Using Scoping Reviews to Document and Synthesize Current Practices in School-Based Counselling

  • Belinda Harris


This chapter examines methodological issues and processes involved in conducting a scoping review of school-based counselling funded by the UK Department of Health. The aim of this chapter is to illuminate the status and prevalence of school counselling in ten geographical regions across the globe. The resulting report also provided information on the work undertaken by school-based counsellors in different countries, their level of training and theoretical orientation. This chapter begins by clarifying the policy context for, and aims of, the research project, and the role of the scoping review in fulfilling the aims. This is followed by clarifying the relationship between a literature review, a systematic review and a scoping review before focusing on the processes involved in conducting the scoping review. The author charts how experiences of undertaking a scoping review resembled the role of ‘bricoleur’ (De Certeau (1984) The practice of everyday life, Volume1. University of California Press, London). Arskey and O’Malley’s methodological framework for conducting a scoping study is used to analyse the opportunities and challenges faced in the course of the research. Further, the role of the research mentor is considered. It is argued that scoping reviews have a potentially valuable role to play in policy advocacy and policy development. The review findings informed the development of educational resources for adults working in a range of roles with, or caring for, children and young adults and also discussions about the development of a curriculum for the training of counsellors working with children and young people in the UK.


  1. Adamson, P. (2007). Child poverty in perspective; An overview of child well being in rich countries. UNICEF Innocenti Report Card 7. Florence, Italy: The UN Children’s Fund.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, S., Allen, P., Peckham, S., & Goodwin, M. (2008). Asking the right questions: Scoping studies in the commissioning of research on the organization and delivery of health services. Health Res Policy Syst, 6, 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory & Practice, 8(1), 19–32. Accessed 10/25/2016.
  4. Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beckmann, A., & Cooper, C. (2005). Conditions of domination: Reflections on harms generated by the British state education system. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 26(4), 475–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brien, S. E., Lorenzett, D. A., Lewis, S., Kennedy, J., & Ghali, W. A. (2010). Outcome of formal scoping review of health report use. Implementations Science, 5, 2. doi:  10.1186/1748-5908-5-2. http://www.implementationscience/content/5/1/2
  7. Clarke, S. (1996). The impact of national curriculum statutory testing as key stages 1 and 3 on teaching and learning and the curriculum. British Journal of Curriculum and Assessment, 1, 12–18.Google Scholar
  8. Colquhoun, H. L., Levac, D., O’Brien, K. K., Straus, S., Tricco, A. C., Perrier, L., et al. (2014). Scoping reviews: Time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(12), 1291–1294. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cooper, B. (2004). ‘Empathy, interaction and caring: Teachers’ roles in a constrained environment’. Pastoral Care, 22(3), 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooper, M., Rowland, N., McArthur, K., Pattison, S., Cromarty, K., & Richards, K. (2010). Randomised controlled trial of school-based humanistic counselling for emotional distress in young people: Feasibility study and preliminary indications of efficacy. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 4, 12. doi: 10.1186/1753-2000-4-12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Cooper, M. (2013). School-based Counselling in UK secondary schools: A review and critical evaluation. Glasgow, Scotland: University of Strathclyde.Google Scholar
  12. Davies, P. (2000). The relevance of systematic review to educational policy and practice. Oxford Review of Education Sep/Dec, 26(3/4), 365–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Davis, K., Drey, N., & Gould, D. (2009). What are scoping studies? A review of the nursing literature. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46, 1386–1400.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Daudt, H. M. L., van Mossel, C., & Scott, S. J. (2013). Enhancing the scoping study methodology: A large inter-professional team’s experience with Arskey & o’Malley’s framework. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13:48.
  15. Day, C. W., Elliott, B., & Kington, A. (2005). Reform, standards and teacher identity: Challenges of sustaining commitment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 563–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. De Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life, Volume 1. London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  17. DCSF. (2008). Targeted Mental Health in Schools- 25 local authorities set to begin new project. Accessed 16/6/2008.
  18. Department for Education and Employment. (2001). Promoting children’s mental health within early years and school settings. Nottingham, UK: Department for Education and Employment.Google Scholar
  19. Department for Education. (2016). Counselling in schools, a blueprint for the future, DFE-00117-2015(February).
  20. Department for Education, National Audit Office. (2015). Funding for disadvantaged pupils, HC 90 30th June 2015. Accessed
  21. Department of Health /DCSF. (2008). Promoting emotional health and wellbeing through the National Healthy School Standard. Wetherby, UK: Health Development Agency.Google Scholar
  22. Department of Health. (2004). Mental health of children and young people in great Britain. London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
  23. Dijkers, M. (2015). What is a scoping review?’ KT Update, 4, (1 – December). Accessed 11/30/2016.
  24. Gergen, K. J. (1973). Social psychology as history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 309–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2013). Learning from research: Systematic reviews for informing policy decisions: A quick guide. A paper for the alliance for useful evidence. London: Nesta.Google Scholar
  26. Hargreaves, A. (2003). Teaching in the knowledge society: Education in the age of insecurity. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  27. Harris, B. (2013) Scoping review of school-based counselling internationally. Rugby: BACP.Google Scholar
  28. Harris, B. (2009). ‘Extra appendage’ or integrated service? School counsellors’ reflections on their professional identity in an era of education reform. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research: linking research with practice, 9(3), 174–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harris, B., & Biddulph, M. (2000). Surviving and thriving: A small-scale study of the role of group work training in developing teachers’ professional practice. Pastoral Care in Education, 18(Part 1), 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Harris, B., & Pattison, S. (2004). Research on counselling children and young people: a systematic scoping review. Rugby: British Association for Counselling and Psychotherapy.Google Scholar
  31. Hohenshil, T. H., Amundson, N. E., & Niles, S. G. (Eds.). (2013). Counselling around the world: An international handbook. Alexandria, Egypt: Americn Counseling Association.Google Scholar
  32. Krippner, S. (2001). Research methodology in humanistic psychology in the light of postmodernity. In K. J. Schneider, J. F. T. Bugental, & J. F. Pierson (Eds.), The handbook of humanistic psychology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O’Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5(69). doi:  10.1186/1748-5908-5-69.
  34. Leuwerke, W., & Shi, Q. (2010). The practice and perceptions of school counsellors: A view from urban China. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 32, 75–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Maxwell, N. (2007). From knowledge to wisdom: The need for an academic revolution. London Review of Education, 5(2), 97–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mays, N., Roberts, E., & Popay, J. (2001). Synthesising research evidence. In N. Fulop, P. Allen, A. Clarke, & N. Black (Eds.), Studying the organisation and delivery of health services: Research methods (pp. 188–219). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. McLaughlin, C. (1999). Counselling in schools: Looking back and looking forward. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 27(1), 13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mental Health Foundation. (2006). Truth hurts – report of the national inquiry into self harm among young people. London: Mental Health Foundation.Google Scholar
  39. Nash, R. J. (2004). Liberating scholarly writing: The power of thee personal narrative (1st ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  40. Nespor, J. (2006). Morphologies of inquiry: The uses and spaces of paradigm proliferation. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19(1), 115–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pearce, P., Sewell, R., Cooper, M., Osman, S., Fugard, A.J.B., & Pybis, J. (2016). Effectiveness of school-based humanistic counselling for psychological distress in young people: Pilot randomized controlled trial with follow-up in an ethnically diverse sample. Psychology and Psychotherapy, 89(2). doi: 10.1111/papt.12102.
  42. Pederson, P. (1997). The cultural context of the American Counselling Association code of ethics. Journal of Counseling and Development, 76, 23–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schmucker, C., Motschall, E., Antes, G., & Meerpohl, J. J. (2013). . Methods of evidence mapping. A systematic review. [Methoden des Evidence Mappings. Eine systematische Ubersichtsarbeit]. Berlin, Germany: Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung.Google Scholar
  44. Pawson, R. (2002). Evidence-based policy: In search of a method. Evaluation, 8(2), 157–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pybis, J., Cooper, M., Hill, A., Cromarty, K., Levesley, R., Murdoch, J., & Turner, N. (2014). Pilot randomised controlled trial of school-based humanistic counselling for psychological distress in young people: Outcomes and methodological reflections. Counselling & Psychotherapy Research, 15(4), 241–250. doi: 10.1002/capr.12009.Google Scholar
  46. Ritchie, J., & Spencer, L. (1994). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In A. Bryman & R. G. Burgess (Eds.), Analysing Qualitative Data (pp. 173–194). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tangdhanakanond, K., & Lee, D. H. (2013). Thai and Korean Students’ perceptions about the roles and functions of school psychologists. School Psychology International. doi: 10.1177/0143034312469153.
  48. Thompson, W. (2013). School –based counselling in UK primary schools. Lutterworth, UK: BACP.
  49. The Sutton Trust. (2016). Pupil Premium Polling.
  50. Watkins, C. (1999). Personal-social education: Beyond the national curriculum. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 27(1), 71–84.Google Scholar
  51. Weinstein, D., & Weinstein, M. (1991). Georg Simmel: Sociological flaneur bricoleur. Theory Culture and Society, 8, 151–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wiggins, K. (2015) Less than half of teachers say that pupil premium works , TES, 27/11/2015.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of NottinghamNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations