Dynamic Measurement of Pilot Situation Awareness

  • Xu Wu
  • Chuanyan Feng
  • Xiaoru Wanyan
  • Yu Tian
  • Shoupeng Huang
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10276)

Abstract

This study mainly concentrated on ergonomics evaluation of the pilot situational awareness (SA) based on flight simulation platform and validation of prediction dynamic model according to the experimental result. The experiment scenario was designed as typical right-hand traffic pattern flight task. And situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT) method was used to measure the changing tendency of SA during the entire flight task, that the effectiveness of prediction model was verified by regression analysis. Moreover, online test of cognition capability was adopted to examine the relevance of SA under flight simulation task. The experiment revealed that the prediction model was validated with reasonable effectiveness, and SA of different subject varied, which was correlated with characteristics of cognition capability.

Keywords

Situational awareness Dynamic measurement Flight simulation task Ergonomics experiment Cognition capability 

References

  1. 1.
    Wei, H.Y., Zhuang, D.M., Wanyan, X.R., et al.: An experimental analysis of situation awareness for cockpit display interface evaluation based on flight simulation. Chin. J. Aeronaut. 26, 884–889 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Endsley, M.R.: Situation awareness in aviation systems. In: Handbook of Aviation Human Factors, pp. 257–276 (1999)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Endsley, M.R.: Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum. Factors 37, 32–64 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Endsley, M.R.: Errors in situation assessment: implications for system design. In: Elzer, P.F., Kluwe, R.H., Boussoffara, B. (eds) Human Error and System Design and Management. LNCIS, vol. 253, pp. 12–26. Springer, London, (2000)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Endsley, M.R.: Measurement of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum. Factors 37, 65–84 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Salmon P., Stanton N., Walker G., et al: Situation awareness measurement: a review of applicability for C4I environments. Appl. Ergon. 37, 225–238 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jennifer, M.R., David, B.K., John, V.D.: Situation awareness and attention allocation measures for quantifying telepresence experiences in teleoperation. Hum. factors Ergon. Manufact. 14, 51–67 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Endsley, M.R.: Automation and Human Performance: Theory and Application, pp. 163–181. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (1996)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wickens, C.D., Jason, M.C., Thomas, L.: Attention–situation awareness (A-SA) model. In: NASA Aviation Safety Program Conference on Human Performance Modeling of Approach and Landing with Augmented Displays, pp. 189–205. NASA (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liu, S., Wanyan, X.R., Zhuang, D.M.: Modeling the situation awareness by the analysis of cognitive process. J. Bio-Med. Mater. Eng. 24, 2311–2318 (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wu, X., Wanyan, X., Zhuang, D.: Pilot attention allocation modeling under multiple factors condition. In: Harris, D. (ed.) EPCE 2013. LNCS, vol. 8020, pp. 212–221. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-39354-9_24 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wu, X., Wanyan, X., Zhuang, D., Liu, S.: Pilot situational awareness modeling for cockpit interface evaluation. In: Harris, D. (ed.) EPCE 2016. LNCS, vol. 9736, pp. 476–484. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-40030-3_46 Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cambridge Brain Sciences. http://www.cambridgebrainsciences.com/

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xu Wu
    • 1
  • Chuanyan Feng
    • 1
  • Xiaoru Wanyan
    • 1
  • Yu Tian
    • 2
  • Shoupeng Huang
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Aeronautics and EngineeringBeihang UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Astronaut Center of ChinaBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations