Advertisement

Metal Allergy pp 397-421 | Cite as

Metal Allergy: Mercury

  • Gianpaolo Guzzi
  • Paolo D. Pigatto
Chapter

Abstract

Mercury allergy is a clinically relevant condition because it underlies both oral and/or systemic disease caused by a type IV hypersensitivity. Humans are exposed to mercury from mercury-containing dental amalgam filling, fish consumption, and vaccines. There are no safe levels of mercury exposure in humans, and hypersensitivity to mercury, the patient’s clinical condition, and the severity of disease are not related to the dose. Skin patch testing and lymphocyte transformation testing (LTT) are useful to confirm or rule out the presence of mercury hypersensitivity. Avoidance of elemental and inorganic mercury (mercury-based dental amalgam) and organic mercury (fish and seafood) is the first-line treatment for allergy to mercury.

References

  1. 1.
    Guzzi G, Ronchi A, Barbaro M, Soldarini A, Pigatto P. Levels of mercury in patient with mercury dental amalgam. Toxicol Lett. 2016;258(Suppl):1.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Clarkson TW. The three modern faces of mercury. Environ Health Perspect. 2002;110(Suppl 1):11–23.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clarkson TW, Magos L, Myers GJ. The toxicology of mercury--current exposures and clinical manifestations. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(18):1731–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Guzzi G, La Porta CA. Molecular mechanisms triggered by mercury. Toxicology. 2008;244(1):1–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goyer RA, Clarkson TW. Toxic effects of metals. In:Klaassen CD Casarett & Doull’s toxicology: the basic science of poisons. 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Medical Pub. Division; 2001. p. 811–67.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goldwater LJ. Mercury: a history of quicksilver. Baltimore: York Press; 1972. 318 p.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lorscheider FL, Vimy MJ, Summers AO. Mercury exposure from “silver” tooth fillings: emerging evidence questions a traditional dental paradigm. FASEB J. 1995;9(7):504–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Thyssen JP, Linneberg A, Menne T, Nielsen NH, Johansen JD. Contact allergy to allergens of the TRUE-test (panels 1 and 2) has decreased modestly in the general population. Br J Dermatol. 2009;161(5):1124–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    WHO. Inorganic mercury. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1991. p. 168.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pigatto PD, Minoia C, Ronchi A, Brambilla L, Ferrucci SM, Spadari F, et al. Allergological and toxicological aspects in a multiple chemical sensitivity cohort. Oxidative Med Cell Longev. 2013;2013:356235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guzzi G, Minoia C, Pigatto PD, Severi G. Methylmercury, amalgams, and children’s health. Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114(3):A149.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pigatto P, Ronchi A, Bazzigaluppi E, Soldarini A, Barbaro M, Guzzi G. Laboratory features in patients with adverse events to mercury-containing dental amalgam. Toxicol Lett. 2016;258(Suppl):1.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hamann CR, Boonchai W, Wen L, Sakanashi EN, Chu CY, Hamann K, et al. Spectrometric analysis of mercury content in 549 skin-lightening products: is mercury toxicity a hidden global health hazard? J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;70(2):281–7e3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Barr RD, Rees PH, Cordy PE, Kungu A, Woodger BA, Cameron HM. Nephrotic syndrome in adult Africans in Nairobi. Br Med J. 1972;2(5806):131–4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pigatto P, Spadari F, Bombeccari G, Bolengo I, Brambilla L, Ferrucci S, et al. Diseases related to mercury amalgam fillings. Toxicol Lett. 2015;238(2 Supplement):2.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pigatto PD, Brambilla L, Ferrucci S, Minoia C, Ronchi A, Guzzi G. Allergy and adverse reactions to dental amalgam: an epidemiological assessment. Contact Dermatitis. 2010;63(Suppl. s1):95.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pigatto P, Minoia C, Ferrucci S, Ronchi A, Brambilla L, Guzzi G. Prevalence of mercury allergy and treatment of adverse events to dental materials. Allergy. 2013;68(Suppl. 97):2.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Laine J, Konttinen YT, Beliaev N, Happonen RP. Immunocompetent cells in amalgam-associated oral lichenoid contact lesions. J Oral Pathol Med. 1999;28(3):117–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pigatto PD, Guzzi G. Oral lichenoid lesions: more than mercury. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005;100(4):398–400.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pigatto PD, Guzzi G. Linking mercury amalgam to autoimmunity. Trends Immunol. 2010;31(2):48–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pigatto PD, Guzzi G. Burning mouth syndrome. Skinmed. 2012;10(3):134–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pigatto PD, Guzzi G, Persichini P, Barbadillo S. Recovery from mercury-induced burning mouth syndrome due to mercury allergy. Dermatitis. 2004;15(2):75–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Khamaysi Z, Bergman R, Weltfriend S. Positive patch test reactions to allergens of the dental series and the relation to the clinical presentations. Contact Dermatitis. 2006;55(4):216–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pigatto PD, Guzzi G. The link between patch testing and dental materials. Contact Dermatitis. 2007;56(5):301.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Albert D, Clarkin C, Komoroski J, Brensinger CM, Berlin JA. Wegener’s granulomatosis: possible role of environmental agents in its pathogenesis. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;51(4):656–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Boyd AS, Seger D, Vannucci S, Langley M, Abraham JL, King LE Jr. Mercury exposure and cutaneous disease. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000;43(1 Pt 1):81–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mutter J, Yeter D. Kawasaki’s disease, acrodynia, and mercury. Curr Med Chem. 2008;15(28):3000–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Al-Sinani S, Al-Rawas A, Dhawan A. Mercury as a cause of fulminant hepatic failure in a child: case report and literature review. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2011;35(8-9):580–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kawasaki T, Kosaki F, Okawa S, Shigematsu I, Yanagawa H. A new infantile acute febrile mucocutaneous lymph node syndrome (MLNS) prevailing in Japan. Pediatrics. 1974;54(3):271–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kazantzis G. Mercury exposure and early effects: an overview. Med Lav. 2002;93(3):139–47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Adler R, Boxstein D, Schaff P, Kelly D. Metallic mercury vapor poisoning simulating mucocutaneous lymph node syndrome. J Pediatr. 1982;101(6):967–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sala F, Crosti C, Bencini PL, Perrotta E, Andreani B, Greppi E. Erythema multiforme-like exanthema caused by mercury-containing skin cream. Chron Dermatol. 1987;18:7.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Yeter D, Portman MA, Aschner M, Farina M, Chan WC, Hsieh KS, et al. Ethnic kawasaki disease risk associated with blood mercury and cadmium in U.S. children. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13(1) doi: 10.3390/ijerph13010101.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Orlowski JP, Mercer RD. Urine mercury levels in Kawasaki disease. Pediatrics. 1980;66(4):633–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Guallar E, Sanz-Gallardo MI, van't Veer P, Bode P, Aro A, Gomez-Aracena J, et al. Mercury, fish oils, and the risk of myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(22):1747–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Frustaci A, Magnavita N, Chimenti C, Caldarulo M, Sabbioni E, Pietra R, et al. Marked elevation of myocardial trace elements in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy compared with secondary cardiac dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33(6):1578–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Manousek J, Stejskal V, Kubena P, Jarkovsky J, Nemec P, Lokaj P, et al. Delayed-type hypersensitivity to metals of environmental burden in patients with takotsubo syndrome - is there a clinical relevance? PLoS One. 2016;11(11):e0164786.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Cook J, Metcalf J. Images in clinical medicine. Tattoo allergy. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(1):e1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Pigatto P, Guzzi G. Allergy to metals and skin diseases. Annali di Dermatologia. 2012;66:9.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kluger N, Cohen-Valensi R, Nezri M. Black lymph nodes--and a colourful skin. Lancet. 2008;371(9619):1214.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Benz EB, Sherburne B, Hayek JE, Falchuk KH, Sledge CB, Spector M. Lymphadenopathy associated with total joint prostheses. A report of two cases and a review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78(4):588–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Goitre M, Bedello PG, Cane D. Chromium dermatitis and oral administration of the metal. Contact Dermatitis. 1982;8(3):208–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Jaehn T, Kaiser A, Gruneis C, Saalabian AA, Reichert B. Pseudolymphatic allergic immune reaction after tattooing. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2014;46(6):379–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Taaffe A, Knight AG, Marks R. Lichenoid tattoo hypersensitivity. Br Med J. 1978;1(6113):616–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sowden JM, Byrne JP, Smith AG, Hiley C, Suarez V, Wagner B, et al. Red tattoo reactions: X-ray microanalysis and patch-test studies. Br J Dermatol. 1991;124(6):576–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Pigatto PD, Guzzi G. Thimerosal: An allergen for patch testing. Clin Chim Acta. 2017;468:230.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Belsito DV. Thimerosal: contact (non)allergen of the year. Am J Contact Dermat. 2002;13(1):1–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Nakada T, Higo N, Iijima M, Nakayama H, Maibach HI. Patch test materials for mercury allergic contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 1997;36(5):237–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Pigatto PD, Guzzi G. Allergy to gold: the two faces of mercury. Ann Dermatol. 2017;29(1):105.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Osawa J, Kitamura K, Ikezawa Z, Hariya T, Nakajima H. Gold dermatitis due to ear piercing: correlations between gold and mercury hypersensitivities. Contact Dermatitis. 1994;31(2):89–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    de la Cuadra J. Cutaneous sensitivity to mercury and its compounds. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 1993;120(1):37–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Goncalo M, Figueiredo A, Goncalo S. Hypersensitivity to thimerosal: the sensitizing moiety. Contact Dermatitis. 1996;34(3):201–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Kitamura K, Osawa J, Ikezawa Z, Nakajima H. Cross-reactivity between sensitivity to thimerosal and photosensitivity to piroxicam in guinea pigs. Contact Dermatitis. 1991;25(1):30–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    de Castro JL, Freitas JP, Brandao FM, Themido R. Sensitivity to thimerosal and photosensitivity to piroxicam. Contact Dermatitis. 1991;24(3):187–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Pigatto PD, Meroni L. Risks of dental amalgam in children. JAMA. 2006;296(12):1461.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Guzzi G, Minoia C, Pigatto P, Ronchi A, Gatti A, Angeleri S, et al. Safe dental amalgam removal in patients with immuno-toxic reactions to mercury. Toxicol Lett. 2003;144(suppl. 1):2.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Guzzi G, Mazzi B, Tomasi S, Fleischhauer K, Pigatto P. Association between HLA-class II and mercury sensitization. RMZ-Mater Geoenviron. 2004;51(1):420–3.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Prochazkova J, Bartova J, Ivaskova E, Kupkova L, Sterzl I, Stejskal VD. HLA-association in patients with intolerance to mercury and other metals in dental materials. Dis Markers. 2000;16(3-4):135–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Pigatto PD, Mazzi B, Fleischhauer K, Guzzi G. Linking allergy to mercury to HLA and burning mouth syndrome. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2007;21(8):1118–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Westphal GA, Schnuch A, Schulz TG, Reich K, Aberer W, Brasch J, et al. Homozygous gene deletions of the glutathione S-transferases M1 and T1 are associated with thimerosal sensitization. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2000;73(6):384–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Cesarani A, Minoia C, Pigatto PD, Guzzi G. Mercury, dental amalgam, and hearing loss. Int J Audiol. 2010;49(1):69–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Guzzi G, Ronchi A, Gatti A, Angeleri S, Formichi O, Minoia C. Lift-on technique: a new approach for dental amalgam removal. RMZ-Mater Geoenviron. 2004;51(1):417–9.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Pigatto P, Brambilla L, Ferrucci S, Guzzi G. Anaphylactic shock during mercury dental amalgam removal. Contact Dermatitis. 2010;63(Suppl. s1):91.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Pigatto PD, Ronchi A, Brambilla L, Ferrucci S, Passoni M, Rossi V, et al. Dietary factors, allergy and exposure to mercury. Contact Dermatitis. 2014;70(Suppl. 1):1.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Kanerva L, Estlander T, Alanko K, Jolanki R. Patch test sensitization to Compositae mix, sesquiterpene-lactone mix, compositae extracts, laurel leaf, chlorophorin, mansonone a, and dimethoxydalbergione. Am J Contact Dermat. 2001;12(1):18–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Eversole LR, Ringer M. The role of dental restorative metals in the pathogenesis of oral lichen planus. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1984;57(4):383–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Finne K, Goransson K, Winckler L. Oral lichen planus and contact allergy to mercury. Int J Oral Surg. 1982;11(4):236–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    James J, Ferguson MM, Forsyth A, Tulloch N, Lamey PJ. Oral lichenoid reactions related to mercury sensitivity. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1987;25(6):474–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Lundstrom IM. Allergy and corrosion of dental materials in patients with oral lichen planus. Int J Oral Surg. 1984;13(1):16–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Mobacken H, Hersle K, Sloberg K, Thilander H. Oral lichen planus: hypersensitivity to dental restoration material. Contact Dermatitis. 1984;10(1):11–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Djerassi E, Berova N. The possibilities of allergic reactions from silver amalgam restorations. Int Dent J. 1969;19(4):481–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Magnusson B, Blohm SG, Fregert S, Hjorth N, Hovding G, Pirila V, et al. Routine patch testing. IV. Supplementary series of test substances for Scandinavian countries. Acta Derm Venereol. 1968;48(2):110–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Axell T. Hypersensitivity of the oral mucosa: clinics and pathology. Acta Odontol Scand. 2001;59(5):315–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Skoglund A. Value of epicutaneous patch testing in patients with oral, mucosal lesions of lichenoid character. Scand J Dent Res. 1994;102(4):216–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Guzzi G, Fogazzi GB, Cantu M, Minoia C, Ronchi A, Pigatto PD, et al. Dental amalgam, mercury toxicity, and renal autoimmunity. J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol. 2008;27(2):147–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Colombo G, Yacoub MR, Guzzi G, Pigatto P, Sabbadini MG. Type III hypersensitivity reaction to mercury contained in mercury amalgam tooth fillings. National Congress of Italian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (SIAAIC); Florence (Italy); 2008.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Pigatto PD, Minoia C, Brambilla L, Ferrucci S, Guzzi G. Auto-antibodies to nuclear and nucleolar antigen and long-term exposure to inorganic mercury. Environ Res. 2010;110(8):821.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Stejskal V, Reynolds T, Bjorklund G. Increased frequency of delayed type hypersensitivity to metals in patients with connective tissue disease. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2015;31:230–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    White IR, Smith BG. Dental amalgam dermatitis. Br Dent J. 1984;156(7):259–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Wright FA. Allergic reaction to mercury after dental treatment. N Z Dent J. 1971;67(310):251–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Audicana M, Bernedo N, Gonzalez I, Munoz D, Fernandez E, Gastaminza G. An unusual case of baboon syndrome due to mercury present in a homeopathic medicine. Contact Dermatitis. 2001;45(3):185.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Kuenzli S, Grimaitre M, Krischer J, Saurat JH, Calza AM, Borradori L. Childhood bullous pemphigoid: report of a case with life-threatening course during homeopathy treatment. Pediatr Dermatol. 2004;21(2):160–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Saper RB, Kales SN, Paquin J, Burns MJ, Eisenberg DM, Davis RB, et al. Heavy metal content of ayurvedic herbal medicine products. JAMA. 2004;292(23):2868–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Pollard KM, Hultman P. Skin-lightening creams are a possible exposure risk for systemic lupus erythematosus: comment on the article by Finckh et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56(5):1721.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Tsuruta D, Sowa J, Higashi N, Kobayashi H, Ishii M. A red tattoo and a swordfish supper. Lancet. 2004;364(9435):730.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Camilot D, Arnez ZM, Luzar B, Pizem J, Zgavec B, Falconieri G. Cutaneous pseudolymphoma following tattoo application: report of two new cases of a potential lymphoma mimicker. Int J Surg Pathol. 2012;20(3):311–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Marchesi A, Parodi PC, Brioschi M, Marchesi M, Bruni B, Cangi MG, et al. Tattoo ink-related cutaneous pseudolymphoma: a rare but significant complication. Case report and review of the literature. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2014;38(2):471–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Haus G, Utikal J, Geraud C, Goerdt S, Leverkus M. CD30-positive lymphoproliferative disorder in a red tattoo: regional lymphomatoid papulosis type C or pseudolymphoma? Br J Dermatol. 2014;171(3):668–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Godinho MM, Aguinaga F, Grynszpan R, Lima VM, Azulay DR, Cuzzi T, et al. Granulomatous reaction to red tattoo pigment treated with allopurinol. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2015;14(3):241–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Lubeck G, Epstein E. Complications of tattooing. Calif Med. 1952;76(2):83–5.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Verdich J. Granulomatous reaction in a red tattoo. Acta Derm Venereol. 1981;61(2):176–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Altmeyer MD, Burgdorf MR, Newsome RE, Wang AR. Cutaneous mercury granuloma: a case report. Cutis. 2011;88(4):189–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Bagley MP, Schwartz RA, Lambert WC. Hyperplastic reaction developing within a tattoo. Granulomatous tattoo reaction, probably to mercuric sulfide (cinnabar). Arch Dermatol. 1987;123(11):60–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Ravits HG. Allergic tattoo granuloma. Arch Dermatol. 1962;86:287–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Madden JF. Reactions in tattoos, chronic discoid lupus erythematosus. Arch Dermatol Syphilol. 1949;60(5 Pt. 1):789–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Goldstein N. Mercury-cadmium sensitivity in tattoos. A photoallergic reaction in red pigment. Ann Intern Med. 1967;67(5):984–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Kluger N, Durand L, Minier-Thoumin C, Plantier F, Cotten H, Berteloot E, et al. Pseudoepitheliomatous epidermal hyperplasia in tattoos: report of three cases. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2008;9(5):337–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Balfour E, Olhoffer I, Leffell D, Handerson T. Massive pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia: an unusual reaction to a tattoo. Am J Dermatopathol. 2003;25(4):338–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Dinehart SM, Dillard R, Raimer SS, Diven S, Cobos R, Pupo R. Cutaneous manifestations of acrodynia (pink disease). Arch Dermatol. 1988;124(1):107–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Matheson DS, Clarkson TW, Gelfand EW. Mercury toxicity (acrodynia) induced by long-term injection of gammaglobulin. J Pediatr. 1980;97(1):153–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Warkany J, Hubbard DM. Acrodynia and mercury. J Pediatr. 1953;42(3):365–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Austin DW, Spolding B, Gondalia S, Shandley K, Palombo EA, Knowles S, et al. Genetic variation associated with hypersensitivity to mercury. Toxicol Int. 2014;21(3):236–41.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Pierard GE. Toxic effects of metals from the environment on hair growth and structure. J Cutan Pathol. 1979;6(4):237–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Fernstrom AI, Frykholm KO, Huldt S. Mercury allergy with eczematous dermatitis due to silver amalgam fillings. Br Dent J. 1962;113:3.Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Ulukapi I. Mercury hypersensitivity from amalgam: report of case. ASDC J Dent Child. 1995;62(5):363–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Thomson J, Russell JA. Dermatitis due to mercury following amalgam dental restorations. Br J Dermatol. 1970;82(3):292–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Strassburg M, Schubel F. Generalized allergic reaction caused by silver amalgam fillings. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z. 1967;22(1):3–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Pigatto PD, Zerboni R, Guzzi G. Local and systemic allergic contact dermatitis due to dental alloys. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2008;22(1):124–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Spector LA. Allergic manifestation to mercury. J Am Dent Assoc. 1951;42(3):320.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Engelman MA. Mercury allergy resulting from amalgam restorations. Am Dent Ass. 1963;66:2.Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    Shovelton DS. Silver amalgam and mercury allergy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1968;25(1):29–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Traub EF, Holms RH. Dermatitis and stomatitis from the mercury of amalgam fillings. Arch Dermatol Syphilol. 1938;38(3):349–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Johnson HH, Schonberg IL, Bach NF. Chronic atopic dermatitis, with pronounced mercury sensitivity: partial clearing after extraction of teeth containing mercury amalgam fillings. AMA Arch Derm Syphilol. 1951;63(2):279–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Alanko K, Kanerva L, Jolanki R, Kannas L, Estlander T. Oral mucosal disease investigated by patch-testing with a dental screening series. Contact Dermatitis. 1996;34:5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Guzzi G, Minoia C, Pigatto P, Lucchiari S, Severi G. Mercury and dental patients: toxicology, immunology and genetic connection. Toxicol Lett. 2005;158S:1.Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    Galindo PA, Feo F, Garcia R, Gomez E, Borja J, Fernandez F. Mercurochrome allergy. Immediate and delayed hypersensitivity. Allergy. 1997;52(11):1138–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Lerch M, Bircher AJ. Systemically induced allergic exanthem from mercury. Contact Dermatitis. 2004;50(6):349–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Fernandez L, Maquiera E, Garcia-Abujeta JL, Yanez S, Rodriguez F, Martin-Gil D, et al. Baboon syndrome due to mercury sensitivity. Contact Dermatitis. 1995;33(1):56–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Le Coz CJ, Boos V, Cribier BJ, Grosshans EM, Heid E. An unusual case of mercurial baboon syndrome. Contact Dermatitis. 1996;35(2):112.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Torresani C, Caprari E, Manara GC. Contact urticaria syndrome due to phenylmercuric acetate. Contact Dermatitis. 1993;29(5):282–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Morris GE. Dermatoses from phenylmercuric salts. Arch Environ Health. 1960;1:53–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    McGivern B, Pemberton M, Theaker ED, Buchanan JA, Thornhill MH. Delayed and immediate hypersensitivity reactions associated with the use of amalgam. Br Dent J. 2000;188(2):73–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Fleischmann P. Zur Frage der Gefährlichkeit Kleinster Quecksilbermengen. Dtsch Med Wochenscher. 1928;54:4.Google Scholar
  124. 124.
    Pigatto P, Brambilla L, Guzzi G. Erysipelas-like mercury exanthema related to dental metal allergy. J Plastic Dermatol. 2011;7(3):3.Google Scholar
  125. 125.
    Grandjean P, Poulsen LK, Heilmann C, Steuerwald U, Weihe P. Allergy and sensitization during childhood associated with prenatal and lactational exposure to marine pollutants. Environ Health Perspect. 2010;118(10):1429–33.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Seidenari S, Giusti F, Pepe P, Mantovani L. Contact sensitization in 1094 children undergoing patch testing over a 7-year period. Pediatr Dermatol. 2005;22(1):1–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Feuerman EJ. Recurrent contact dermatitis caused by mercury in amalgam dental fillings. Int J Dermatol. 1975;14(9):657–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Nakayama H, Niki F, Shono M, Hada S. Mercury exanthem. Contact Dermatitis. 1983;9(5):411–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Witten VH, Grayson LD, Birnbaum VH. Studies of the mechanism of allergic eczematous contact dermatitis. I. Findings on human skin with radioactive bichloride of mercury. J Invest Dermatol. 1957;28(5):339–48.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    Gotz H, Fortmann I. Mercury skin sensitization by amalgam dental fillings. Z Haut Gechlechtskr. 1959;26(2):34–6.Google Scholar
  131. 131.
    Gaul LE, Underwood GB. Dermatitis venenata from organomercurial compounds; with a comparison of their pharmacologic action on normal and injured skin. J Am Med Assoc. 1949;140(10):860–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    Pigatto PD, Brambilla L, Ferrucci S, Zerboni R, Somalvico F, Guzzi G. Systemic allergic contact dermatitis associated with allergy to intraoral metals. Dermatol Online J. 2014;20(10):7.Google Scholar
  133. 133.
    Spreng M, Werner M. Clinical observations on dental foreign substances as allergens. Internist. 1962;3:723–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  134. 134.
    Drouet M, Le Sellin J, Bonneau JC, Sabbah A. Mercury--is it a respiratory tract allergen? Allerg Immunol (Paris). 1990;22(3):4–8.Google Scholar
  135. 135.
    Duxbury AJ, Ead RD, McMurrough S, Watts DC. Allergy to mercury in dental amalgam. Br Dent J. 1982;152(2):47–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. 136.
    Descamps V, Lejoyeux F, Marck Y, Bouscarat F, Crickx B, Belaich S. Erysipelas-like mercury exanthem. Contact Dermatitis. 1997;36(5):277–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. 137.
    Zimmer J, Grange F, Straub P, Haegy JM, Guillaume JC. Mercury erythema after accidental exposure to mercury vapor. Ann Med Interne (Paris). 1997;148(4):317–20.Google Scholar
  138. 138.
    Schnitzler L, Schubert B, Penneau D. Pustular psoriasis or mercurial erythema? Bull Soc Fr Dermatol Syphiligr. 1972;79(2):120–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  139. 139.
    Bolgert M, Levy G, Sigal S. The sign of Nikolski and transitory vesico-blisters in the course of a mercurial erythema. Bull Soc Fr Dermatol Syphiligr. 1954;61(5):498–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  140. 140.
    Jean-Pastor MJ, Jean P, Esterni JP, Frances Y, Luccioni R, Gilles G, et al. Mercury erythema. An ever-present pathology. Therapie. 1983;38(5):551–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  141. 141.
    Vena GA, Foti C, Grandolfo M, Angelini G. Mercury exanthem. Contact Dermatitis. 1994;31(4):214–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. 142.
    Pigatto P, Ferrucci S, Brambilla L, Marsili C, Guzzi G. Seroreversal of antinuclear antibodies after dental amalgam removal. Allergy. 2010;62(Suppl. 92):1.Google Scholar
  143. 143.
    Pigatto PD, Brambilla L, Guzzi G. Mercury pink exanthem after dental amalgam placement. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2008;22(3):377–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. 144.
    Pigatto PD, Feilzer AJ, Valentine-Thon E, Zerboni R, Guzzi G. Burning mouth syndrome associated with palladium allergy? Eur J Dermatol. 2008;18(3):356–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  145. 145.
    Holmstrup P. Reactions of the oral mucosa related to silver amalgam: a review. J Oral Pathol Med. 1991;20(1):1–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. 146.
    Rogers M, Goodhew P, Szafraniec T, McColl I. Mercury exanthem. Australas J Dermatol. 1986;27(2):70–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. 147.
    Schedle A, Samorapoompichit P, Fureder W, Rausch-Fan XH, Franz A, Sperr WR, et al. Metal ion-induced toxic histamine release from human basophils and mast cells. J Biomed Mater Res. 1998;39(4):560–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. 148.
    Roujeau JC, Bioulac-Sage P, Bourseau C, Guillaume JC, Bernard P, Lok C, et al. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis. Analysis of 63 cases. Arch Dermatol. 1991;127(9):1333–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. 149.
    Pigatto P, Bombeccari G, Spadari F, Guzzi G. Palate erythema migrans and mercury dental amalgam. Indian J Dentist. 2010;1:3.Google Scholar
  150. 150.
    Kresbach H, Kerl H, Wawschinek O. Mercury granuloma of the skin. Berufsdermatosen. 1971;19(4):173–86.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  151. 151.
    Dantzig P. Grover’s disease and mercury. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2010;29(1):73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. 152.
    Hugoson A. Results obtained from patients referred for the investigation of complaints related to oral galvanism. Swed Dent J. 1986;10(1-2):15–28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  153. 153.
    Dantzig P. The role of mercury in pustulosis palmaris et plantaris. J Occup Environ Med. 2003;45(5):468–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. 154.
    Scalf LA, Fowler JF Jr, Morgan KW, Looney SW. Dental metal allergy in patients with oral, cutaneous, and genital lichenoid reactions. Am J Contact Dermat. 2001;12(3):146–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  155. 155.
    Fardal O, Johannessen AC, Morken T. Gingivo-mucosal and cutaneous reactions to amalgam fillings. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32(4):430–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. 156.
    Schapowal A, Enzmann H. Dermatopathic lymphadenopathy caused by amalgam allergy. A case report. Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg). 1987;66(2):73–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. 157.
    Rijlaarsdam JU, Bruynzeel DP, Vos W, Meijer CJ, Willemze R. Immunohistochemical studies of lymphadenosis benigna cutis occurring in a tattoo. Am J Dermatopathol. 1988;10(6):518–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. 158.
    Koch P, Nickolaus G. Allergic contact dermatitis and mercury exanthem due to mercury chloride in plastic boots. Contact Dermatitis. 1996;34(6):405–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  159. 159.
    Adachi A, Horikawa T, Takashima T, Ichihashi M. Mercury-induced nummular dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000;43(2 Pt 2):383–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. 160.
    Pigatto PD, Guzzi G, Persichini P. Nummular lichenoid dermatitis from mercury dental amalgam. Contact Dermatitis. 2002;46(6):355–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. 161.
    Pigatto P, Brambilla L, Ferrucci S, Guzzi G. Nummular eczema due to mercury dental amalgam. Allergy. 2009;64(Suppl. 90):2.Google Scholar
  162. 162.
    Serrao R, Zirwas M, English JC. Palmar erythema. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2007;8(6):347–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  163. 163.
    Pigatto P, Brambilla L, Ferrucci S, Guzzi G. Hypersensitivity to mercury amalgam and palmoplantar pustulosis. Contact Dermatitis. 2012;66(Suppl. 2):2.Google Scholar
  164. 164.
    Yiannias JA, Winkelmann RK, Connolly SM. Contact sensitivities in palmar plantar pustulosis (acropustulosis). Contact Dermatitis. 1998;39(3):108–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. 165.
    Abreu Velez AM, Warfvinge G, Herrera WL, Abreu Velez CE, Montoya MF, Hardy DM, et al. Detection of mercury and other undetermined materials in skin biopsies of endemic pemphigus foliaceus. Am J Dermatopathol. 2003;25(5):384–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  166. 166.
    Rice KM, Walker EM Jr, Wu M, Gillette C, Blough ER. Environmental mercury and its toxic effects. J Prev Med Public Health. 2014;47(2):74–83.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  167. 167.
    Hybenova M, Hrda P, Prochazkova J, Stejskal V, Sterzl I. The role of environmental factors in autoimmune thyroiditis. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2010;31(3):283–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  168. 168.
    Arnett FC, Fritzler MJ, Ahn C, Holian A. Urinary mercury levels in patients with autoantibodies to U3-RNP (fibrillarin). J Rheumatol. 2000;27(2):405–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  169. 169.
    Veien NK. Stomatitis and systemic dermatitis from mercury in amalgam dental restorations. Dermatol Clin. 1990;8(1):157–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  170. 170.
    Hanzely B, Hadhazy S. Allergic reaction caused by amalgam filling. Fogorv Sz. 1980;73(7):208–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  171. 171.
    Pigatto PD, Guzzi G. Systemic allergic dermatitis syndrome caused by mercury. Contact Dermatitis. 2008;59(1):66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  172. 172.
    Miedler LJ, Forbes JD. Allergic contact dermatitis due to metallic mercury. Arch Environ Health. 1968;17(6):960–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  173. 173.
    Bass MH. Idiosyncrasy to metallic mercury, with special reference to amalgam fillings in the teeth. J Pediatr. 1943;23:4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  174. 174.
    Mathews KP. Immediate type hypersensitivity to phenylmercuric compounds. Am J Med. 1968;44(2):310–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  175. 175.
    Jacobs RL, Lowe RS, Lanier BQ. Adverse reactions to tetanus toxoid. JAMA. 1982;247(1):40–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  176. 176.
    Forstrom L, Hannuksela M, Kousa M, Lehmuskallio E. Merthiolate hypersensitivity and vaccination. Contact Dermatitis. 1980;6(4):241–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  177. 177.
    Hansson H, Moller H. Cutaneous reactions to merthiolate and their relationship to vaccination with tetanus toxoid. Acta Allergol. 1971;26(2):150–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  178. 178.
    Lindemayr H, Drobil M, Ebner H. Reactions to vaccinations against tetanus and tick-borne encephalitis caused by merthiolate (thimerosal). Hautarzt. 1984;35(4):192–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  179. 179.
    Juhlin L, Ohman S. Allergic reactions to mercury in red tattoos and in mucosa adjacent to amalgam fillings. Acta Derm Venereol. 1968;48(2):103–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  180. 180.
    Costa A, Branca V, Pigatto PD, Guzzi G. Aspergillosis, maxillary foreign body, and mercury amalgam. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;48(1):64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  181. 181.
    Meurman JH, Porko C, Murtomaa H. Patients complaining about amalgam-related symptoms suffer more often from illnesses and chronic craniofacial pain than their controls. Scand J Dent Res. 1990;98(2):167–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  182. 182.
    Pigatto P, Guzzi G, Ferrucci S, Brambilla L. Black hairy tongue, mercury dental amalgam, and allergy to metals. 13th Congress of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis 14–17 September 2016; Manchester 2016.Google Scholar
  183. 183.
    James J, Ferguson MM, Forsyth A. Mercury allergy as a cause of burning mouth. Br Dent J. 1985;159(12):392.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  184. 184.
    Bergdahl BJ, Anneroth G, Anneroth I. Clinical study of patients with burning mouth. Scand J Dent Res. 1994;102(5):299–305.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  185. 185.
    Brehler R, Panzer B, Forck G, Bertram HP. Mercury sensitization in amalgam fillings. Assessment from a dermatologic viewpoint. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1993;118(13):451–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  186. 186.
    Albert D. Mercury allergy as a cause of burning mouth. Br Dent J. 1986;160(6):186–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  187. 187.
    Pigatto PD, Berti E, Spadari F, Bombeccari GP, Guzzi G. Photoletter to the editor: exfoliative cheilitis associated with titanium dental implants and mercury amalgam. J Dermatol Case Rep. 2011;5(4):89–90.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  188. 188.
    Pigatto P, Guzzi G. Role of contact allergy to metals in oral pathologies. Contact Dermatitis. 2008;58(Suppl. 1):2.Google Scholar
  189. 189.
    Raap U, Stiesch M, Reh H, Kapp A, Werfel T. Investigation of contact allergy to dental metals in 206 patients. Contact Dermatitis. 2009;60(6):339–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  190. 190.
    Santosh V, Ranjith K, Shenoi SD, Sachin V, Balachandran C. Results of patch testing with dental materials. Contact Dermatitis. 1999;40(1):50–1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  191. 191.
    Sasaki R, Suzuki K, Hayashi T, Inasaka H, Matsunaga K. Improvement of Cheilitis granulomatosa after dental treatment. Case Rep Dermatol. 2011;3(2):151–4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  192. 192.
    Langworth S, Bjorkman L, Elinder CG, Jarup L, Savlin P. Multidisciplinary examination of patients with illness attributed to dental fillings. J Oral Rehabil. 2002;29(8):705–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  193. 193.
    Thorstensson B, Hugoson A. Prevalence of some oral complaints and their relation to oral health variables in an adult Swedish population. Acta Odontol Scand. 1996;54(4):257–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  194. 194.
    Jameson MW, Kardos TB, Kirk EE, Ferguson MM. Mucosal reactions to amalgam restorations. J Oral Rehabil. 1990;17(4):293–301.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  195. 195.
    Kirshen C, Pratt M. Dental allergic contact dermatitis: an interesting case series and review of the literature. Dermatitis. 2012;23(5):222–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  196. 196.
    Swartzendruber DE. The possible relationship between mercury from dental amalgam and diseases. I: effects within the oral cavity. Med Hypotheses. 1993;41(1):31–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  197. 197.
    McCullough MJ, Tyas MJ. Local adverse effects of amalgam restorations. Int Dent J. 2008;58(1):3–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  198. 198.
    Veron C, Hildebrand HF, Martin P. Dental amalgams and allergy. J Biol Buccale. 1986;14(2):83–100.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  199. 199.
    Spadari F, Bombeccari G, Pallotti F, Brambilla L, Ferrucci S, Guzzi G, et al. Plasma cell gingivitis due to allergy to dental metals. Allergy. 2013;68(Suppl. 97):2.Google Scholar
  200. 200.
    Dubois-Gosnet C. The oral mucosa and delayed hypersensitivity. Allerg Immunol (Paris). 2002;34(1):19–21.Google Scholar
  201. 201.
    Engel P. Observations on health before and after amalgam removal. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 1998;108(8):811–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  202. 202.
    Pigatto P, Arancio L, Guzzi G, Severi G. Metals from amalgam in saliva: association with lichenoid lesions, leukoplakia, burning mouth syndrome. Toxicol Lett. 2005;158:169–70.Google Scholar
  203. 203.
    Dunsche A, Kastel I, Terheyden H, Springer IN, Christophers E, Brasch J. Oral lichenoid reactions associated with amalgam: improvement after amalgam removal. Br J Dermatol. 2003;148(1):70–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  204. 204.
    Laine J, Kalimo K, Happonen RP. Contact allergy to dental restorative materials in patients with oral lichenoid lesions. Contact Dermatitis. 1997;36(3):141–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  205. 205.
    Ibbotson SH, Speight EL, Macleod RI, Smart ER, Lawrence CM. The relevance and effect of amalgam replacement in subjects with oral lichenoid reactions. Br J Dermatol. 1996;134(3):420–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  206. 206.
    Laeijendecker R, Dekker SK, Burger PM, Mulder PG, Van Joost T, Neumann MH. Oral lichen planus and allergy to dental amalgam restorations. Arch Dermatol. 2004;140(12):1434–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  207. 207.
    Laine J, Kalimo K, Forssell H, Happonen RP. Resolution of oral lichenoid lesions after replacement of amalgam restorations in patients allergic to mercury compounds. Br J Dermatol. 1992;126(1):10–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  208. 208.
    Bolewska J, Hansen HJ, Holmstrup P, Pindborg JJ, Stangerup M. Oral mucosal lesions related to silver amalgam restorations. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1990;70(1):55–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  209. 209.
    Koch P, Bahmer FA. Oral lichenoid lesions, mercury hypersensitivity and combined hypersensitivity to mercury and other metals: histologically-proven reproduction of the reaction by patch testing with metal salts. Contact Dermatitis. 1995;33(5):323–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  210. 210.
    Pigatto PD, Brambilla L, Guzzi G, Spadari F. Burning lips syndrome. Contact Dermatitis. 2007;57(5):344–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  211. 211.
    Barbhaiya M, Costenbader KH. Environmental exposures and the development of systemic lupus erythematosus. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2016;28(5):497–505.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  212. 212.
    Mok CC, Leung B, Fong B, Wong CK. THU0300 serum mercury level and disease activity of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE): a case-control study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72:A267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  213. 213.
    Hougeir FG, Yiannias JA, Hinni ML, Hentz JG, El-Azhary RA. Oral metal contact allergy: a pilot study on the cause of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Dermatol. 2006;45(3):265–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  214. 214.
    Guzzi G, Corsi MM, Pallotti F, La Porta CA, Spadari F. HER-2/neu expression in plasma and biopsy of patients with oral lichen planus in comparison to leukoplakia. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2006;20(8):1027–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  215. 215.
    Weber ME, Yiannias JA, Hougeir FG, Kyle A, Noble BN, Landry AM, et al. Intraoral metal contact allergy as a possible risk factor for oral squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2012;121(6):389–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  216. 216.
    Guzzi G, Pigatto PD, Severi G. Oral cancer: an association with dental metal restorations and allergy to metals? Int J Dermatol. 2007;46(8):885.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  217. 217.
    Guzzi G, Pigatto PD. More on methyl mercury. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2005;206(1):94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  218. 218.
    Banoczy J, Roed-Petersen B, Pindborg JJ, Inovay J. Clinical and histologic studies on electrogalvanically induced oral white lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1979;48(4):319–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  219. 219.
    Tosti A, Piraccini BM, Peluso AM. Contact and irritant stomatitis. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 1997;16(4):314–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  220. 220.
    Lind PO, Hurlen B, Stromme KH. Electrogalvanically-induced contact allergy of the oral mucosa. Report of a case. Int J Oral Surg. 1984;13(4):339–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  221. 221.
    Camisa C, Taylor JS, Bernat JR Jr, Helm TN. Contact hypersensitivity to mercury in amalgam restorations may mimic oral lichen planus. Cutis. 1999;63(3):189–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  222. 222.
    Jolly M, Moule AJ, Bryant RW, Freeman S. Amalgam-related chronic ulceration of oral mucosa. Br Dent J. 1986;160(12):434–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  223. 223.
    Tomka M, Machovcova A, Pelclova D, Petanova J, Arenbergerova M, Prochazkova J. Orofacial granulomatosis associated with hypersensitivity to dental amalgam. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011;112(3):335–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  224. 224.
    Lazarov A, Kidron D, Tulchinsky Z, Minkow B. Contact orofacial granulomatosis caused by delayed hypersensitivity to gold and mercury. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;49(6):1117–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  225. 225.
    Ellison R, Green C, Gibson J, Ghaffar S. Orofacial granulomatosis related to amalgam fillings. Scott Med J. 2013;58(4):e24–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  226. 226.
    Guttman-Yassky E, Weltfriend S, Bergman R. Resolution of orofacial granulomatosis with amalgam removal. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2003;17(3):344–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  227. 227.
    Cedrola S, Guzzi G, Crippa R, Bouquot JE, La Porta CA. Amalgam fillings associated with increased matrix metalloproteinase 9 levels in human saliva. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2005;19(4):509–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  228. 228.
    Bergenholtz A. Multiple polypous hyperplasias of the oral mucosa with regression after removal of amalgam fillings. Acta Odontol Scand. 1965;23(2):111–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  229. 229.
    Pigatto PD, Elli L, Guzzi G, Bardella MT. Is nickel in amalgam capable of aphthous stomatitis in a patient reacting to nickel? Eur J Dermatol. 2008;18(6):726–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  230. 230.
    Martin MD, Williams BJ, Charleston JD, Oda D. Spontaneous exfoliation of teeth following severe elemental mercury poisoning: case report and histological investigation for mechanism. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1997;84(5):495–501.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  231. 231.
    Handley J, Todd D, Burrows D. Mercury allergy in a contact dermatitis clinic in Northern Ireland. Contact Dermatitis. 1993;29(5):258–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  232. 232.
    von Mayenburg J, Rakoski J, Szliska C. Patch testing with amalgam at various concentrations. Contact Dermatitis. 1991;24(4):266–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  233. 233.
    Hensten-Pettersen A, Holland RI. Side effects due to dental materials. Tandlakartidningen. 1985;77(20):1103–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  234. 234.
    Pigatto PD, Guzzi G. Cobalt-based dental alloy, allergy to cobalt, and palmoplantar pustulosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012;113(2):153–4. author reply 4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  235. 235.
    Muris J, Kleverlaan CJ, Rustemeyer T, von Blomberg ME, van Hoogstraten IM, Feilzer AJ, et al. Sodium tetrachloropalladate for diagnosing palladium sensitization. Contact Dermatitis. 2012;67(2):94–100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  236. 236.
    Woods JS, Heyer NJ, Echeverria D, Russo JE, Martin MD, Bernardo MF, et al. Modification of neurobehavioral effects of mercury by a genetic polymorphism of coproporphyrinogen oxidase in children. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2012;34(5):513–21.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  237. 237.
    Bargiggia C, Ronchi A, Soldarini A, Barbaro M, Pigatto P, Guzzi G. Metamyelocytes associated with mercury exposure. Toxicol Lett. 2016;258(Suppl):1.Google Scholar
  238. 238.
    Axell T, Nilner K, Nilsson B. Clinical evaluation of patients referred with symptoms related to oral galvanism. Swed Dent J. 1983;7(5):169–78.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  239. 239.
    Herrstrom P, Hogstedt B, Holthuis N, Schutz A, Rastam L. Allergic disease, immunoglobulins, exposure to mercury and dental amalgam in Swedish adolescents. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1997;69(5):339–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  240. 240.
    Pigatto PD, Brambilla L, Ferrucci S, Guzzi G. Allergy to dental metal alloys and levels of serum soluble interleukin 2 receptor. Contact Dermatitis. 2012;66(Suppl. 2):1.Google Scholar
  241. 241.
    Guzzi G, Ronchi A, Bolengo I, Pontillo M, Soldini L, Soldarini A, et al. NSE: marker of the clinical toxicity of mercury. Toxicol Lett. 2015;238(2 Supplements):1.Google Scholar
  242. 242.
    Baasch E. Theoretical considerations on the etiology of multiple sclerosis. Is multiple sclerosis a mercury allergy? Schweiz Arch Neurol Neurochir Psychiatr. 1966;98(1):1–19.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  243. 243.
    Pelletier L, Druet P. Immunotoxicology of metal. In: Goyer RA, Cherian MG, editors. Handbook of experimental pharmacology, vol. 1151995. p. 72–92.Google Scholar
  244. 244.
    Corrales Torres JL, De Corres F. Anaphylactic hypersensitivity to mercurochrome (merbrominum). Ann Allergy. 1985;54(3):230–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  245. 245.
    Hendry WF, A'Hern RP, Cole PJ. Was Young’s syndrome caused by exposure to mercury in childhood? BMJ. 1993;307(6919):1579–82.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Italian Association for Metals and Biocompatibility Research, A.I.R.M.E.B.MilanItaly
  2. 2.Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, Unit of DermatologyIRCCS Galeazzi Hospital, University of MilanMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations