Skip to main content

Gulliver’s Travels, Party Politics, and Empire

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Perspectives on the History of Political Economy

Abstract

Why did Jonathan Swift condemn “modern” colonies in Gulliver’s Travels? Answering this question requires placing Swift’s bestseller in the context of the post-1714 imperial crisis and of British imperial partisan politics. Understood in this light, Swift condemned both the Walpoleian Whig endorsement of hierarchical empire and their Patriot opponents’ embrace of a more inclusive commercialist imperial vision. Swift condemned the latter for its rejection of agrarian political economy in favor of commercial rapaciousness and the former for failing to recognize Ireland’s proper place in the Empire. Ireland, in Swift’s view, was properly a free kingdom and not a colony.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steve Pincus .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pincus, S. (2018). Gulliver’s Travels, Party Politics, and Empire. In: Fredona, R., Reinert, S. (eds) New Perspectives on the History of Political Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58247-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58247-4_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58246-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-58247-4

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics