Advertisement

Who Wants to Chat on a MOOC? Lessons from a Peer Recommender System

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10254)

Abstract

Peer recommender systems (PRS) in MOOCs have been shown to help reducing attrition and increase performance of those who use them. But who are the students using them and what are their motivations? And why are some students reluctant to use them? To answer these questions, we present a study where we implemented a chat-based PRS that has been used during a MOOC session involving 6,170 students. Our analyses indicate that PRS-users are students unsatisfied by other means of interactions already available (forums, social networks…), and that they seem to use it more to share emotions than to learn together, or to assess their progression against their peers.

Keywords

Synchronous chat Peer recommender system Synchronous collaboration in MOOC Social learning 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Unow, and in particular Régis Millet for their technical assistance.

References

  1. 1.
    Manouselis, N., Drachsler, H., Vuorikari, R., Hummel, H., Koper, R.: Recommender systems in technology enhanced learning. In: Ricci, F., Rokach, L., Shapira, B., Kantor, P.B. (eds.) Recommender Systems Handbook, pp. 387–415. Springer, New York (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Klašnja-Milićević, A., Ivanović, M., Nanopoulos, A.: Recommender systems in e-learning environments: a survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. Artif. Intell. Rev. 44, 571–604 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tang, T.Y., Daniel, B.K., Romero, C.: Recommender systems in social and online learning environments. Expert Syst. 32, 261–263 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ferschke, O., Yang, D., Tomar, G., Rosé, C.P.: Positive impact of collaborative chat participation in an edX MOOC. In: Conati, C., Heffernan, N., Mitrovic, A., Verdejo, M. (eds.) AIED 2015. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9112, pp. 115–124. Springer, Cham (2015). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-19773-9_12 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yang, D., Wen, M., Rosé, C.P.: Peer influence on attrition in massive open online courses. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, London, UK, pp. 405–406 (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Labarthe, H., Bouchet, F., Bachelet, R., Yacef, K.: Does a peer recommender foster students’ engagement in MOOCs? In: Barnes, T., Chi, M., and Feng, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Educational Data Mining. pp. 418–423. International Educational Data Mining Society (IEDMS), Raleigh (2016)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zheng, S., Rosson, M.B., Shih, P.C., Carroll, J.M.: Understanding student motivation, behaviors and perceptions in MOOCs. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, pp. 1882–1895. ACM, New York (2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kirschner, F., Paas, F., Kirschner, P.A.: A cognitive load approach to collaborative learning: united brains for complex tasks. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 21, 31–42 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Labarthe, H., Bachelet, R., Bouchet, F., Yacef, K.: Increasing MOOC completion rates through social interactions: a recommendation system. In: Khalil, M., Ebner, M., Kopp, M., Lorenz, A., and Kalz, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the European Stakeholder Summit on Experiences and Best Practices in and Around MOOCs, Graz, Austria, pp. 471–480 (2016)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bachelet, R.: Cours et MOOC de gestion de projet : formations en vidéo, ppt, pdf et modèles de documents. http://gestiondeprojet.pm
  11. 11.
    Bouchet, F., Bachelet, R.: Do MOOC students come back for more? Recurring students in the GdP MOOC. In: Proceedings of the European MOOCs Stakeholders Summit 2015, Mons, Belgium, pp. 174–182 (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Alario-Hoyos, C., Perez-Sanagustin, M., Delgado-Kloos, C., Munoz-Organero, M.: Delving into participants’ profiles and use of social tools in MOOCs. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 3, 260–266 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
    Coetzee, D., Fox, A., Hearst, M.A., Hartmann, B.: Chatrooms in MOOCs: all talk and no action. In: Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale Conference, pp. 127–136. ACM, New York (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, CNRS, LIP6 UMR 7606ParisFrance
  2. 2.Centrale Lille, University of LilleLilleFrance
  3. 3.School of Information TechnologiesThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations