Abstract
Recently, the New Holland Company brought to Brazil a forager machine to harvest short rotation coppice (SRC) Eucalyptus plantation focusing on high quantity of low-priced woodchips. There are other harvesting machines available on market and each harvesting system has pros and cons. Since, in general, the harvesting and chipping costs represents the main operational costs, evaluating the economic feasibility of the chosen harvesting system is crucial. Therefore, a case study was conducted to analyse the cost of this new system in Brazil that uses a modified forager harvester and a pulled-tractor silage trailer in SRC Eucalyptus plantation. The cost analysis methodology was adapted from ASABE and the costs obtained were determined in two units: cost per time and quantity harvested in oven-dry ton (odt). The system’s effective field productivity and productivity were 0.44 ha h–1 and 31.0 odt h–1, respectively. The harvest system’s total operational cost was € 258 pmh–1 or € 18.9 odt–1 and the harvester machine was the largest contributor of total cost with fixed total cost of € 87 pmh–1 and € 6.4 odt–1. In spite of high labor charges values and high exchange rates in Brazil, the total estimated cost was cheaper than the ones found in temperate countries. From the total cost, depreciation and fuel consumption were the biggest influences. Thus, the experience levels of the harvester and tractor operators are crucial to this system economy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers. (2011a). ASABE Standards 2011. ASABE Standards EP4963—Agricultural machinery management data (p. 6). St. Joseph, MI: ASABE.
American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers. (2011b). ASABE Standards 2011. ASABE Standards D4977—Agricultural machinery management data (p. 8). St. Joseph, MI: ASABE.
Berhongaray, G., El Kasmioui, O., & Ceulemans, R. (2013). Comparative analysis of harvesting machines on an operational high-density short rotation woody crop (SRWC) culture: One-process versus two-process harvest operation. Biomass and Bioenergy, 58, 333–342.
Culshaw, D., & Stokes, B. (1995). Mechanisation of short rotation forestry. Biomass and Bioenergy, 9, 127–140.
Cunha, A. R., & Martins, D. (2009). Classificação climática para os municípios de Botucatu e São Manuel, SP. Irriga, Botucatu 14, 1–11 [Portuguese].
Dillen, S., Djomo, S. N., Al Afas, N., Vanbeveren, S., & Ceulemans, R. (2013). Biomass yield and energy balance of a short-rotation poplar coppice with multiple clones on degraded land during 16 years. Biomass and Bioenergy, 56, 157–165.
Eisenbies, M. H., Volk, T. A., Posselius, J., Foster, C., Shi, S., & Karapetyan, S. (2014). Evaluation of a single-pass, cut and chip harvest system on commercial-scale, short-rotation shrub willow biomass crops. Bioenergy Research, 7, 1506–1518.
Ergül, E., & Ayrilmis, N. (2014). Effect of outdoor storage conditions of wood chip pile on the technological properties of wood-based panel. Biomass and Bioenergy, 61, 66–72.
Eufrade Junior, H. J., Melo, R. X., Sartori, M. M. P., Guerra, S. P. S., & Ballarin, A. W. (2016). Sustainable use of Eucalyptus biomass on short rotation coppice for bioenergy. Biomass and Bioenergy, 90, 15–21.
Filho, A. G., Lanças, K. P., Leite, F., Acosta, J. J., & Jesuino, P. R. (2010). Desempenho de trator agrícola em três superfícies de solo e quatro velocidades de deslocamento. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental, 14, 333–339 [Portuguese].
Fiorese, D. A., Dallmeyer, A. U., Romano, L. N., Schlosser, J. F., & Machado, P. R. N. (2012). Desempenho de um motor de trator agrícola em bancada dinamométrica com biodiesel de óleo de frango e misturas binárias com óleo diesel. Ciência Rural, 42, 660–666 [Portuguese].
Garcia, E. A. (2013). Qualidade energética da madeira de eucalipto em função do espaçamento, da adubação e da idade conduzida no sistema florestal de curta rotação (p. 57). Botucatu/SP: Universidade Estadual Paulista [Portuguese]
Ghaffariyan, M., Brown, M., Acuna, M., Sessions, J., Kuehmaier, M., & Wiedemann, J. (2011). Biomass harvesting in Eucalyptus plantations in Western Australia. Southern Forests: A Journal of Forest Science, 73, 149–154.
Gonçalves, J. L. M., et al. (2013). Integrating genetic and silvicultural strategies to minimize abiotic and biotic constraints in Brazilian eucalypt plantations. Forest Ecology and Management, 301, 6–27.
Guerra, S. P. S., Lanças, K. P., Garcia, E. A., & Spinelli, R. (2012). Eucalipto adensado: manejo para florestal energéticas. In E. G. M. Lemos & N. R. Stradiotto (Eds.), Bioenergia: desenvolvimento, pesquisa e inovação (p. 1069). São Paulo: Ed. Unesp [Portuguese]
Guerra, S. P. S., Garcia, E. A., Lanças, K. P., Rezende, M. A., & Spinelli, R. (2014). Heating value of eucalypt wood grown on SRC for energy production. Fuel, 137, 360–363.
IBA. (2015). Statistics of the Brazilian Tree Industry, Report 2015 (p. 64). Brasília: Brazilian Tree Industry.
Kavgic, M., Mumovic, D., Summerfield, A., Stevanovic, Z., & Ecim-Djuric, O. (2013). Uncertainty and modeling energy consumption: Sensitivity analysis for a city-scale domestic energy model. Energy and Buildings, 60, 1–11.
Kuratorium für Technik und Bauwesen in der Landwirtschaft. (2014). KTBL 2014: Datensammlung. Kuratorium für Technik und Bauwesen in der Landwirtschaft. KTBL 2014. Datensammlung: Auflage [German]
Lopes, A., Lanças, K. P., Furlani, C. E., Nagaoka, A. K., Castro Neto, P., & Grotta, D. D. C. (2003). Consumo de combustível de um trator em função do tipo de pneu, da lastragem e da velocidade de trabalho. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental, 7, 382–386 [Portuguese].
Manzone, M., & Balsari, P. (2015). Productivity and woodchip quality of different chippers during poplar plantation harvesting. Biomass and Bioenergy, 83, 278–283.
Mitchell, C., Stevens, E., & Watters, M. (1999). Short-rotation forestry—Operations, productivity and costs based on experience gained in the UK. Forest Ecology and Management, 121, 123–136.
Monteiro, L. A., Lanças, K. P., & Guerra, S. P. S. (2011). Desempenho de um trator agrícola equipado com pneus radiais e diagonais com três níveis de lastros líquidos. Engenharia Agrícola, 31, 551–560 [Portuguese].
Nurminen, T., Korpunen, H., & Uusitalo, J. (2006). Time consumption analysis of the mechanized cut-to-length harvesting system. Silva Fennica, 40, 335.
Nyström, J., & Dahlquist, E. (2004). Methods for determination of moisture content in woodchips for power plants—A review. Fuel, 83, 773–779.
Pereira, I. M., & de Assis, I. S. (2013). Urban energy consumption mapping for energy management. Energy Policy, 59, 257–269.
Schweier, J., & Becker, G. (2012a). New Holland forage harvester’s productivity in short rotation coppice: Evaluation of field studies from a German perspective. International Journal of Forest Engineering, 23, 82–88.
Schweier, J., & Becker, G. (2012b). Harvesting of short rotation coppice—Harvesting trials with a cut and storage system in Germany. Silva Fennica, 46, 287–299.
Sgroi, F., Di Trapani, A. M., Foderà, M., Testa, R., & Tudisca, S. (2015). Economic assessment of Eucalyptus (spp.) for biomass production as alternative crop in Southern Italy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 44, 614–619.
Soler, R. R., Lanças, K. P., Guerra, S. P. S., Sereghetti, G. S., Oguri, G., & Guimarães, R. T. S. (2013). Incremento médio anual pós colheita mecanizada em sistema de rebrota. In 8° Congresso Internacional de Bioenergia, São Paulo [Portuguese].
Spinelli, R., & Magagnotti, N. (2010). Comparison of two harvesting systems for the production of forest biomass from the thinning of Picea abies plantations. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 25, 69–77.
Spinelli, R., Hartsough, B. R., & Magagnotti, N. (2005). Testing mobile chippers for chip size distribution. International Journal of Forest Engineering, 16, 29–35.
Spinelli, R., Nati, C., & Magagnotti, N. (2009). Using modified foragers to harvest short-rotation poplar plantations. Biomass and Bioenergy, 33, 817–821.
Spinelli, R., Nati, C., Sozzi, L., Magagnotti, N., & Picchi, G. (2011). Physical characterization of commercial woodchips on the Italian energy market. Fuel, 90, 2198–2202.
Spinelli, R., Cavallo, E., Eliasson, L., & Facello, A. (2013). Comparing the efficiency of drum and disc chippers. Silva Fennica, 47(2), 1–11.
Stape, J. L., Binkley, D., & Ryan, M. G. (2004). Eucalyptus production and the supply, use and efficiency of use of water, light and nitrogen across a geographic gradient in Brazil. Forest Ecology and Management, 193, 17–31.
Tharakan, P., Volk, T., Abrahamson, L., & White, E. (2003). Energy feedstock characteristics of willow and hybrid poplar clones at harvest age. Biomass and Bioenergy, 25, 571–580.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Guerra, S.P.S., Oguri, G., Takitane, I.C., Caterina, G.L., Esperancini, M.S.T. (2017). Economic Evaluation of Short Rotation Eucalyptus Plantation Harvesting System: A Case Study. In: Dabbert, S., Lewandowski, I., Weiss, J., Pyka, A. (eds) Knowledge-Driven Developments in the Bioeconomy. Economic Complexity and Evolution. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58374-7_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58374-7_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58373-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-58374-7
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)