Studies have shown the potential of co-producing public services with the stakeholders for more efficient and sustainable smart city services. However, evidence-based records of the success of such initiatives are limited and there is a strong deficit of analysis of what makes co-production efficient. This study addresses these limitations by exploring the methods, tools and techniques for managing the process effectively, and the skills required to do so, drawing on both literature and empirical data. A case study method and survey is employed to uncover specific factors and challenges operating among public service project managers in European smart cities—based on experience gained from Peripheria, a multidisciplinary project focused on the co-production of Future Internet-enabled services. Six pilot cases are explored to understand how each of them set about engaging their stakeholders in service co-production in order to reach the desired services and impacts for their smart city. A clear pattern emerged from the results of the comparative analysis, showing that, for the most part, there is no one-size-fits-all that can be applied to the cities’ attempts to engage their stakeholders in efficient service co-production. The evidence collected also suggests that public service managers need not only the tools and techniques to encourage collaboration between the multiplicity of stakeholders involved in co-production but also the skills and capacity for managing the governance of co-production. It is these twin messages about no ‘one-size-fits-all’ and the importance of context-specific governance issues about who takes part in decision-making—that need to be carried forward from this study.
- Smart city
- Public services
- Tools and techniques
Part of this work was presented at the R&D Management Conference: From Science to Society: Innovation and Value Creation, Cambridge University, UK, 3–6 July 2016: Paskaleva, K. Cooper, I and Concilo, G. 2016. Tools and techniques for co-producing smart city services: Does one size fit all?”
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Alford, J. (2009). Engaging public sector clients: From service-delivery to co-production. Palgrave Macmillan.
Boyle, B., & Harris, M. (2012). The challenge of co-production: How equal partnerships between professionals and the public are crucial to improving public services. (NESTA report). Retrieved from http://www.nesta.org.uk/sites/default/files/the_challenge_of_co-roduction.pdf
Brudney, J., & England, R. (1983). Toward a definition of the coproduction concept. Public Administration Review, 43(1), 59–65.
Bergvall-Kaareborn, B., Howcroft, D., Ståhlbröst, A., & Wikman, A. M. (2010). Participation in living lab: Designing systems with users. In Design science research (pp. 317–326). Springer.
Cahn, E., & Gray, C. (2013). Co-production from a normative perspective. In New public governance, the third sector, and co-production (vol. 7, p. 129).
Cohen, B. (2016). The emergence of the urban entrepreneur: How the growth of cities and the sharing economy are driving a new breed of innovators. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
ENoLL. (2010). European conference on ‘smart cities’ as centres for user-driven open innovation. Retrieved from http://www.openlivinglabs.eu/news/%E2%80%98smart-cities%E2%80%99-centres-user-driven-open-innovation
European Commission. (2008). The Future of Internet: A compendium of European projects on ICT research supported by the EU 7th framework programme for RTD. Retrieved from ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/fp7/ict/docs/ch1-g848-280-future-internet_en.pdf
European Commission. (2011). Innovation in public administration. Innobarometer 2010: Analytical Report. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/flash/fl_305_en.pdf
Gil-Garcia, R., Helbig, N., & Ojo, A. (2014). Being smart: Emerging technologies and innovation in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 1(I8), 11–28.
Gottfridsson, P. (2012). Joint service development—The creations of the prerequisite for the service development. Managing Service Quality, 22(1), 21–37.
Hernández-Muñoz, J. M., Vercher, J. B., Muñoz, L., Galache, J. A., Presser, M., Gómez, L. A. H. et al. (2011). Smart cities at the forefront of the future internet. In The Future Internet (pp. 447–462). Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
Kujala, S. (2003). User involvement: A review of the benefits and challenges. Behaviour & Information Technology, 22(1), 1–16.
Levén, P., & Holmström, J. (2008). Consumer co-creation and the ecology of innovation: A living lab approach. In V. Asproth (Ed.), Public systems in the future: Possibilities, challenges and pitfalls. Åre, Sweden.
Meijer, A., & Bolívar, R. (2015). Governing the smart city: A review of the literature on smart urban governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(2), 1–17.
Naphade, M., Banavar, G., Harrison, C., & Paraszczak, J. (2011). Smarter cities and their innovation challenges. Computer, 44(6), 32–39.
OECD. (2012). Innovation in public services: Context, solutions and challenges. OECD, Paris. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/innovating-the-public-sector/Background-report.pdf
OECD. (2014). Innovating the public sector: From ideas to impact. OECD Conference Centre, Paris. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/innovating-the-public-sector/Background-report.pdf
OECD. (2011). Together for better public services: Partnering with citizens and civil society. http://www.oecd.org/gov/togetherforbetterpublicservicespartneringwithcitizensandcivilsociety.htm
Osborne, S., and L. Brown. (2013). Introduction: innovation in public services. In S. Osborne & L. Brown (Eds.), Handbook of Innovation in Public Services (pp. 165–172). Edward Elgar.
Osborne, S., Radnor, Z., Vidal, I., & Kinder, T. (2014). A sustainable business model for public service organizations? Editorial: Special Issue: Co-production and Public Services, Public Management Review, 3, 165–172.
Ostrom, E. (1996). Crossing the great divide: Co-production, synergy, and development. World Development, 24(6), 1073–1087.
Paskaleva, K., Cooper, I., Linde, P., Peterson, B. and Goetz, Ch. (2015). Smart city stakeholder engagement: making living labs work. In M. Bolívar (Ed.), Transforming city governments for successful smart cities (pp. 115–145). Springer.
Paskaleva, K. (2011). Smart cities: A nexus of open innovation? Intelligent Buildings International, 3(3), 153–171.
Paskaleva, K., & Cooper, I. (2016a). What next for innovation for public services: Management skills for co-production in the smart city services. Working paper, Manchester Institute of Innovation Research, University of Manchester.
Paskaleva, K., & Cooper, I. (2016b). Open innovation evaluation for internet-enabled services in smart cities. Paper considered for publication in Technovation, under first revision.
Pestoff, V. (2012). Co-production and third sector social services in Europe—Some crucial conceptual issues. In T. Pestoff & B. Verschuere (Eds.), New public governance, the third sector and co-production. London: Routledge.
Peripheria. (n.d.). The Project. http://humansmartcities.eu/project/peripheria. Peripheria Newsletter #2, August 2012.
Pollitt, C., Geert, B., & Löffler, E. (2006). Making quality sustainable: Co-design, co-decide, co-produce, co-evaluate. Report of the 4QC Conference, Tempere, 1–22.
Sicilia, M., Guarini, E., Sancino, A., Andreani, M., & Ruffini, R. (2016). Public services management and co-production in multi-level governance settings. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(1), 8–27.
Schaffers, H. et al.(2012). FIREBALL White paper on smart cities as innovation ecosystems sustained by the Future Internet.
Seligman, A. 1997. The problem of trust. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Strokosch, K. (2013). Co-production and innovation in public services: Can co-production drive innovation? In S. Osborne and L. Brown (Eds.), Handbook of innovation in public services. Edgar Elgar.
Svara, J. (2013). Leading successful innovation in local public services. In S. Osborne and L. Brown (Eds.), Handbook of innovation in public services. Edward Elgar.
Vikas, J., & Shalini, K. (2011). E-government implementation challenges at local level: A comparative study of government and citizens’ perspectives. Electronic Government, 8(2), 208–225.
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Paskaleva, K., Cooper, I., Concilo, G. (2018). Co-producing Smart City Services: Does One Size Fit All?. In: Rodríguez Bolívar, M. (eds) Smart Technologies for Smart Governments. Public Administration and Information Technology, vol 24. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58577-2_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58576-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-58577-2
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)