Advertisement

Literary Gifts: Performance and Collaboration in the Arundel/Lumley Family Manuscripts

  • Alexandra DayEmail author
Chapter
  • 174 Downloads
Part of the Early Modern Literature in History book series (EMLH)

Abstract

This chapter argues that the manuscript gift volumes presented to the Earl of Arundel by his children in the 1550s and preserved in the family library are rhetorically and materially significant artifacts. These literary gifts, written in Latin by John Radcliffe, Mary Howard, and Jane Lumley, style and stage their own collaborative production in multiple, overlapping and sometimes contradictory ways. Political, familial, and scholarly relations are all foregrounded in the volumes’ dedicatory epistles and in the play of associations deployed humanist scholarship, material economies, gender, and even family are exposed as complex performances which, together, defy the simplistic connotations of these manuscripts as simply schoolroom texts.

Bibliography

  1. Austin, J. L. How to Do Things with Words: The William James Lectures Delivered at Harvard University in 1955. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beilin, Elaine V. Redeeming Eve: Women Writers of the English Renaissance. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
  3. Belsey, Catherine. Shakespeare and the Loss of Eden: The Construction of Family Values in Early Modern Culture. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ———. Shakespeare in Theory and Practice. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Butler, Judith. Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex.” New York: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar
  6. Cicero, Marcus Tullius. De Officiis. Edited and translated by Walter Miller. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1961 (first published 1913).Google Scholar
  7. Crane, Frank D. “Euripides, Erasmus, and Lady Lumley.” Classical Journal 39, no. 4 (1944): 223–228.Google Scholar
  8. Crawford, Julie. “Reconsidering Early Modern Women’s Reading, or, How Margaret Hoby Read Her De Mornay.” Huntington Library Quarterly 73, no. 2 (2010): 193–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Darnton, Robert. “What Is the History of Books?”. Daedalus: Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 111, no. 3 (1982): 65–83.Google Scholar
  10. Derrida, Jacques. Limited Inc, translated by Samuel Weber and Jeffrey Mehlman, edited by Gerald Graff. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  11. Ellis, Roger. “Translation for and by the Young in 16th-Century England: Erasmus and the Arundel Children.” In Thou Sittest at Another Boke… English Studies in Honour of Domenico Pezzini, edited by Giovanni lamartino, Roberta Facchinetti, and Maria Luisa Maggioni, 53–74. Monza, Italy: Polimetrica International Scientific Publisher, 2008.Google Scholar
  12. Elyot, Thomas. The image of gouernance compiled of the actes and sentences notable, of the moste noble Emperour Alexander Seuerus, late translated out of Greke into Englyshe. London: Thomas Berthelet, 1541.Google Scholar
  13. ———. The doctrinall of princis made by the noble oratour Isocrates, and translated out of Greke into Englishe. London: Thomas Berthelet, 1533.Google Scholar
  14. ———. The boke named the gouernour deuised by Sir Thomas Elyot knight. London: Thomas Berthelet, 1531.Google Scholar
  15. Erasmus, Desiderius. Institutio Principis Christiani. Basil: Froben, 1516.Google Scholar
  16. Ezell, Margaret. “‘To Be Your Daughter in Your Pen’: The Social Functions of Literature in the Writings of Lady Elizabeth Brackley and Lady Jane Cavendish.” Huntington Library Quarterly 51, no. 4 (1988): 281–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Findlay, Alison. Playing Spaces in Early Modern Women’s Drama. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
  18. Fleming, Juliet. Graffiti and the Writing Arts of Early Modern England. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2001.Google Scholar
  19. Goodrich, Jaime. “Returning to Lady Lumley’s Schoolroom: Euripides, Isocrates and the Paradox of Women’s Learning.” Renaissance and Reformation 35, no. 4 (2012): 97–117.Google Scholar
  20. Grafton, Anthony and Lisa Jardine. “‘Studied for Action’: How Gabriel Harvey Read His Livy.” Past and Present, no. 129 (1990): 30–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. ———. From Humanism to the Humanities: Education and the Liberal Arts in Fifteenth- and Sixteenth-Century Europe. London: Duckworth, 1986.Google Scholar
  22. Greene, David H. “Lady Lumley and Greek Tragedy.” Classical Journal 36, no. 9 (1941): 537–547.Google Scholar
  23. Heal, Felicity. The Power of Gifts: Gift Exchange in Early Modern England. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hirschfeld, Heather. “Early Modern Collaboration and Theories of Authorship.” PMLA: Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 116, no. 3 (2001): 609–622.Google Scholar
  25. Hodgson-Wright, Stephanie. “Jane Lumley’s Iphigeneia at Aulis: Multum in parvo or, Less is More.” In Readings in Renaissance Women’s Drama: Criticism, History and Performance, 1594–1998, edited by S. P Cerasano and Marion Wynne-Davies, 129–141. London and New York: Routledge, 1998.Google Scholar
  26. Jayne, Sears and Francis R. Johnson. The Lumley Library: The Catalogue of 1609. London: The Trustees of the British Museum, 1956.Google Scholar
  27. Lumley, Jane. British Library, MSS Royal 15.A.i–ii.Google Scholar
  28. ———. Notebook, including Iphigeneia at Aulis. British Library MS Royal 15.A.ix.Google Scholar
  29. Lumley, John, trans. “A certaine treatise cauled the institution of a christen prince or ruler, collected by Erasmus of Rotherodame,” British Library, MS Royal 17.A.xlix. Google Scholar
  30. Mary Ellen Lamb. “Margaret Roper, the Humanist Political Project.” In Ashgate Critical Essays on Women Writers in England, 1550–1700, edited by Elaine V. Beilin, 47–72. Farnham, UK: Ashgate, 2009.Google Scholar
  31. McCutcheon, Elizabeth. “‘Your Daughter, Most Devoted’: The Sententious Writings of Mary Arundel, Duchess of Norfolk, Given to the Twelfth Earl of Arundel.” In Art, Literature and Religion in Early Modern Sussex, edited by Matthew Dimmock, Paul Quinn, and Andrew Hadfield, 147–167. Farnham, UK; Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2014.Google Scholar
  32. Mueller, Janel and Joshua Scodel, eds, Elizabeth I: Translations 1544–1589. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009.Google Scholar
  33. Norfolk, Mary. British Library, MSS Royal 12.A.i–iv.Google Scholar
  34. Parr, Catharine. Prayers or Meditacions. London: Thomas Berthelet, 1545.Google Scholar
  35. Purkiss, Diane. “Introduction.” In Three Tragedies by Renaissance Women, edited by Diane Purkiss, xi–xliii. London: Penguin Books, 1998.Google Scholar
  36. Radcliffe, John. British Library, MS Royal 7.D.ix.Google Scholar
  37. Ross, Sarah Gwyneth. Birth of Feminism: Woman as Intellect in Renaissance Italy and England. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
  38. Smith, Helen. “Grossly Material Things”: Women and Book Production in Early Modern England. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Smith, Rosalind. “‘Le Pouvoir Le Faire Dire’: Marginalia in Mary Queen of Scots’ Book of Hours.” In Material Cultures of Early Modern Women’s Writing, edited by Patricia Pender and Rosalind Smith, 55–75. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.Google Scholar
  40. Straznicky, Martha. Privacy, Playreading, and Women’s Closet Drama, 1550–1700. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
  41. White, Micheline. “Power Couples and Women Writers in Elizabethan England: The Public Voices of Dorcas and Richard Martin and Anne and Hugh Dowriche.” In Framing the Family: Narrative and Representation in the Medieval and Early Modern Periods, edited by Rosalyn Voaden and Diane Wolfthal, 119–138. Tempe: Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies, 2005.Google Scholar
  42. Wynne-Davies, Marion. “The Good Lady Lumley’s Desire: Iphigeneia and the Nonsuch Banqueting House.” In Heroines of the Golden Stage: Women and Drama in Spain and England 1500–1700, edited by Rina Walthaus and Marguerite Corporaal, 111–128. Kassel: Edition Reichenberger, 2008.Google Scholar
  43. ———. Women Writers and Familial Discourse in the English Renaissance: Relative Values. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zemon Davis, Natalie. The Gift in Sixteenth-Century France. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press, 2000.Google Scholar
  45. ———. “Beyond the Market: Books as Gifts in Sixteenth-Century France.” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 33 (1983): 69–88.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of NewcastleNewcastleAustralia

Personalised recommendations