing the conflict of successive motivational states. Addiction Research & Theory, 17(2), 115–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  16. Orphanidis, A., & Zervos, D. (1995). Rational addiction with learning and regret. Journal of Political Economy, 103(4), 739–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Orphanidis, A., & Zervos, D. (1998). Myopia and addictive behaviour. The Economic Journal, 108(446), 75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Saffer, H., & Chaloupka, F. (1995). The demand for illicit drugs. Natural Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper No. 5238, Cambridge, MA, August, 1995.Google Scholar
  19. Samuelson, P. (1947). Foundations of economic analysis. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99–118.Google Scholar
  21. Stigler, G. J., & Becker, G. S. (1977). De gustibus non est disputandum. American Economic Review, 67(2), 76–90.Google Scholar
  22. Unick, G., Rosenblum, D., et al. (2014). The relationship between US heroin market dynamics and heroin-related overdose, 1992–2008. Addiction, 109, 1889–1898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Van Ours, J. C. (1995). The price elasticity of hard drugs: The case of opium in the Dutch East Indies, 1923–1938. Journal of Political Economy, 103(2), 261–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Deakin UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations