Advertisement

Kiss the Documents! How the City of Ghent Digitizes Its Service Processes

  • Amy Van LooyEmail author
  • Sabine Rotthier
Chapter
Part of the Management for Professionals book series (MANAGPROF)

Abstract

  1. (a)

    Situation faced: The case focuses on the digitization of service processes in the City of Ghent. Front-office e-services are integrated into the corporate website and into the back office thanks to digitization of the internal way of working in value chains. Before 2014, the City’s digital services were limited primarily to web forms offered by three departments for taxes, mobility and parking affairs, and citizens’ affairs in a non-integrated way, as the departments used different applications and a considerable amount of manual work in the back office. Other departments focused primarily on downloadable forms that were available on the corporate website. Customers could also create profiles for some services, resulting in multiple user names and passwords to be managed for the same customer. Because of this silo mentality, the digital investments did not pay off, and a more integrated approach was needed to make the digital service processes more efficient in terms of return on investment (ROI) and customer-oriented.

     
  2. (b)

    Action taken: The City of Ghent formulated a digitization vision based on fifteen reusable building blocks, including that facilitate the use of an authentication platform, a single customer profile, a digital signature platform, and a service-oriented architecture. These building blocks guide projects that digitize the total value chains or business processes. To stimulate reuse, the building blocks were built as generic components or process activities that e-services typically contain (e.g., “create profile,” “pay electronically”). The generic components were first translated to the digitization of three pilot chains regarding taxes, environment-related subsidies, and citizens’ affairs. The pilots were chosen based on their having volunteered to participate and their opportunities to take advantage of digitization.

     
  3. (c)

    Results achieved: Although the pilot for citizens’ affairs is still running, the results of the pilots for digital tax submissions and environment-related subsidies are already positively perceived. All environment-related subsidy requests are now digitally processed in the back office, with a digital alternative in place for the process steps of receiving and responding to the subsidy requests in the front office since 2015. The number of digital tax submissions increased to a third of all submissions in 2016, compared to only five percentage in 2014, while the number of input forms was cut in half in favor of prefilled tax proposals. Besides being generalized to apply to all services in the City of Ghent, the digitization approach with building blocks and building projects will also be applied in other business processes and future projects such as a participation platform or intranet, so it is not exclusive to e-services. The main idea is to develop once and then to reuse it maximally.

     
  4. (d)

    Lessons learned: The case concludes with five lessons learned, from which other public and private organizations may benefit. First, from the perspective of reuse and inter-organizational collaboration, data about products or services should align semantically with external partners. The City of Ghent used linked open data for this purpose. Two lessons learned promote a pragmatic approach to achieving success by concretizing initial principles and temporary workarounds to achieve quick wins. The fourth lesson was the need for assistance by an internal support office or competence center. Finally, the demonstrated advantages arise from working with a single profile per customer, rather than working in silos.

     

References

  1. Dumas, M., La Rosa, M., Mendling, J., & Reijers, H. (2013). Fundamentals of business process management. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Lee, J. (2010). 10 year retrospect on stage models of e-Government: A qualitative meta-synthesis. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 220–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Müller, O., Schmiedel, T., Gorbacheva, E., & vom Brocke, J. (2016). Toward a typology of business process management professionals: Identifying patterns of competences through latent semantic analysis. Enterprise Information Systems, 10(1), 50–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ohno, T. (1988). Toyota production system beyong large-sclae production. New York: Productivity Press.Google Scholar
  5. OMG. (2011). Business process model and notation (version 2.0). Retrieved March, 2016, from http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0/PDF/
  6. Rosemann, M., & vom Brocke, J. (2015). The six core elements of business process management. In J. vom Brocke & M. Rosemann (Eds.), Handbook on business process management. Introduction, methods and information systems (Vol. 1, 2nd ed., pp. 105–122). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  7. Rosen, M., Lublinsky, B., Smith, K. T., & Balcer, M. J. (2012). Applied SOA: Service-oriented architecture and design strategies. Indianapolis: John Wiley Publishing.Google Scholar
  8. Rotthier, S. (2004). e-Government policies, strategies and implementation: e-Government in the federal country Belgium. In R. Traunmüller (Ed.), Electronic Government, EGOV proceedings (LNCS 3183, pp. 549–551). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Stad Gent. (2014). Stuurgroep eDienstverlening 14 okt 2014. Retreived February, 2016, from https://stad.gent/
  10. Stad Gent. (2016). Ghent in statistics. Retrieved March, 2016, from https://visit.gent.be/en/
  11. Sullivan, C. (2016). Digital citizenship and the right to digital identity under international law. Computer Law and Security Review, 32(3), 474–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Tegarden, D., Dennis, A., & Wixom, B. H. (2013). Systems analysis and design with UML. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  13. Van Looy, A., De Backer, M., & Poels, G. (2014). A conceptual framework and classification of capability areas for business process maturity. Enterprise Information Systems, 8(2), 188–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Van Looy, A., De Backer, M., Poels, G., & Snoeck, M. (2013). Choosing the right business process maturity model. Information and Management, 50(7), 466–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. vom Brocke, J., Zelt, S., & Schmiedel, T. (2016). On the role of context in business process management. International Journal of Information Management. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.10.002.
  16. Womack, J. P., & Jones, D. T. (2003). Lean thinking. Banish waste and create wealth in your corporation. London: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Economics and Business AdministrationGhent UniversityGhentBelgium
  2. 2.City of GhentGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations