Advertisement

Adaptation of the Model for Assessment of Telemedicine (MAST) for IoT Telemedicine Services

  • George E. Dafoulas
  • Georgios Pierris
  • Santiago Martinez
  • Lise Kvistgaard Jensen
  • Kristian Kidholm
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10298)

Abstract

Internet of Things (IoT) based solutions and services may be used to support and extend the independent living of older adults in their living environments by responding to real needs of caregivers, service providers and public authorities. Telemedicine and telehealth platforms are among the various types of IoT services that could support the provision of health services. Current Health Technology Assessment (HTA) models that are used for the evaluation of telehealth and telemedicine services do not consider IoT aspects. HTA models would ideally need to be extended to include IoT platforms, for an optimal introduction of IoT in everyday provision of health and care services. This paper presents an initial adaptation of the Model for Assessment of Telemedicine (MAST) for IoT Telemedicine services based on a literature review of IoT, telemedicine and telehealth services characteristics. MAST involves assessment of outcomes within the following seven domains: Health problem and characteristics of the application, Safety, Clinical effectiveness, Patient perspectives, Economic aspects, Organizational aspects, Socio-cultural, ethical and legal aspects. The domains of the characteristics of the application, socio-cultural, safety and ethical and legal aspects were identified as those to be adapted to cover new challenges associated to IoT services.

Keywords

Internet of Things Telemedicine Health Technology Assessment 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper is part of the ACTIVAGE project that has received funding from the European Unions Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No 732679.

References

  1. 1.
    European Commission: The 2015 ageing report, underlying assumptions and projection, methodologies, Joint Report prepared by the European Commission (DG ECFIN) and the Economic Policy Committee (AWG). European Commission, Brussels (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Commission of the European Communities, COM: 245 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, A Digital Agenda for Europe. European Commission, Brussels (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Commission of the European Communities, COM: 689 communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on telemedicine for the benefit of patients, healthcare systems and society. European Commission, Brussels (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    European Commission: Public Health, Health Technology Assessment (2017). https://ec.europa.eu/health/technology_assessment/policy_en. Accessed 10 Feb 2017
  5. 5.
    Minerva, R., Biru, A., Rotondi, D.: Towards a definition of the Internet of Things (IoT). IEEE Internet Initiative. Telecom Italia, Torino (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    WHO: Health technology assessment of medical devices, WHO Medical device technical series. WHO Press, Geneva (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kidholm, K., Ekeland, A.G., Jensen, L.K., Rasmussen, J., Pedersen, C.D., Bowes, A., Flottorp, S.A., Bech, M.: A model for assessment of telemedicine applications: MAST. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care 28(1), 44–51 (2012). doi: 10.1017/S0266462311000638 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Empirica: ASSIST - Assessment and evaluation tools for telemedicine and telehealth (2012). http://assist.empirica.biz. Accessed 7 Nov 2016
  9. 9.
    ITU-T: Overview of the Internet of Things, ITU-T Y.4000/Y.2060 (2012). http://handle.itu.int/11.1002/1000/11559. Accessed 2 Jan 2017
  10. 10.
    Atzori, L., Iera, A., Morabito, G.: The internet of things: A survey. Comput. Netw. 54, 2787–2805 (2010). doi: 10.1016/j.comnet.2010.05.010 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ashok, K., Prattep, M.: White Paper: The internet of Things for Medical Devices-Prospects, Challenges and the way forward, TCS’ Life Sciences Business Unit (2014). http://www.tcs.com/resources/white_papers/Pages/Internet-of-Things-Medical-Devices.aspx. Accessed 2 Jan 2017
  12. 12.
    Working Party on the Protection of Individuals with regard to the processing of personal data. 14/EN WP 223 Opinion 8/2014 on the on Recent Developments on the Internet of Things. European Commission, Brussels (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kidholm, K., Jensen, L.K., Kjølhede, T., Nielsen, E., Horup, M.B.: Validity of the model for assessment of telemedicine: A delphi study. J. Telemed. Telecare (2016). doi: 10.1177/1357633X16686553 Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    European Commission, Joint Research Centre. MAFEIP (2009). http://is.jrc.ec.europa.eu/pages/TFS/MAFEIP.html. Accessed 2 Jan 2017

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • George E. Dafoulas
    • 1
  • Georgios Pierris
    • 2
  • Santiago Martinez
    • 3
  • Lise Kvistgaard Jensen
    • 4
  • Kristian Kidholm
    • 4
  1. 1.Faculty of MedicineUniversity of ThessalyLarisaGreece
  2. 2.National Centre for Scientific Research ‘Demokritos’AthensGreece
  3. 3.Faculty of Health and Sport SciencesUniversity of AgderGrimstadNorway
  4. 4.Center for Innovative Medical TechnologyOdense University HospitalOdenseDenmark

Personalised recommendations