Integrate Your Partners into Your Business Processes Using Interactive Forms: The Case of Automotive Industry Company HEYCO

  • Bernhard SchindlbeckEmail author
  • Peter Kleinschmidt
Part of the Management for Professionals book series (MANAGPROF)


Situation faced: The automotive industry company HEYCO-WERK Heynen GmbH & Co. KG (HEYCO) wanted to improve how it handled purchase order confirmations. Its purchase department spent a lot of time entering incoming purchase order confirmations from its vendors into its SAP system. This process had to be automated with the most suitable technology to make it more time- and cost-efficient.
  1. (a)

    Action taken: Before doing anything else, we had to choose the technology to support the process. Based on an empirical study, we developed a comparison scheme for business-to-business (B2B) technologies. We considered three types of technology, electronic data interchange (EDI), online portals, and interactive forms. Unlike the first two categories, interactive forms are seldom considered in the literature as an alternative B2B technology, but they turned out to be the best technology to support the purchase order confirmation process. Therefore, we chose them to support the process.

  2. (b)

    Results achieved: With the implementation of interactive forms as a B2B solution to process purchase order confirmations, we achieved essential efficiency gains in time and quality. Working with interactive forms is well accepted by the process owners in the purchase department, who were able to automate the recording of purchase order confirmations with more than 100 vendors within 6 months.

  3. (c)

    Lessons learned: Interactive forms turned to be a highly flexible and powerful tool in avoiding media breaks in document-driven processes. We present the results of a feedback round with HEYCO’s process owners, which was carried out 9 months after the introduction of the new procedure. Based on the input from those interviews, we discuss useful enhancements for the application to meet changed requirements and to accelerate technology adoption.



  1. Allen, B. J., Crum, M. R., & Braunschweig, C. D. (1992). The US motor carrier industry: The extent and nature of EDI use. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 22(8), 27–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Campo, S., Rubio, N., & Yagüe, M. J. (2010). Information technology use and firm’s perceived performance in supply chain management. Journal of Business to Business Marketing, 17(4), 336–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gmelch, O. (2012). User-Centric application integration in enterprise portal systems. Dissertations University of Regensburg. Lohmar: Eul.Google Scholar
  4. Hart, P. J., & Saunders, C. S. (1998). Emerging electronic partnerships: Antecedents and dimensions of EDI use from the supplier’s perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14, 87–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hauser, J., Deutesfeld, A., Rehmann, S., & Szücs, T. (2011). SAP interactive forms by Adobe (2nd ed.). Bonn: Galileo Press.Google Scholar
  6. Li, G., et al. (2009). The impact of IT implementation on supply chain integration and performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 120(1), 125–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Petersen, K. J., Ogden, J. A., & Carter, P. L. (2007). B2B e-marketplaces: A typology by functionality. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 37(1), 4–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Schindlbeck, B. (2015). Verbreitung und Durchdringung von Business-to-Business Technologien. Interaktive Formulare als alternative Technologie zur Unterstützung des Informationsaustauschs zwischen Unternehmen. Dissertations University of Passau. Berlin: Logos Verlag.Google Scholar
  9. Wecker, R. (2006). Internetbasiertes supply chain management. Dissertations University of Witten/Herdecke. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag.Google Scholar
  10. Wirtz, B. W., & Bronnenmayer, M. (2011). B2B-Geschäftsmodelle im Electronic Business. Wirtschaftswissenschaftliches Studium, 40(9), 454–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Wüstner, E. (2005). Standardisierung und Konvertierung: Ökonomische Bewertung und Anwendung am Beispiel von XML/EDI. Aachen: Shaker.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.4process AGPassauGermany

Personalised recommendations