Skip to main content

Who Wants to Chat on a MOOC? Lessons from a Peer Recommender System

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Digital Education: Out to the World and Back to the Campus (EMOOCs 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10254))

Included in the following conference series:


Peer recommender systems (PRS) in MOOCs have been shown to help reducing attrition and increase performance of those who use them. But who are the students using them and what are their motivations? And why are some students reluctant to use them? To answer these questions, we present a study where we implemented a chat-based PRS that has been used during a MOOC session involving 6,170 students. Our analyses indicate that PRS-users are students unsatisfied by other means of interactions already available (forums, social networks…), and that they seem to use it more to share emotions than to learn together, or to assess their progression against their peers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions


  1. Manouselis, N., Drachsler, H., Vuorikari, R., Hummel, H., Koper, R.: Recommender systems in technology enhanced learning. In: Ricci, F., Rokach, L., Shapira, B., Kantor, P.B. (eds.) Recommender Systems Handbook, pp. 387–415. Springer, New York (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Klašnja-Milićević, A., Ivanović, M., Nanopoulos, A.: Recommender systems in e-learning environments: a survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. Artif. Intell. Rev. 44, 571–604 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tang, T.Y., Daniel, B.K., Romero, C.: Recommender systems in social and online learning environments. Expert Syst. 32, 261–263 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ferschke, O., Yang, D., Tomar, G., Rosé, C.P.: Positive impact of collaborative chat participation in an edX MOOC. In: Conati, C., Heffernan, N., Mitrovic, A., Verdejo, M. (eds.) AIED 2015. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9112, pp. 115–124. Springer, Cham (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19773-9_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Yang, D., Wen, M., Rosé, C.P.: Peer influence on attrition in massive open online courses. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, London, UK, pp. 405–406 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Labarthe, H., Bouchet, F., Bachelet, R., Yacef, K.: Does a peer recommender foster students’ engagement in MOOCs? In: Barnes, T., Chi, M., and Feng, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Educational Data Mining. pp. 418–423. International Educational Data Mining Society (IEDMS), Raleigh (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zheng, S., Rosson, M.B., Shih, P.C., Carroll, J.M.: Understanding student motivation, behaviors and perceptions in MOOCs. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, pp. 1882–1895. ACM, New York (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kirschner, F., Paas, F., Kirschner, P.A.: A cognitive load approach to collaborative learning: united brains for complex tasks. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 21, 31–42 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Labarthe, H., Bachelet, R., Bouchet, F., Yacef, K.: Increasing MOOC completion rates through social interactions: a recommendation system. In: Khalil, M., Ebner, M., Kopp, M., Lorenz, A., and Kalz, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the European Stakeholder Summit on Experiences and Best Practices in and Around MOOCs, Graz, Austria, pp. 471–480 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bachelet, R.: Cours et MOOC de gestion de projet : formations en vidéo, ppt, pdf et modèles de documents.

  11. Bouchet, F., Bachelet, R.: Do MOOC students come back for more? Recurring students in the GdP MOOC. In: Proceedings of the European MOOCs Stakeholders Summit 2015, Mons, Belgium, pp. 174–182 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Alario-Hoyos, C., Perez-Sanagustin, M., Delgado-Kloos, C., Munoz-Organero, M.: Delving into participants’ profiles and use of social tools in MOOCs. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 3, 260–266 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Measuring our first eight courses.

  14. Coetzee, D., Fox, A., Hearst, M.A., Hartmann, B.: Chatrooms in MOOCs: all talk and no action. In: Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale Conference, pp. 127–136. ACM, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors would like to thank Unow, and in particular Régis Millet for their technical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to François Bouchet .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bouchet, F., Labarthe, H., Bachelet, R., Yacef, K. (2017). Who Wants to Chat on a MOOC? Lessons from a Peer Recommender System. In: Delgado Kloos, C., Jermann, P., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Seaton, D., White, S. (eds) Digital Education: Out to the World and Back to the Campus. EMOOCs 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10254. Springer, Cham.

Download citation

  • DOI:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59043-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59044-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics