Advertisement

A Critical Reflection on Three Paradigms in Museum Experience Design

  • Amalia Sabiescu
Chapter
Part of the Springer Series on Cultural Computing book series (SSCC)

Abstract

This chapter identifies and describes three technological paradigms in museum experience design, all positioned within an overarching visitor-centredness frame: (1) User-centred experience design, which emphasises modelling experience design in response to visitor views and interests, through methods adapted from or inspired by user-centred approaches in Human–Computer Interaction; (2) Participatory experience design, which shifts the emphasis from the product to the process of design and invites the visitor to become partner in the design of experiences; and (3) Agile experience design, in which the main preoccupation is with being constantly responsive to evolving visitor aims and needs, and innovating the experiential offer on an ongoing basis. In the context of museum experience design, each of these paradigms represents a systematic way of delivering value to the public through meaningfully designed experiences. The chapter contributes a critical reflection on the importance of acknowledging the existence and endorsement of these paradigms, which can impact museum practice beyond single design projects. In particular, I will discuss to what extent working within a certain paradigm can be transformative for the way museums function, how they are organised and how they engage with their public.

References

  1. Bannon L (1986) From human factors to human actors: the role of psychology and human-computer interaction studies in system design. In: Greenbaum J, Kyng M (eds) Design at work: cooperative design of computer systems. Erlbaum, pp 25–44Google Scholar
  2. Bødker S (2006) When second wave HCI meets third wave challenges. In: Proceedings of the 4th nordic conference on human-computer interaction: changing roles. ACM, New York, pp 1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1145/1182475.1182476
  3. Dogan M (2001) Smelser NJ, Baltes B (eds) International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences. pp 16–11023Google Scholar
  4. Ellis D et al (2008) Agile methods for project management. In: Trant J, Bearman D (eds) Museums and the web 2008: proceedings, Toronto: archives and museum informatics. Published March 31, 2008. Consulted January 19, 2017. http://www.archimuse.com/mw2008/papers/jenkins/jenkins.html
  5. Falk JH, Dierking LD (2013) The museum experience revisited. RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Gronbaek K, Grudin J, Bodker S, Bannon L (1993) Achieving cooperative system design: shifting from a product to a process focus. Schuler D, Namioka A (eds) Participatory design: principles and practices. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 79–97Google Scholar
  7. Hall T, Bannon L (2005) Co-operative design of children’sinteraction in museums: a case studyin the Hunt Museum. CoDesign 1(3):187–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Handa ML (1986) Peace paradigm: transcending liberal and marxian paradigms paper presented in international symposium on science, technology and development, New Delhi, India, March 20–25, 1987, Mimeographed at O.I.S.E., University of Toronto, Canada (1986)Google Scholar
  9. Harrison S, Tatar D, Sengers P (2007) The three paradigms of HCI. In: Alt. Chi. Session at the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems San Jose, California, USAGoogle Scholar
  10. Hegley D, Tongen M, David A (2016) The Agile museum. In: MW2016: Museums and the web 2016. Published January 15, 2016. Consulted January 19, 2017. http://mw2016.museumsandtheweb.com/paper/the-agile-museum/
  11. Hooper-Greenhill E (1994) Education, communication and interpretation: towards a critical pedagogy in museums. In: Hooper-Greenhill (ed.) The educational role of the museum. 2nd edn. Routledge, London, pp 3–27Google Scholar
  12. Kuhn T (1977) The essential tension: selected studies in scientific tradition and changeGoogle Scholar
  13. Kuhn T (1996) The structure of scientific revolutions, 3d edn. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. (1st ed., 1962)Google Scholar
  14. Laudan L (1977) Progress and Its problems: towards a theory of scientific growth. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  15. Mannion S, Sabiescu A, Robinson W (2015) An audio state of mind: understanding behaviour around audio guides and visitor media. In: MW2015: museums and the web 2015. Published February 1, 2015. Consulted December 19, 2016. http://mw2015.museumsandtheweb.com/paper/an-audio-state-of-mind-understanding-behviour-around-audio-guides-and-visitor-media/
  16. Muller MJ (2003) Participatory design: the third space in HCI. Hum Comput Interaction Dev Process 4235:165–185Google Scholar
  17. Muller MJ, Wildman DM, White EA (1993) Taxonomy of PD practices: a brief practitioner’s guide. Commun ACM 36(6):26–28Google Scholar
  18. Nonaka I, Konno N (1998) The concept of “ba”: Building a foundation for knowledge creation. Calif Manag Rev 40(3):40–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sabiescu AG, David S, van Zyl I, Cantoni L (2014) Emerging spaces in community-based participatory design: reflections from two case studies. In: Proceedings of the 13th participatory design conference: research papers, vol 1. ACM, New York, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  20. Sabiescu A, Charatzopoulou K (2015) Shaping a culture of lifelong learning for young audiences: a case study on the samsung digital discovery centre at the British museum. RICHES EU project deliverableGoogle Scholar
  21. Samis P, Michaelson M (2017) The visitor-centred museum. Routledge, New York and LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Schwaber K (1997) Scrum development process. In: Business object design and implementation. Springer London, pp 117–134Google Scholar
  23. Simon N (2010) The participatory museum. Museum 2.0Google Scholar
  24. Simon N (2016) The art of relevance. Museum 2.0, Santa Cruz, CAGoogle Scholar
  25. Suchman L (1993) Foreword. In: Schuler D, Namioka A (eds) Participatory design: principles and practices. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp vii–ixGoogle Scholar
  26. Sutherland J (2001) Inventing and reinventing SCRUM in five companies. sur le site officiel de l’alliance agileGoogle Scholar
  27. Sutherland J, Viktorov A, Blount J, Puntikov N (2007) Distributed scrum: Agile project management with outsourced development teams. In: 40th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, 2007. HICSS 2007. IEEE, Waikoloa, 274a pGoogle Scholar
  28. Takeuchi H, Nonaka I (1986) The new product development game. Harvard Business ReviewGoogle Scholar
  29. Taxén G (2004) Introducing participatory design in museums. In: Proceedings of the eighth conference on Participatory design: artful integration: interweaving media, materials and practices, vol 1. ACM, New York, pp 204–213Google Scholar
  30. Taxén G (2005) Participatory design in museums. Visitor-oriented perspectives on exhibition design. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  31. Watkins J (2007) Social media, participatory design and cultural engagement. In: Proceedings of the 19th Australasian conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Entertaining User Interfaces. ACM, New York, pp 161–166Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Loughborough University LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations