Business Process Modeling of a Quality System in a Petroleum Industry Company
Situation faced: The petroleum industry is characterized by increased focus on safety and compliance with regulations, in addition to efficient operations. Earlier quality systems were represented in large binders of textual documents, which made important governing documentation difficult to access and unusable for operational personnel who wished to gain an overview.
Action taken: Based on the existing quality system, a new way of structuring and accessing the material was developed as a collection of 2000 process models with navigational support through an intranet solution whose use was mandatory in the workplace.
Results achieved: Improved compliance with regulations and reduction in the number of accidents were observed. This improvement is not attributable only to the restructuring and presentation of the quality system through process models, but the process models are a visible sign of the organization’s focus on safety and compliance, and it has made it easier for workers to find relevant regulations and requirements when dangerous work is to be undertaken.
Lessons learned: Although good results have been achieved, there is room for improvement in this large-scale example of the use of process models to structure a company’s quality system. Ensuring that all employees can find all the models they need and that the models are kept up to date based on practice are important challenges. In addition, handling the trade-offs among goals for safety, efficiency, and compliance is a challenge. Modeling practices that were regarded favorably at an earlier stage might come to be seen as insufficient for the future needs. Therefore, professional long-term use of models must be conscientiously pursued over time.
- Aagesen, G., & Krogstie, J. (2015). BPMN 2.0 for modeling business processes. In J. vom Brocke & M. Rosemann (Eds.), Handbook on business process management. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Christensen, L. C., Johansen, B. W., Midjo, N., Onarheim, J., Syvertsen, T., & Totland, T. (1995). Enterprise modeling-practices and perspectives. Computers in Engineering, 1071–1084.Google Scholar
- Gjersvik, R., Krogstie, J., & Følstad, A. (2005). Participatory development of enterprise process models. In J. Krogstie, K. Siau, & T. Halpin (Eds.), Information modelling methods and methodologies. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishers.Google Scholar
- Heggset, M., Krogstie, J., & Wesenberg, H. (2014). Ensuring quality of large scale industrial process collections: Experiences from a case study. In The practice of enterprise modeling (pp. 11–25). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Heggset, M., Krogstie, J., & Wesenberg, H. (2015a). Understanding model quality concerns when using process models in an industrial company. In Proceedings from EMMSAD 2015. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Heggset, M., Krogstie, J., & Wesenberg, H. (2015b). The influence of syntactic quality of enterprise process models on model comprehension. CAiSE Forum. CEUR: Stockholm.Google Scholar
- Houy, C., Fettke, P., Loos, P., van der Aalst, W. M. P., & Krogstie, J. (2010). BPM-in-the-large – Towards a higher level of abstraction in business process management. In M. Janssen et al. (Eds.), EGES/GISP 2010, IFIP AICT 334 (pp. 233–244). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Krogstie, J., & Jørgensen, H. D. (2004). Interactive models for supporting networked organisations. In 16th Conference on advanced information systems engineering. Riga, Latvia: Springer.Google Scholar
- Krogstie, J., Dalberg, V., & Jensen, S. M. (2008). Process modeling value framework. In Y. Manolopoulos, J. Filipe, P. Constantopoulos, & J. Cordeiro (Eds.), Selected papers from 8th international Conference, ICEIS 2006 (Vol. LNBIP 3, pp. 309–321). Paphos, Cyprus: Springer.Google Scholar
- Lillehagen, F., & Krogstie, J. (2003). Active knowledge modeling and enterprise knowledge management enterprise inter- and intra-organizational integration. In Volume 108 of the series IFIP—The international federation for information processing (pp. 91–99). Boston: Springer.Google Scholar
- Malinova, M., Leopold, H., & Mendling, J. (2014, June 16–20). A meta-model for process map design. CAiSE Forum 2014. Thessaloniki, Greece.Google Scholar
- Silver, B. (2012). BPMN method and style. Aptos, CA: Cody-Cassidy Press.Google Scholar
- Solum, P. E., & Østerud, M. (1989). Integreret CASE-verktøy. Kartlegging av teknologien og problemer i forhold til tradisjonell systemutvikling. Master Thesis NTNU. Trondheim, Norway.Google Scholar
- Statoil. (2009). TR0002 enterprise structure and standard notation. Version 1.Google Scholar
- Statoil. (2013). TR0002 enterprise structure and standard notation. Version 3.Google Scholar
- Statoil. (2015). Statoil sustainability report. http://www.statoil.com/no/environmentsociety/sustainability/Pages/SustainabilityReporting.aspx
- Statoil. (2016). The Statoil book (2016). http://www.statoil.com/no/about/thestatoilbook/Pages/TheStatoilBook.aspx
- vom Brocke, J., Zelt, S, & Schmiedel, T. (2015, December 1). Considering context in business process management: The BPM context framework. BPM Trends.Google Scholar
- Wesenberg, H. (2011, November 2–3). Enterprise modeling in an agile world PoEM 2011. In Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Practice of Enterprise Modeling. Oslo, Norway.Google Scholar