Science and Policies of Deforestation in the Amazon: Reflecting Ethnographically on Multidisciplinary Collaboration
This chapter discusses results from an ethnography of a multidisciplinary scientific project focused on the Amazon. The ethnography shows that arriving at usable scientific results through interdisciplinary work can be a challenge because such sharing is conditioned by misunderstandings between disciplinary boundaries. These misunderstandings involve disparate views on the potentials of modelling to be applied to social phenomena, which affects how the knowledge production process was carried out in practice. By making these challenges visible and analysable, ethnography can be a powerful tool in such cooperative efforts, helping scientists to navigate issues which, although usually seen as problems, can be mobilized as an important part of the process of knowledge production.
KeywordsEthnography Anthropology of science and technology Science-policy interface Environmental infrastructures STS Brazil
- Amazalert. 2015. Final Report Summary – AMAZALERT (Raising the Alert About Critical Feedbacks Between Climate and Long-term Land Use Change in the Amazon). Amazalert Project. http://cordis.europa.eu/result/rcn/165704_en.html. Accessed 14 Dec 2016.
- Andreae, M., O. Acevedo, A. Araújo, P. Artaxo, et al. 2015. The Amazon Tall Tower Observatory (ATTO) in the Remote Amazon Basin: Overview of First Results from Ecosystem Ecology, Meteorology, Trace Gas, and Aerosol Measurements. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 15: 10723–10776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Avissar, R., P. Silva Dias, M. Silva Dias, and C. Nobre. 2002. The Large-Scale Biosphere-Atmosphere Experiment in Amazonia (LBA): Insights and Future Research Needs. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 107(D20): LBA 54-1–LBA 54-6.Google Scholar
- Collins, H., and S. Yearley. 1992. Epistemological Chicken. In Science as Practice and Culture, ed. A. Pickering, 301–326. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Edwards, P. 2003. Infrastructure and Modernity: Force, Time, and Social Organization in the History of Sociotechnical Systems. In Modernity and Technology, ed. T. Misa, P. Brey, and A. Feenberg, 185–225. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- ———. 2010. A Vast Machine: Computer Models, Climate Data, and the Politics of Global Warming. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Forsythe, D. 1998. Using Ethnography to Investigate Life Scientists’ Information Needs. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 86(3): 402–409.Google Scholar
- Irwin, A. 2008. STS Perspectives on Scientific Governance. In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, ed. E. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, and J. Wajcman, 583–607. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Lapola, D., and R. Norby 2014. Amazon-FACE: Assessing the Effects of Increased Atmospheric CO2 on the Ecology and Resilience of the Amazon Forest–Science plan and Implementation Strategy. https://amazonface.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/amazon-face-science-plan.pdf. Accessed 16 Dec 2016.
- Latour, B. 1995. The ‘Pedofil’ of Boa Vista: A Photo-Philosophical Montage. Common Knowledge 4(1): 144–187.Google Scholar
- Latour, B., and S. Woolgar. 1986. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Miguel, J., and M. Monteiro. 2014a. Por que devemos nos interessar por modelos climáticos? Climacom 1(1): 6–17.Google Scholar
- ——— 2014b. Modelos do Clima, Modelos Políticos: Uma breve historiografia da previsão numérica e modelagem climática no CPTEC/INPE. Anais da REACT-Reunião de Antropologia da Ciência e Tecnologia, Campinas, 2014.Google Scholar
- Miller, C. 2004. Climate Science and the Making of a Global Political Order. In States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and the Social Order, ed. S. Jasanoff, 46–66. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Miller, C., and P. Edwards. 2001. Changing the Atmosphere: Expert Knowledge and Environmental Governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Monteiro, M. 2012. Imagens de satélite como sítio etnográfico? Interpretando práticas de sensoriamento remoto no Brasil. In Ciência, Tecnologia e Sociedade no Brasil, ed. M. Kerbauy, T. Andrade, and C. Hayashi, 251–278. Campinas: Alínea.Google Scholar
- Mosse, D. 2005. Cultivating Development: An Ethnography of Aid Policy and Practice. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
- ———. 2007. Notes on the Ethnography of Expertise and Professionals in International Development. Ethnografeast III ‘Ethnography and the Public Sphere’, Lisbon.Google Scholar
- ———. 1992. Controversy: Politics of Technical Decisions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Pereira, G. 2008. Política Espacial Brasileira e a Trajetória do INPE (1961–2007). PhD dissertation, State University of Campinas.Google Scholar
- Rajão, R. 2012. ICTBased Monitoring of Climate Change Related Deforestation: The Case of INPE in the Brazilian Amazon. NICCD. http://www.niccd.org/node/40. Accessed 16 Dec 2016.
- Shore, C., and S. Wright. 2003. Anthropology of Policy: Perspectives on Governance and Power. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Vergara, W., and S. Scholz 2011 Assessment of the Risk of Amazon Dieback. The World Bank. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/228631468015874565/Assessment-of-the-risk-of-Amazon-dieback. Accessed 5 Nov 2015.