Skip to main content

The Evidence Agenda in Education: An International Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 762 Accesses

Part of the book series: Educational Governance Research ((EGTU,volume 6))

Abstract

In this chapter the authors provide an overview of the evidence-for-education landscape across countries. Although the importance of using evidence to inform policy and practice in education was identified over 20 years ago, many education systems are still struggling to make this a reality. The enormous expansion of publicly available data on education and its increased access by diverse stakeholders has only contributed to the complexity of the endeavour. In recent years it has become clear that providing data and research and promoting evidence-informed policy does not ensure that the knowledge will actually be used. Furthermore, data and research can and will also be misused, selectively used or even abused. Therefore, the appropriate use of knowledge should be a high priority on the evidence agenda in education. Illustrated by two country cases the authors argue for a systematic effort to promote appropriate use through building capacity at the local level and creating a culture of evaluation and self-reflection across the system. Peer learning networks and the engagement of a broader range of stakeholders can be powerful levers for establishing a holistic culture for the use of evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Blanchenay, P., Burns, T., & Köster, F. (2014). Shifting responsibilities – 20 years of education devolution in Sweden: A governing complex education systems case study (OECD Education Working Papers, No. 104). Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5jz2jg1rqrd7-en

  • Blanchenay, P., & Burns, T. (2016). Policy experimentation in complex education systems. In T. Burns & F. Köster (Eds.), Governing education in a complex world (pp. 161–186). Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264255364-10-en.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bunar, N., Barham, E., & Pater, C. (unpublished n.d.). Market mechanisms in Swedish schooling, an explorative study of two Swedish municipalities, Gävle and Västerås.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, T., & Köster, F. (2016). Modern governance challenges in education. In T. Burns & F. Köster (Eds.), Governing education in a complex world. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264255364-3-en.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, T., Köster, F., & Fuster, M. (2016). Education governance in action: Lessons from case studies. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264262829-en.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, T., & Schuller, T. (2008). Evidence-informed policy in education: New opportunities and challenges. In R. Desjardins & K. Rubensen (Eds.), Research of policy and research for policy in an era of transnational education policy making. Aarhaus: Aarhaus University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busemeyer, M., & Vossiek, J. (2015). Reforming education governance through local capacity-building: A case study of the ‘Learning Locally’ programme in Germany (OECD Education Working Papers, No. 113). Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5js6bhl2mxjg-en

  • Carlgren, I. (2009). The Swedish comprehensive school, lost in transition? Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 12(4), 633–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, B., et al. (2014). Mechanisms and the evidence hierarchy. Topoi, 33/2, 339–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commissie Monard. (2014). Evaluatie Pedagogische Begeleidingsdiensten, Permanente ondersteuningscellen en VZW Samenwerkingsverband Netgebonden Begeleidingsdiensten. Overkoepelend rapport [Evaluation Pedagogical Advisory Services, Permanent Support Centres and Partnership Networked Advisory Services]. Brussels: Ministry of Education and Training.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, H., Nutley, S., & Smith, P. (Eds.). (2000). What works?: Evidence-based policy and practice in public services. Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elacqua, G., Schneider, M., & Buckley, J. (2006). School choice in Chile: Is it class or the classroom? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 25(3), 577–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fazekas, M., & Burns, T. (2012). Exploring the complex interaction between governance and knowledge in education (OECD Education Working Papers, No. 67). Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k9flcx2l340-en

  • Fuller, S. (2000). The governance of science: Ideology and the future of the open society. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallsworth, M., Parker, S. & Rutter, J. (2011). Policy-making in the real world. Institute for Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henkel, M. (2000). Academic identities and policy change in higher education. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopfenbeck, T., et al. (2013). Balancing trust and accountability? The assessment for learning programme in Norway: A governing complex education systems case study (OECD Education Working Papers, No. 97). Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k3txnpqlsnn-en

  • Kogan, M. (2007). Modes of knowledge and patterns of power. In S. Sörlin & H. Vessuri (Eds.), Knowledge society vs. knowledge economy: Knowledge, power, and politics (pp. 35–52). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, L., et al. (2014). Staten får inte abdikera, om kommunaliseringen av den svenska skolan [The State must not abdicate on the municipalisation of the Swedish school system], Statens Offentliga Utredningar SOU 2014:5. Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeb, S., D.N. Plank, (2008), Learning what works: Continuous improvement in California’s education system, Policy Brief, 8 4, Policy Analysis for California Education, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazurkiewicz, G., Walczak, B., Jewdokimow, M. (2014). Implementation of a new school supervision system in Poland (OECD Education Working Papers, No. 111). Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5jxrlxrxgc6b-en

  • Ministry of Education and Training and University of Antwerp Edubron Research Group. (2010). OECD review on evaluation and assessment frameworks for improving school outcomes, country background report for the flemish community of Belgium. www.oecd.org/edu/evaluationpolicy

  • Moss, G. (2013). Research, policy and knowledge flows in education: What counts in knowledge mobilisation. Contemporary Social Science, 8(33), 237–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NAE. (2009). What influences educational achievement in Swedish schools? In A systematic review and summary analysis. Stockholm: National Agency for Education (Skolverket).

    Google Scholar 

  • NAE. (2011). Municipal responsibility in practice; a qualitative study, Report 382. Stockholm: National Agency for Education (Skolverket).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nutley, S., Walter, I., & Davies, H. (2007). Using evidence: How research can inform public services. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Day, J. A. (2002). Complexity, accountability, and school improvement. Harvard Educational Review, 72(3), 293–329. www.hepg.org/her-home/issues/harvard-educational-review-volume-72-issue-3/herarticle/_48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (1995). Educational research and development – trends issues and challenges. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2007). Evidence in education: Linking research and policy. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264033672-en.

  • OECD. (2009). Working out change: Systemic innovation in vocational education and training. Paris: Educational Research and Innovation, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264075924-en.

  • OECD. (2011). School evaluation in the flemish community of Belgium, OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education. Paris: OECD, Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264116726en.

  • OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 results: Excellence through equity: Giving every student the chance to succeed (Vol. II). Paris: PISA, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264201132-en.

  • Rekenhof. (2011). Verslag van het Rekenhof over het toezicht op de kwaliteit van het onderwijs door de inspectie [Report of the Court of Audit on the oversight of the quality of education by the Inspectorate]. Brussels: Vlaams Parlement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouw, R., et al. (2016). United in diversity – A complexity perspective on the role of attainment targets in quality assurance in Flanders: A GCES case study of Flanders (Belgium) (OECD Education Working Papers No. 139). Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M. C., & Gray, A. J. (1996). Evidence based medicine; what it is and what it isn’t. British Medical Journal, 312, 71–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schildkamp, K., Karbautzki, L., & Vanhoof, J. (2014). Exploring data use practices around Europe: Identifying enablers and barriers. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 42, 15–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (2009). Choice competition, and segregation in a United Kingdom education market. American Journal of Education, 115(4), 549–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Twist, M., et al. (2013). Coping with very weak primary schools: Towards smart interventions in Dutch education policy (OECD Education Working Papers, No. 98). Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k3txnpnhld7-en

  • Van Zanten, A. (2003). Middle-class parents and social mix in French urban schools: Reproduction and transformation of class relations in education. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 13(2), 107–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkoszewski, H., & Sundby, E. (2014). Steering from the centre: New modes of governance in multi-level education eystems (OECD Education Working Papers, No. 109). Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5jxswcfs4s5g-en

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tracey Burns .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Burns, T., Rouw, R. (2017). The Evidence Agenda in Education: An International Perspective. In: Eryaman, M., Schneider, B. (eds) Evidence and Public Good in Educational Policy, Research and Practice. Educational Governance Research, vol 6. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58850-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58850-6_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58849-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-58850-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics