Abstract
In this chapter, the model of parental choice is applied to understanding the mating patterns in post-industrial societies. The model predicts that individual mate choice is the primary sexual selection force, with all other sexual selection forces being weak. It also predicts that, in terms of parental choice, female parents exercise more influence than male parents over mate choice. Consistent with these predictions, in post-industrial societies individuals choose their own mates. Parents still exercise influence, but they do so indirectly with the use of several manipulation tactics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Apostolou, M. (2011). Parental influence over mate choice in a post-industrial context. Letters on Evolutionary Behavioral Science, 2, 13–15.
Apostolou, M. (2013a). Do as we wish: Parental tactics of mate choice manipulation. Evolutionary Psychology, 11, 795–813.
Apostolou, M. (2013b). The evolution of rape: The fitness benefits and costs of a forced-sex mating strategy in an evolutionary context. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18, 484–490.
Apostolou, M. (2014). Sexual selection under parental choice: The evolution of human mating behaviour. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
Apostolou, M. (2015). Past, present and why people struggle to establish and maintain intimate relationships. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 9, 257–269.
Apostolou, M., Kasapi, K., & Arakliti, A. (2015). Will they do as we wish? An investigation of the effectiveness of parental manipulation on mating behavior. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 1, 28–36.
Apostolou, M., & Papageorgi, I. (2014). Parental mate choice manipulation tactics: Exploring prevalence, sex and personality effects. Evolutionary Psychology, 12, 588–620.
Apostolou, M., & Zacharia, M. (2015). Parental choice in children’s minds: Exploring personality, sex and age contingencies. Social Influence, 10, 168–179.
Atrash, H. K., & Hogue, C. J. (1990). The effect of pregnancy termination on future reproduction. Baillière’s Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 4, 391–405.
Blau, F. D., & Kahn, L. M. (2007). The gender pay gap: Have women gone as far as they can? Academy of Management Perspectives, 21, 7–23.
Buss, D. M. (2003). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating (2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books.
Coonz, S. (2006). Marriage, a history: How love conquered marriage. New York: Penguin.
Ikels, C. (1985). Parental perspectives on the significance of marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 253–264.
Lalumiére, M. L., Harris, G. T., Quinsey, V. L., & Rice, M. E. (2005). The causes of rape. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Perilloux, C., Fleischman, D. S., & Buss, D. M. (2008). The daughter guarding hypothesis: Parental influence on, and emotional reaction to, offspring’s mating behavior. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 217–233.
Pinker, S. (2011). The better angels of our nature. New York: Penguin.
Stiglmayer, A. (1994). Mass rape: The war against women in Bosnia-Herzegovina. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Sussman, M. B. (1953). Parental participation in mate selection and its effect upon family continuity. Social Forces, 1, 76–81.
Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man: 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Apostolou, M. (2017). Sexual Selection Under Parental Choice in Post-industrial Societies. In: Sexual Selection in Homo sapiens. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58999-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58999-2_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58998-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-58999-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)