Participatory Technologies: Affordances for Development

  • Tony RobertsEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 504)


This work-in-progress paper presents a line of research analysing the affordances of a range of participatory technologies for development. Affordances are the ‘actionable possibilities’ that are made possible (but not determined) by a technology. Participatory technologies are a range of technology-mediated practices used in participatory development initiatives, such as participatory video and participatory digital mapping. This research examines the relationship between technological artefacts, participatory processes and development outcomes and asks to what extent one contributes to another. As this is work-in-progress it is too early to draw firm conclusions however this paper identifies the need to distinguish between a participatory technology’s technical features, its functional affordances and the affordances of participatory video practices. Affordances seem to provide a potential conceptual means to bridge the relatively technocentric and realist approaches of some IS, HCI and ICT4D with the relatively anthrocentric and constructivist approaches of some STS and development studies.


Affordances Participation Development HCI IS Informatics ICT4D 


  1. 1.
    Unwin, T.: ICT4D: Information and Communications for Development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chambers, R.: To Know Better: Reflection for Development. Practical Action Press, Rugby (2017, forthcoming)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Orlikowski, W., Icono, C.: Desperately seeking the IT in IT research: a call to theorize the IT artifact. Inf. Syst. Res. 12(2), 121–134 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Walsham, G., Sahay, S.: Research on information systems in developing countries: current landscapes and future prospects. Inf. Technol. Dev. 12(1), 7–24 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Walsham, G.: Development informatics in a changing world: reflections from ICTD 2010/2012. Inf. Technol. Int. Dev. 9(1), 49–54 (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Avgerou, C.: Discourses on ICT and development. Inf. Technol. Int. Dev. 6(3), 1–18 (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Baskar, R.: A Realist Theory of Science. Verso, London (1975, 1997)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mackenzie, D., Wajcman, J. (eds.): The Social Shaping of Technology. Open University Press, Milton Keynes (1987)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pinch, T., Bijker, W.: The social construction of facts and artefacts. Soc. Stud. Sci. 14(3), 388–441 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Latour, B.: Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor Network Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Freire, P.: Education the Practice of Freedom. Writers and Readers, London (1973)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sen, A.: Development as Freedom, p. 11. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1999)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Esteva, G.: Development. In: Sachs, W. (ed.) The Development Dictionary. Zed Books, London (1992)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gibson, J.: The theory of affordances in perceiving, acting, and knowing. In: Shaw, R., Bransford, J. (eds.). OUP, London (1977)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Costall, A.: Socialising affordances. Theory Psychol. 5(4), 467–481 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lunch, N., Lunch, C.: Insights into Participatory Video, Insightshare (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shaw, J., Robertson, C.: Participatory Video: A Practical Guide to Using Video Creatively in Group Development Work. Routledge, London (1997)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nyerere, J.: Freedom and Development, p. 7. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1973)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fals-Borda, O.: Investigating reality in order to transform it: the colombian experience. Dialect. Anthropol. 4, 33–35 (1979). AmsterdamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tandon, R.: Participatory research and the empowerment of people. Convergence Int. J. Adult Educ. 14(3), 20–24 (1981)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Swantz, M.L.: Research as education for development, a Tanzanian case. In: Hall, B. (ed.) Creating Knowledge: A Monopoly? Participatory Research in Development, New Delhi, SPRIA (1982)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Freire, P.: Pedagogy of Hope. Continuum, New York (1998)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tandon, R.: Participation, citizenship and democracy: reflections on 25 years of PRIA. Community Dev. J. 43(3), 284–296 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chambers, R.: Whose Reality Counts? Putting the First Last. Practical Action Publishing, Rugby (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cooke, B., Kothari, U. (eds.): Participation: The New Tyranny. Zed Books, London (2001)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hickey, S., Mohan, G.: Participation: From Tyranny to Transformation? Zed Books, London (2004)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kelley, U.: Confrontation with power: moving beyond the tyranny of safety in participation. In: Hickey, S., Mohan, G. (eds.) Participation: From Tyranny to Transformation (2004)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Waddington, M., Mohan, G.: Falling forward: going beyond PRA and imposed forms of participation. In: Hickey, S., Mohan, G. (eds.) Participation: From Tyranny to Transformation. Zed Books, London (2004)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Arnstein, S.R.: A ladder of citizen participation. J. Am. Inst. Planners 35(4), 216–224 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    White, S.: Depoliticising development: the uses and abuses of participation. Dev. Pract. 6(1), 6–15 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Snowden, D.: Eyes See, Ears Hear: supplement to a film under the same title, St. John’s Memorial University of Newfoundland (1984)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Guijt, I., Gaventa, J.: Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation: Learning From Change. IDS Policy Briefing Issue 12, Brighton: IDS (1998)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    MacEntee, K., Burkholder, C., Schwab-Cartas, J. (eds.): What is Cellfilm: Integrating Mobile Phone Technology into Participatory Visual Research and Activism. Sense, Rotterdam (2016)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tushev, N.: Documenting illegal land occupancy using drones (2016). Accessed 23 Feb 2017
  35. 35.
    Prensky, M.: Digital natives digital immigrants. Horizon 9(5), 1–6 (2001). MCB University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Norman, D.: The Design of Everyday Things. Basic Books, New York (1988)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lidwell, W., Holden, K., Butler, J.: Universal Principles of Design. Massachusetts, Rockport (2003)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hutchby, I.: Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology 35, 444 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zheng, Y., Yu, A.: Affordances of social media in collective action: the case of free lunch for children in China. Inf. Syst. J. 26(3), 289–313 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Fayard, A., Weeks, J.: Affordances for practice. Inf. Organ. 24, 236–249 (2014). doi: 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2014.10.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Roberts, T.: Women’s use of participatory video technology to tackle gender inequality in Zambia’s ICT sector. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology and Development, 4–6 June 2016, Ann Arbor, USA (2016)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Roberts, T.: Critical Agency in ICT4D, Unpublished Ph.D., Royal Holloway, University of London (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© © IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Development StudiesUniversity of SussexBrightonUK

Personalised recommendations