The Use of Neurometric and Biometric Research Methods in Understanding the User Experience During Product Search of First-Time Buyers in E-Commerce
Understanding user experience (UX) during e-commerce has been a relatively important research area especially in the last decade. The use of conventional methods in UX such as task-observation, in-depth interviews and questionnaires has already contributed for the measurement of the efficiency and effectiveness. This empirical study has aimed to make use of both conventional and neuroscientific methods simultaneously to provide a richer analysis framework for understanding the product search experience of the first-time buyers. The current work provides insights for the results from the combined use of conventional and neuroscientific-biometric methods in a UX study. Although this has been an exploratory study within a limited literature, the obtained results indicate a potential use of these methods for UX research, which may contribute to improve the relevant experience in various digital platforms.
KeywordsUser experience (UX) E-commerce Product search Decision making Traditional user research methods Neuroscientific methods Neuroergonomics
This work was financially supported by gittigidiyor (eBay). We’d like to thank for the efforts and support of Çağrı Karahan and Oğuzhan Poyrazoğlu in the realization of this study.
- ISO DIS, I. 9241-210: 2010. Ergonomics of human system interaction-Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems. International Standardization Organization (ISO), Switzerland (2009)Google Scholar
- Drenner, S., Sen, S., Terveen, L.: Crafting the initial user experience to achieve community goals. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pp. 187–194. ACM, October 2008Google Scholar
- Law, E.L.C., Roto, V., Hassenzahl, M., Vermeeren, A.P., Kort, J.: Understanding, scoping and defining user experience: a survey approach. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 719–728. ACM, April 2009Google Scholar
- Boehner, K., DePaula, R., Dourish, P., Sengers, P.: Affect: from information to interaction. In: Proceedings of the 4th Decennial Conference on Critical Computing: Between Sense and Sensibility, pp. 59–68. ACM, August 2005Google Scholar
- Davidson, R.J., Schwartz, G.E., Saron, C., Bennett, J., Goleman, D.: Frontal versus parietal EEG asymmetry during positive and negative affect. Psychophysiology 16, 202–203 (1979)Google Scholar
- Tomico, O., Mizutani, N., Levy, P., Yokoi, T., Cho, Y., Yamanaka, T.: Kansei physiological measurements and constructivist psychological explorations for approaching user subjective experience. In: DS 48: Proceedings of the 10th International Design Conference, DESIGN 2008, Dubrovnik, Croatia (2008)Google Scholar
- Boucsein, W.: Electrodermal Activity, p. 2. Springer Science & Business Media, New York (2012)Google Scholar
- Westerink, J.H., Van Den Broek, E.L., Schut, M.H., Van Herk, J., Tuinenbreijer, K.: Computing emotion awareness through galvanic skin response and facial electromyography. In: Westerink, J.H.D.M., Ouwerkerk, M., Overbeek, T.J.M., Frank Pasveer, W., de Ruyter, B. (eds.) Probing Experience. Philips Research, vol. 8, pp. 149–162. Springer, Netherlands (2008)Google Scholar
- Carlson, N.R.: Physiology of Behavior. Pearson, Boston (2013)Google Scholar
- Holst, C.: Consider ‘Promoting’ Important Product Filters (80% Don’t), 5 April 2016. http://baymard.com/blog/promoting-product-filters. Accessed
- Appleseed, J.: 8 Design Patterns for Autocomplete Suggestions, 1 July 2014. http://baymard.com/blog/autocomplete-design. Accessed