Skip to main content

Salivary Gland Imaging

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Gland-Preserving Salivary Surgery

Abstract

Diagnostic imaging of the salivary glands is important in the clinical evaluation of salivary gland disorders. Imaging can aid in establishing a diagnosis and planning appropriate therapy. The roles of imaging include characterizing lesions within the salivary glands, delineating anatomic landmarks for surgical planning, evaluating for sources of salivary obstruction, and assessing for inflammatory disease-related structural changes.

In this chapter, we will discuss various imaging modalities used to assess the major salivary glands including ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), sialography, and nuclear studies. Cost, radiation exposure, accuracy, reliability, and patient satisfaction should be considered when choosing the optimal imaging technique for each patient. The benefits and limitations of each imaging modality based on clinical presentation will be reviewed, and imaging evaluation of common salivary gland disorders will be discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Rzymska-Grala I, Stopa Z, Grala B, Golebiowski M, Wanyura H, Zuchowska A, et al. Salivary gland calculi—contemporary methods of imaging. Pol J Radiol. 2010;75(3):25–37.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Kiringoda R, Eisele DW, Chang JL. A comparison of parotid imaging characteristics and sialendoscopic findings in obstructive salivary disorders. Laryngoscope. 2014;124(12):2696–701. doi:10.1002/lary.24787.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jecker P, Orloff LA. Salivary gland ultrasonography. In: Orloff LA, editor. Head and neck ultrasonography. San Diego: Plural Publishing; 2008. p. 129–52.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Harnsberger HR, Glastonbury CM. Parotid space. In: Harnsberger HR, editor. Diagnostic imaging: head and neck. Salt Lake: Amirsys; 2004. Section 7. p. 2–36.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gritzmann N, Rettenbacher T, Hollerweger A, Macheiner P, Hubner E. Sonography of the salivary glands. Eur Radiol. 2003;13(5):964–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R, Kim KP, Mahesh M, Gould R, et al. Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(22):2078–86. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2009.427.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Afzelius P, Nielsen MY, Ewertsen C, Boch KP. Imaging of the major salivary glands. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2016;36(1):1–10. doi:10.1111/cpf.12199.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hoffman HT (editor). Sialograms and sialography. In: Iowa head and neck protocols. 2015. https://iowaheadneckprotocols.oto.uiowa.edu/display/protocols/Sialograms+and+Sialography. Accessed 18 Mar 2016.

  9. Becker M, Marchal F, Becker CD, Dulguerov P, Georgakopoulos G, Lehmann W, et al. Sialolithiasis and salivary ductal stenosis: diagnostic accuracy of MR sialography with a three-dimensional extended-phase conjugate-symmetry rapid spin-echo sequence. Radiology. 2000;217(2):347–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jager L, Menaer F, Holzknecht N, Scholz V, Grevers G, Reiser M. Sialolithiasis: MR sialography of the submandibular duct – an alternative to conventional sialography and US? Radiology. 2000;216(3):665–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shizukuishi K, Nagaoka S, Kinno Y, Saito M, Takahashi N, Kawamoto M, et al. Scoring analysis of salivary gland scintigraphy in patients with Sjogren’s syndrome. Ann Nucl Med. 2003;17(8):627–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sigismund PE, Zenk J, Koch M, et al. Nearly 3,000 salivary stones: some clinical and epidemiologic aspects. Laryngoscope. 2015;125(8):1879–82. doi:10.1002/lary.25377.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sun Z, Zhang Z, Fu K, Zhao Y, Liu D, Ma Z. Diagnostic accuracy of parotid CT for identifying Sjogren’s syndrome. Eur J Radiol. 2010;81(10):2702–9. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.12.034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Vitali C, Bombardieri S, Jonsson R, et al. Classification criteria for Sjögren’s syndrome: a revised version of the European criteria proposed by the American-European Consensus Group. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002;61:664–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yonetsu K, Takagi Y, Sumi M, Eguchi K, Nakamura T. Sonography as a replacement for sialography for the diagnosis of salivary glands affected by Sjogren’s syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002;61:276–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Takagi Y, Sumi M, Nakamura H, Iwamoto N, Horai Y, Kawakami A, Nakamura T. Ultrasounography as an additional item in the American College of Rheumatology classification of Sjogren’s syndrome. Rheumatology. 2014;53(11):1977–83. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keu238.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ryan WR, Chang JL, Eisele DW. Surgeon-performed ultrasound and transfacial sialoendoscopy for complete parotid duct stenosis. Laryngoscope. 2014;124(2):418–20. doi:10.1002/lary.23968.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jolie L. Chang M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chang, J.L. (2018). Salivary Gland Imaging. In: Gillespie, M., Walvekar, R., Schaitkin, B., Eisele, D. (eds) Gland-Preserving Salivary Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58335-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58335-8_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58333-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-58335-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics