Abstract
At the beginning of this chapter, the authors illustrate the framework for discussing community issues and arguments over the situation of communities in recovery following the Great East Japan Earthquake. During the process of recovery from the earthquake, the functions of mutual support and assistance were maintained in units based on the pre-disaster territorial communities through the stage when people were moved into evacuation shelters. But when people were relocated into temporary housing, the functions collapsed in many cases. Then, it could be said that community-design practice for people affected by the disaster had become one of most important issues, and the authors outline recent efforts in community design taken by national, prefectural, and local municipal governments, and private entities such as NPOs. The support systems for community design and community development formed gradually beginning in 2012 in multiple layers of government. After that, the authors describe a case in community-design practice performed in the city of Kamaishi as one of most successful and innovative cases of community-design practices in the recovery following the Great East Japan Earthquake. As the conclusion, the authors indicate the importance of ensuring the continuity of community development and an elaborate strategy for ensuring that continuity; then they explain the necessity of creating community- design practices based on collaborative multi-actor partnerships in the process of recovery following the Great East Japan Earthquake. These practices could be useful models not only for community design in a recovery following a future disaster, but also for community design in any urban area an aging population and falling birthrates.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In this article, the authors defined community design as making the built and social environment of a community better, almost the same as the Japanese term ‘machizukuri’. The authors selectively use these two terms, community design and machizukuri, according to the context of the description content.
- 2.
According to the interview carried out in September 2011 by the author with the municipal officials in the disaster-stricken municipalities in the southern part of Iwate Prefecture, it was learned that: “Rather than carrying out a carefully crafted decision making in regard to planning with professionals, we were faced with the great number of contracting works we have never experienced, and we were overloaded with the work that we needed a few dozen staff just to take care of them.” On the other hand, residents expressed their hope to have experts with them to carefully review the situation and their disappointment in the municipality’s way of doing things. The issue then was this great gap between the municipal government and the hopes of the residents.
- 3.
- 4.
Based on the findings at Rikuzentakata City, Kamaishi City, and Otsuchi Town, where the author is involved in the reconstruction process.
- 5.
See http://rtmachikyodo.jimdo.com (in Japanese; accessed December 2016)
- 6.
Furusatozukuri Kyoudou Suishin Gigyou Hojyokin, currently named Community Katsudou Suishin Jyoseikin, see the link http://www.town.otsuchi.iwate.jp/gyosei/docs/2014112500042 (Japanese) and https://translate.google.es/translate?hl=en&sl=ja&u=http://www.town.otsuchi.iwate.jp/gyosei/docs/2014112500042/&prev=searchaccessed (English) December 2016.
- 7.
Reconstruction Agency of Japan.
http://www.reconstruction.go.jp/topics/main-cat1/sub-cat1-11/20131003170713.html and http://www.reconstruction.go.jp/english/) Accessed December 2016.
- 8.
Japan Care Service Corporation. http://www.japan-care.com Accessed December 2016
References
Furusatozukuri Kyoudou Suishin Gigyou Hojyokin (2016) Currently named Community Katsudou Suishin Jyoseikin, http://www.town.otsuchi.iwate.jp/gyosei/docs/2014112500042 (Japanese) and https://translate.google.es/translate?hl=en&sl=ja&u=http://www.town.otsuchi.iwate.jp/gyosei/docs/2014112500042/&prev=searchaccessed (English) Dec 2016
Hideki K (2012a) Redesigning communities in areas damaged by the Great East Japan Earthquake: toward community-based reconstruction. Plan Public Manag 35(2):29–32
Hideki K (2012b) Redesigning planning through experience of reconstruction planning and disaster prevention planning. City Plan Rev 61(5):37–41, 2012-10-25
Japan Care Service Corporation. http://www.japan-care.com. Accessed Dec 2016 (in Japanese)
Reconstruction Agency of Japan (2016) Efforts for reconstruction of Tohoku (2016) http://www.reconstruction.go.jp/topics/main-cat1/sub-cat1-11/20131003170713.html (Japanese and http://www.reconstruction.go.jp/english/. Accessed Dec 2016
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Koizumi, H., Tsuji, M. (2018). Community Design in the Recovery Following the March 2011 Earthquake and Tsunami. In: Santiago-Fandiño, V., Sato, S., Maki, N., Iuchi, K. (eds) The 2011 Japan Earthquake and Tsunami: Reconstruction and Restoration. Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research, vol 47. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58691-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58691-5_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58690-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-58691-5
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)