Abstract
In this chapter the authors provide an overview of the evidence-for-education landscape across countries. Although the importance of using evidence to inform policy and practice in education was identified over 20 years ago, many education systems are still struggling to make this a reality. The enormous expansion of publicly available data on education and its increased access by diverse stakeholders has only contributed to the complexity of the endeavour. In recent years it has become clear that providing data and research and promoting evidence-informed policy does not ensure that the knowledge will actually be used. Furthermore, data and research can and will also be misused, selectively used or even abused. Therefore, the appropriate use of knowledge should be a high priority on the evidence agenda in education. Illustrated by two country cases the authors argue for a systematic effort to promote appropriate use through building capacity at the local level and creating a culture of evaluation and self-reflection across the system. Peer learning networks and the engagement of a broader range of stakeholders can be powerful levers for establishing a holistic culture for the use of evidence.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Blanchenay, P., Burns, T., & Köster, F. (2014). Shifting responsibilities – 20 years of education devolution in Sweden: A governing complex education systems case study (OECD Education Working Papers, No. 104). Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5jz2jg1rqrd7-en
Blanchenay, P., & Burns, T. (2016). Policy experimentation in complex education systems. In T. Burns & F. Köster (Eds.), Governing education in a complex world (pp. 161–186). Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264255364-10-en.
Bunar, N., Barham, E., & Pater, C. (unpublished n.d.). Market mechanisms in Swedish schooling, an explorative study of two Swedish municipalities, Gävle and Västerås.
Burns, T., & Köster, F. (2016). Modern governance challenges in education. In T. Burns & F. Köster (Eds.), Governing education in a complex world. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264255364-3-en.
Burns, T., Köster, F., & Fuster, M. (2016). Education governance in action: Lessons from case studies. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264262829-en.
Burns, T., & Schuller, T. (2008). Evidence-informed policy in education: New opportunities and challenges. In R. Desjardins & K. Rubensen (Eds.), Research of policy and research for policy in an era of transnational education policy making. Aarhaus: Aarhaus University Press.
Busemeyer, M., & Vossiek, J. (2015). Reforming education governance through local capacity-building: A case study of the ‘Learning Locally’ programme in Germany (OECD Education Working Papers, No. 113). Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5js6bhl2mxjg-en
Carlgren, I. (2009). The Swedish comprehensive school, lost in transition? Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 12(4), 633–649.
Clarke, B., et al. (2014). Mechanisms and the evidence hierarchy. Topoi, 33/2, 339–360.
Commissie Monard. (2014). Evaluatie Pedagogische Begeleidingsdiensten, Permanente ondersteuningscellen en VZW Samenwerkingsverband Netgebonden Begeleidingsdiensten. Overkoepelend rapport [Evaluation Pedagogical Advisory Services, Permanent Support Centres and Partnership Networked Advisory Services]. Brussels: Ministry of Education and Training.
Davies, H., Nutley, S., & Smith, P. (Eds.). (2000). What works?: Evidence-based policy and practice in public services. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Elacqua, G., Schneider, M., & Buckley, J. (2006). School choice in Chile: Is it class or the classroom? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 25(3), 577–601.
Fazekas, M., & Burns, T. (2012). Exploring the complex interaction between governance and knowledge in education (OECD Education Working Papers, No. 67). Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k9flcx2l340-en
Fuller, S. (2000). The governance of science: Ideology and the future of the open society. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Hallsworth, M., Parker, S. & Rutter, J. (2011). Policy-making in the real world. Institute for Government.
Henkel, M. (2000). Academic identities and policy change in higher education. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Hopfenbeck, T., et al. (2013). Balancing trust and accountability? The assessment for learning programme in Norway: A governing complex education systems case study (OECD Education Working Papers, No. 97). Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k3txnpqlsnn-en
Kogan, M. (2007). Modes of knowledge and patterns of power. In S. Sörlin & H. Vessuri (Eds.), Knowledge society vs. knowledge economy: Knowledge, power, and politics (pp. 35–52). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lewin, L., et al. (2014). Staten får inte abdikera, om kommunaliseringen av den svenska skolan [The State must not abdicate on the municipalisation of the Swedish school system], Statens Offentliga Utredningar SOU 2014:5. Stockholm.
Loeb, S., D.N. Plank, (2008), Learning what works: Continuous improvement in California’s education system, Policy Brief, 8 4, Policy Analysis for California Education, Berkeley.
Mazurkiewicz, G., Walczak, B., Jewdokimow, M. (2014). Implementation of a new school supervision system in Poland (OECD Education Working Papers, No. 111). Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5jxrlxrxgc6b-en
Ministry of Education and Training and University of Antwerp Edubron Research Group. (2010). OECD review on evaluation and assessment frameworks for improving school outcomes, country background report for the flemish community of Belgium. www.oecd.org/edu/evaluationpolicy
Moss, G. (2013). Research, policy and knowledge flows in education: What counts in knowledge mobilisation. Contemporary Social Science, 8(33), 237–248.
NAE. (2009). What influences educational achievement in Swedish schools? In A systematic review and summary analysis. Stockholm: National Agency for Education (Skolverket).
NAE. (2011). Municipal responsibility in practice; a qualitative study, Report 382. Stockholm: National Agency for Education (Skolverket).
Nutley, S., Walter, I., & Davies, H. (2007). Using evidence: How research can inform public services. Bristol: Policy Press.
O’Day, J. A. (2002). Complexity, accountability, and school improvement. Harvard Educational Review, 72(3), 293–329. www.hepg.org/her-home/issues/harvard-educational-review-volume-72-issue-3/herarticle/_48.
OECD. (1995). Educational research and development – trends issues and challenges. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2007). Evidence in education: Linking research and policy. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264033672-en.
OECD. (2009). Working out change: Systemic innovation in vocational education and training. Paris: Educational Research and Innovation, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264075924-en.
OECD. (2011). School evaluation in the flemish community of Belgium, OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education. Paris: OECD, Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264116726en.
OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 results: Excellence through equity: Giving every student the chance to succeed (Vol. II). Paris: PISA, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264201132-en.
Rekenhof. (2011). Verslag van het Rekenhof over het toezicht op de kwaliteit van het onderwijs door de inspectie [Report of the Court of Audit on the oversight of the quality of education by the Inspectorate]. Brussels: Vlaams Parlement.
Rouw, R., et al. (2016). United in diversity – A complexity perspective on the role of attainment targets in quality assurance in Flanders: A GCES case study of Flanders (Belgium) (OECD Education Working Papers No. 139). Paris: OECD Publishing.
Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M. C., & Gray, A. J. (1996). Evidence based medicine; what it is and what it isn’t. British Medical Journal, 312, 71–72.
Schildkamp, K., Karbautzki, L., & Vanhoof, J. (2014). Exploring data use practices around Europe: Identifying enablers and barriers. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 42, 15–24.
Taylor, C. (2009). Choice competition, and segregation in a United Kingdom education market. American Journal of Education, 115(4), 549–568.
Van Twist, M., et al. (2013). Coping with very weak primary schools: Towards smart interventions in Dutch education policy (OECD Education Working Papers, No. 98). Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k3txnpnhld7-en
Van Zanten, A. (2003). Middle-class parents and social mix in French urban schools: Reproduction and transformation of class relations in education. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 13(2), 107–123.
Wilkoszewski, H., & Sundby, E. (2014). Steering from the centre: New modes of governance in multi-level education eystems (OECD Education Working Papers, No. 109). Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5jxswcfs4s5g-en
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Burns, T., Rouw, R. (2017). The Evidence Agenda in Education: An International Perspective. In: Eryaman, M., Schneider, B. (eds) Evidence and Public Good in Educational Policy, Research and Practice. Educational Governance Research, vol 6. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58850-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58850-6_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58849-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-58850-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)