Using Methodological Reviews and Meta-analyses to Identify Current Best Practices in School-Based Counseling

  • Michael P. Krezmien
  • Kristine A. Camacho
  • Jason C. Travers


This chapter is an introduction to the use of methodological reviews as a means for analyzing and synthesizing the available school counseling research through a systematic evaluation of the quality of the research method. In this chapter, we (a) describe the purpose of a methodological review, (b) provide a step-by step process for conducting a methodological review in school counseling, and (c) review three articles on school discipline to provide an example of the methodological review process using school counseling-related research articles. The aim is to help school counseling researchers and practitioners to understand the critical elements of quantitative research designs and provide the reader with a template and a process for analyzing and synthesizing school counseling research in a systematic manner.


  1. Achilles, G. M., McLaughlin, M. J., & Croninger, R. G. (2007). Sociocultural correlates of disciplinary exclusion among students with emotional, behavioral, and learning disabilities in the SEELS national dataset. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 15, 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cook, B. G., Landrum, T. J., Tankersley, M., & Kauffman, J. M. (2003). Bringing research to bear on practice: Effecting evidence-based instruction for students with emotional or behavioral disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 26, 345–361.Google Scholar
  3. Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D., Coyne, M., Greenwood, C., & Innocenti, M. S. (2005). Quality indicators for group experimental and quasi-experimental research in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Horner, R. H., Carr, E. G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hudson, S. S., Lewis, T., Stichter, J. P., & Johnson, N. W. (2011). Putting quality indicators to the test: An examination of 30 years of research. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 19, 143–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Krezmien, M. P., Leone, P. E., & Achilles, G. M. (2006). Suspension, race, and disability: Analysis of statewide practices and reporting. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 14, 217–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Misra, A., & Schloss, P. J. (1989). Respondent techniques for reduction of emotions limiting school adjustment: A quantitative review and methodological critique. Education and Treatment of Children, 12, 174–189.Google Scholar
  8. Mooney, P., Epstein, M. H., Reid, R., & Nelson, J. R. (2003). Status of and trends in academic intervention research for students with emotional disturbance. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 273–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mulcahy, C. A., Krezmien, M. P., & Travers, J. (2016). Improving mathematics performance among secondary students with EBD: A methodological review Remedial and Special Education, 37(2), 113–128.Google Scholar
  10. Odom, S. L., Brantlinger, E., Gersten, R., Horner, R. H., Thompson, B., & Harris, K. R. (2005). Research in special education: Scientific methods and evidence-based practices. Exceptional Children, 71, 137–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sullivan, A. L., Klingbeil, D. A., & Van Norman, E. R. (2013). Beyond behavior: Multilevel analysis of the influence of sociodemographics and school characteristics on students’ risk of suspension. School Psychology Review, 42, 99–114.Google Scholar
  12. Thompson, B., Diamond, K. E., McWilliam, R., Snyder, P., & Snyder, S. W. (2005). Evaluating the quality of evidence from correlational research for evidence-based practice. Exceptional Children, 71, 181–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Troia, G. A. (1999). Phonological awareness intervention research: A critical review of the experimental methodology. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 28–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael P. Krezmien
    • 1
  • Kristine A. Camacho
    • 1
  • Jason C. Travers
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Massachusetts AmherstAmherstUSA
  2. 2.University of KansasLawrenceUSA

Personalised recommendations