Advertisement

Using Mixed Methods to Evaluate Pilot Counselling Provision in Welsh Primary Schools

  • Susan Pattison
  • Maggie Robson
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter presents an evaluation project, set within a framework of collaboration and inclusion. The findings informed policy and practice in relation to the provision of counselling and therapeutic interventions in schools in Wales. The authors were part of a research team tasked to investigate whether a variety of therapeutic interventions offered to preschool children were effective in enhancing the children’s well-being. The research team used a collaborative and inclusive mixed methods approach developed through discussions with school staff. This chapter presents the evaluation project, discussing the process and the challenges, including that of validity.

References

  1. Clywch Inquiry. (2004). Report of the examination of the children’s commissioner for wales into allegations of child sexual abuse in a school setting: Chapter 21: children’s commissioner for wales.Google Scholar
  2. Cresswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Fossey, E., Harvey, C., McDermott, F., & Davidson, L. (2002). Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 36, 717–732.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2013). Learning from research: Systematic reviews for informing policy decisions: A quick guide. A paper for the Alliance for useful evidence. London: Nesta.Google Scholar
  5. Hill, A., Cooper, M., Smith, K., Maybanks, N., Cromarty, K., Pattison, S., et al. (2011). Evaluation of the Welsh school-based counselling strategy: Final report. Welsh Government Social Research, November, 23/2011.Google Scholar
  6. Hunt, K., & Robson, M. (2009). Therapeutic Intervention Processes (TIPs) questionnaire for children and young people v2 (v1 200, revised January 2009). Unpublished.Google Scholar
  7. Kemm, J. (2001). Evidence for policy – beyond the RCT. British Medical Journal, 322, 184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Laevers, F. (1999). The project Experiential Education. Well-being and involvement make the difference. Early Education, nr. 27, Discussion paper (4 pp.).Google Scholar
  9. McLeod, J. (2001). Qualitative research in counselling and psychotherapy. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. McLaughlin, M. (2016). (President of Knowledge Alliance) http://wtgrantfoundation.org/unseen- ways-research-informs-policy accessed 21/07/2016.
  11. Oakley, A. (2000). Experiments in knowing: Gender and method in the social sciences. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  12. Pattison, S., Rowland, N., Richards, K., Cromarty, K., Cooper, M., Jenkins, P., & Polat, F. (2007). Counselling in schools: A research study into services for children and young people in Wales. Cardiff, Wales: Welsh Government.Google Scholar
  13. Pattison, S., Robson, M., Hunt, K., & Dacre, V. (2011). Evaluation of the Welsh school-based counselling primary pilot: Final report. Google Scholar
  14. Ritchie, J., & Spencer, L. (2012). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In A. Michael Huberman & M. B. Miles (Eds.), The qualitative researcher’s companion (pp. 305–330). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry December, 16(10), 837–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Weare, K. (2015). What works in promoting social and emotional well-being and responding to mental health problems in schools? Advice for schools and framework document. UK: Partnership for Well-being and Mental Health in Schools.Google Scholar
  17. Welsh Assembly Government. (2008a). School-based counselling services in Wales: A National strategy. Cardiff, Wales: Welsh Government.Google Scholar
  18. Welsh Assembly Government. (2008b). The Foundation Phase Framework for Children’s Learning for 3 to 7-year olds in Wales: Crown Copyright.Google Scholar
  19. Yardley, L. (2011). Demonstrating validity in qualitative research. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 234–251). London: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Newcastle UniversityNewcastleUK
  2. 2.University of KeeleStaffordshirUK

Personalised recommendations