Unmasking the Face of Gendered Citizenship: Anupama Chandrasekhar’s Acid and Free Outgoing

Part of the Contemporary Performance InterActions book series (CPI)


Women’s citizenship at risk in a violent patriarchal culture is the focus of this essay. The gravity of the ‘at risk’ situation for Indian women makes a compelling argument for cultural resources that might complement the work of activist groups, organisations or networks lobbying for an end to violence against women—resources that help to understand, reveal and critique India’s masculinist hegemony. Hence my case studies of two feminist plays by the Chennai-based Indian playwright Anupama Chandrasekhar: Acid (2004) and Free Outgoing (2007). Acid tackles the violent crime of acid attacks against women; Free Outgoing treats the issue of young women’s sexuality as policed by traditional values and abused by the power of social media. Analysing these plays, I follow Phadke et al. (Why Loiter?: Women & Risk on Mumbai Streets. Penguin Books India, New Delhi, 2011) in advocating the ‘right to risk’ as fundamental to women’s agency. This postulation argues for women’s liberation from the sexual double standard that polices their lives in both private and public spheres, and curtails their freedom or risk-taking behaviours. Furthermore, I argue that to insist on the ‘right to risk’ is to resist increased patriarchal surveillance or protectionism as the solution to women’s relative lack of safety.


  1. Allfree, Claire. 2007. Review of Free Outgoing, Metro (London). 14 November. Reprinted in Theatre Record XXVII (23): 1367.Google Scholar
  2. Aston, Elaine, and Mark O’Thomas. 2015. Royal Court Theatre: International. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  3. Billington, Michael. 2007. Review of Free Outgoing. Guardian. 13 November. Reprinted in Theatre Record XXVII (23): 1366.Google Scholar
  4. Canning, Glen. 2014. Nightwood Theatre Tackles Cyberbullying Accessed 13 Aug 2016.
  5. Chandrasekhar, Anupama. (unpublished) Acid.Google Scholar
  6. ——. 2007. Free Outgoing. London: Nick Hern Books.Google Scholar
  7. ——. 2014. The Threats to Political Theatre in India: Fundamentalism and Escapism. 10 April. Accessed 13 Aug 2016.
  8. ——. 2015. Conversation with Elaine Aston. In Aston and O’Thomas, Royal Court: International. pp. 101–108.Google Scholar
  9. Chowdhury, Elora Halim. 2005. Feminist Negotiations: Contesting Narratives of the Campaign against Acid Violence in Bangladesh. Meridians 6 (1): 163–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dasgupta, KumKum. 2014. Acid Attack Survivors in India Find Safe Space but Little Respite. Guardian. 9 September. Accessed 13 Aug 2016.
  11. De Angelis, April. 2012. Royal Court’s New Plays from India: Snapshots of the Subcontinent. Guardian. 9 November. Accessed 13 Aug 2016.
  12. Desai, Purva (n.d.) Review of Acid, Mumbai Theatre Accessed 13 Aug 2016.
  13. Dutt, Bishnupriya. 2012. The Unsafe Spaces of Theatre and Feminism in India. Theatre Research International 37 (1): 77–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hower, Edward. 2011. Blame Game Again. Hindu. 24 March. Accessed 13 Aug 2016.
  15. Kapur, Ratna. 2012. Pink Chaddis and SlutWalk Couture: The Postcolonial Politics of Feminism Lite. Feminist Legal Studies 20: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lakshmi, Rama. 2013. India is Taking Acid Attacks More Seriously. Guardian. 27 August Accessed 13 Aug 2016.
  17. Letts, Quentin. 2007. Review of Free Outgoing. Daily Mail. 13 November. Reprinted in Theatre Record XXVII (23): 1366.Google Scholar
  18. McGinn, Caroline. 2007. Review of Free Outgoing. Time Out London. 21 November. Reprinted in Theatre Record XXVII (23): 1367.Google Scholar
  19. Phadke, Shilpa, Sameera Khan, and Shilpa Ranade. 2011. Why Loiter?: Women & Risk on Mumbai Streets. New Delhi: Penguin Books India.Google Scholar
  20. Ramnarayan, Gowri. 2008. Plumbing the Silences. Hindu. 26 April. Accessed 13 Aug 2016.
  21. Sahani, Alaka. 2015. Viral Fever. Indian Express. 10 February, Accessed 13 Aug 2016.
  22. Spencer, Charles. 2007. Review of Free Outgoing. Daily Telegraph. 14 November. Reprinted in Theatre Record XXVII (23): 1366–1367.Google Scholar
  23. Sunder, Madhavi. 1996. In a “Fragile Space”: Sexual Harassment and Indian Feminism. Law & Policy 18 (3&4): 419–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tiwari, Pragya. 2012. Introduction Rage Productions. Sight Lines: Three Contemporary Indian Plays. ix–xxv. Gurgaon, India: Hachette.Google Scholar
  25. Tribune. 2004. Chandigarh, India. School Student Involved in MMS Porn Case. 20 December. Accessed 13 Aug 2016.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lancaster UniversityLancasterUK

Personalised recommendations