Advertisement

Measuring the Degree of Innovation in Education Through the Implementation of an Indicator Based on Analyzing MOOC-Related Activities

Conference paper
  • 1.8k Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10254)

Abstract

Nowadays, the digital transformation is affecting any task, activity, process that is done in any organization or even in our daily life activities. The education sector, considered as one of the leading sectors in terms of innovation through technology, is also facing a transformation in which digital technology is rapidly evolving. In this context, the Massive Open Online Courses (MOOC) phenomenon has gained a lot of attraction due to the capability of reaching thousands or even millions of students from all over the world. However, the activities related to MOOCs are not yet being evaluated or quantified as a driver of change. Since the creation of MOOCs requires support and institutional commitment to deliver high-quality courses on technology-based platforms, it seems reasonable to measure the degree of innovation in education through the definition of an indicator that collects the commitment of an institution or a person to this new environment of digital education. That is why, in this paper, authors present the definition of a novel indicator and several potential metrics to represent and quantify the degree of innovation in education in universities. Furthermore, a case study is conducted to evaluate 3 different metrics on 36 European universities in the context of the edX and Coursera platforms.

Keywords

Innovation Indicator Performance MOOC University Digital education 

References

  1. 1.
    Billaut, J.-C., Bouyssou, D., Vincke, P.: Should you believe in the Shanghai ranking? Scientometrics 84(1), 237–263 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Docampo, D.: Reproducibility of the Shanghai academic ranking of world universities results. Scientometrics 94(2), 567–587 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    OECD: Measuring Innovation in Education. OECD Publishing, Paris (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Christensen, G., Steinmetz, A., Alcorn, B., Bennett, A., Woods, D., Emanuel, E.J.: The MOOC phenomenon: who takes massive open online courses and why? SSRN Electron. J., 1–25 (2013). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2350964
  5. 5.
    Leony, D., Muñoz-Merino, P.J., Ruipérez-Valiente, J.A., Pardo, A., Kloos, C.D.: Detection and evaluation of emotions in massive open online courses. J-JUCS 21(5), 638–655 (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rizzardini, R.H., García-Peñalvo, F.J., Kloos, C.D.: Massive open online courses: combining methodologies and architecture for a success learning. J-JUCS 21(5), 636–637 (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    de Amescua, A., Alvarez-Rodríguez, J.M., Sanchez-Segura, M.-I., Medina-Domínguez, F.: An agile framework definition for creating an engineering massive open online course from scratch A case study. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 35(5(B)), 2360–2373 (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Alvarez-Rodŕiguez, J.M., Clement, J., Gayo, J.E.L., Farhan, H., Ordoñez De Pablos, P.: Publishing statistical data following the linked open data principles: the web index project. In: Cases on Open-Linked Data and Semantic Web Applications, pp. 199–226. IGI Global (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Downes, S.: The quality of massive open online courses. In: Khan, B.H., Ally, M. (eds.) International Handbook of E-Learning. Theoretical Perspective, vol. 1. Routledg, 22 March 2015Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Clark, D.: MOOCs: taxonomy of 8 types of MOOC (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Conole, G.: MOOCs as disruptive technologies: strategies for enhancing the learner experience and quality of MOOCs. RED Rev. Educ. Distancia 39, 1–17 (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Guàrdia, L., Maina, M., Sangrà, A.: MOOC design principles: a pedagogical approach from the learner’s perspective. ELearning Pap. 33, 1–6 (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mackness, J., Waite, M., Roberts, G., Lovegrove, E.: Learning in a small, task–oriented, connectivist MOOC: pedagogical issues and implications for higher education. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 14(4), 140–159 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    McAndrew, P.: Learning from open design: running a learning design MOOC. ELearning Pap. 33, 1–4 (2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Scott, I., Kendra, L., Woodgate, A.: How to Grow Your Own MOOC with Coursera. University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (2014)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kerr, J.: Building and Executing MOOCs. University of Glasgow, Glasgow (2015)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Alario-Hoyos, C., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Cormier, D., Kloos, C.D.: Proposal for a conceptual framework for educators to describe and design MOOCs. J-JUCS 20(1), 6–23 (2014)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Alario-Hoyos, C., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Kloos, C.D., Muñoz-Merino, P.J.: Recommendations for the design and deployment of MOOCs: insights about the MOOC digital education of the future deployed in MiríadaX, pp. 403–408 (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Computer Science and Engineering DepartmentCarlos III University of MadridLeganésSpain

Personalised recommendations