Advertisement

The Equivalence of Hypotheses and Dynamical Causation

  • Tzuchien Tho
Chapter
Part of the Studies in History and Philosophy of Science book series (AUST, volume 46)

Abstract

The third chapter of this book begins a three-part presentation of the central architectonic components of the dynamics (continued in the following chapters). In this chapter, we examine the so-called equivalence of hypothesis, inherited from Kepler, Galileo and Huygens, and see how it shaped the concept of force and the method of its measurement. The main aim is to show the theoretical independence of the equivalence of hypotheses and the theory of Leibnzian vis in order to understand how the former principle provides the limits of physical phenomena. It is within these limits that Leibniz vis can be understood as cause.

Bibliography

2. Other Texts of G.W. Leibniz (Not Cited by Abbreviation)

  1. Leibniz, G.W. 1991. Phoranomus seu de potentia et legibus naturae. Ed. and annotation by André Robinet. Physis 28(2): 429–541 and Physis 28(3): 797–885.Google Scholar

II. Texts by Other Authors

  1. Arthur, Richard T.W. 1994. Space and Relativity in Newton and Leibniz. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45: 219–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernstein, Howard. 1981. Passivity and Inertia in Leibniz’s “Dynamics”. Studia Leibnitiana 13: 97–113.Google Scholar
  3. Bernstein, Howard. 1984. Leibniz and Huygens on the “Relativity” of Motion. Studia Leibnitiana Sonderhelft 13: 85–102.Google Scholar
  4. Bertoloni Meli, Domenico. 1990. The Relativization of Centrifugal Force. Isis 81 (1): 23–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Duchesneau, François. 1994. La Dynamique de Leibniz. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  6. Earman, John S. 1989. World Enough and Space-Time: Absolute versus Relational Theories of Space and Time. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Fichant, Michel. 1995. De la puissance à l’action: la singularité de la Dynamique. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 100 (1): 49–81.Google Scholar
  8. Gueroult, Martial. 1934. Dynamique et métaphysique Leibniziennes. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
  9. Huygens, Christiaan. 1993. ‘Penetralia motus’: la fondazione relativistica della meccanica in Christiaan Huygens, con l’edizione del Codex Hugeniorum 7A. Ed. Gianfranco Mormino. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar
  10. Itokazu, Anastasia Guidi. 2009. On the Equivalence of Hypotheses in Part I of Johannes Kepler’s New Astronomy. Journal for the History of Astronomy 40 (2): 173–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kepler, Johannis. 1984. The Birth of History and Philosophy of Science: Kepler’s a Defence of Tycho Against Ursus with Essays on Its Provenance and Significance. Ed. and anno. with supplementary essays by N. Jardine. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.Google Scholar
  12. Kepler, Johannes. 1990. Gesammelte Werke Vol. III. Ed. Kepler-Kommission Der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. München: C.H. Beck’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
  13. Kepler, Johannes. 1992. New Astronomy. Trans. William H. Donahue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Mormino, Gianfranco. 2011. Leibniz entre Huygens et Newton: force centrifuge et relativite du mouvement dans les lettres de 1694. In Natur und Subjekt. IX. Internationaler Leibniz-Kongress Vorträge, ed. Herbert Breger, Jurgen Herbst, and Sven Erdner, vol. 2, 697–705. Hannover: Druckerei Hartmann.Google Scholar
  15. Newton, Issac. 1972. Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy, Vol. I. Trans. Andrew Motte and ed. Florian Cajori. Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  16. Slowik, Edward. 2006. The ‘Dynamics’ of Leibnizian Relationism: Reference Frames and Force in Leibniz’s Plenum. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 37: 617–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Stein, Howard. 1977. Some Philosophical Prehistory of General Relativity. In Foundations of Space-Time Theories. Ed. John Earman et. al. 3–49. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  18. Voelkel, James. 2001. The Composition of Kepler’s Astronomia Nova. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tzuchien Tho
    • 1
  1. 1.Università degli Studi di MilanoMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations