Skip to main content

New Housing Projects in Latin European Cities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Urban Visions
  • 2993 Accesses

Abstract

The reinterpretation of recent residential interventions in northern Italy, the Madrid metropolitan area and the ZAC Masséna project in Paris highlights the specific quest that has emerged in the new millennium: the return to the compact city, to experimentation with the urban block and to revive the role of the street. With criticism of the open design of the Modern Movement, complete, contemporary projects are able to rethink the concept of the urban block through the morphological wealth that good twentieth-century architecture managed to produce. Paris imposes a series of classical compositional themes to its open block, such as the continuity of the podium, while Sanpolino in Italy achieves great urban diversity with a wealth of typological offerings and density.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Choay, F. 1994. Le règne de l’urbain et la mort de la ville. In La Ville, art et architecture en Europe 18701993, 26–35. Paris: Centre Georges Pompidou.

  2. 2.

    EMVS, Empresa Municipal de la Vivienda y Suelo de Madrid.

  3. 3.

    “Reflecting on the development of a type of block that allows an urban structure to be created, while keeping the modular character of the buildings.” Le Grand Paris .

  4. 4.

    The Grand Paris Project is the document that contains the plans for the reorganisation of the Paris Region, the accompanying law for which was published on 5 June 2010. The themes for “Building a city over the city” are few and expressed in a few pages of a manifesto, accompanied by the morphological designs drawn up by the big names who are working on the city. Jean Philippe Vassal and Anne Lacaton wrote: “We have to build MORE, build bigger, build WITH, build BETTER and more economically. We have to head towards the maximum instead of defining a minimum. Change should be encouraged instead of blocking everything. Things should be added rather than demolished. Densify instead of disperse”. Roland Castro proposed a shift “from urban renewal to urban remodelling”, while Ateliers Christian de Portzamparc revived the concepts of “îlots ouverts and neighbourhoods in evolution”.

  5. 5.

    Smithson, A., ed. 1968. Team 10 Primer. London: Studio Vista.

References

  • Consonni, G. 2009. L’internità dell’esterno. Scritti sull’abitare e il costruire. Milano: Maggioli editore.

    Google Scholar 

  • López de Lucio, R. 2013. Vivienda colectiva, espacio público y ciudad. Evolución y crisis en el diseño de tejidos residenciales 1860–2010. Buenos Aires: Nobuko.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panerai, P., J. Castex, J.-C. Depaule, and I. Samuels. 2004. Urban Forms: The Death and Life of the Urban Block [Formes urbaines, 1980]. Oxford: Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sieverts, T. 2003. Cities Without Cities: An Interpretation of the Zwischenstadt [Zwischenstadt, 1998]. London: Spon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Further Readings

  • Fernández Per, A., J. Mozas, and J. Arpa. 2011. Density is Home. Housing by A+T Research Group. Vitoria, Gasteiz: A+T Architecture Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández Per, A., J. Mozas, A.S. Ollero, and A. Deza. 2015. Why Density? Debunking the Myth of the Cubic Watermelon. Vitoria, Gasteiz: A+T Architecture Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lleó, B., and C. Sambricio. 2006. Informe Habitar. Madrid: Empresa Municipal de la Vivienda y Suelo de Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • López de Lucio, R., and A. Hernández-Aja. 1995. Los nuevos ensanches de Madrid, la morfología residencial de la periferia reciente, 1985–1993. Madrid: Ayuntamiento de Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucan, J. 2012. Où va la ville aujourd’hui? Forme Urbaines et mixités. Paris: Éditions de la Villette.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montaner, J.M., and Z. Muxí. 2006. Habitar el presente: Vivienda en España: sociedad, ciudad, tecnología y recursos. Madrid: Ministerio de Vivienda.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulazzani, M. 2009. Un’idea di città sociale: il nuovo quartiere Sanpolino a Brescia. Casabella 774: 34–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reale, L. 2008. Densità città residenza. Tecniche di densificazione e strategie anti-sprawl. Roma: Gangemi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Secchi, B. 2006. Prima lezione di Urbanistica. Bari: Laterza.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villasante de la Puente, J. (ed.). 2005. EMVS Concursos de viviendas/ Housing Competitions: Madrid 2003–2005. Madrid: Empresa Municipal de la Vivienda y Suelo de Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Orsina Simona Pierini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pierini, O.S. (2018). New Housing Projects in Latin European Cities. In: Díez Medina, C., Monclús, J. (eds) Urban Visions. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59047-9_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics