Advertisement

Focusing on Context Within International School-Based Counseling Research

  • Ian Martin
  • Mohammed Mahboob Morshed
  • John C. Carey
Chapter

Abstract

School-based counseling is practiced around the globe, and descriptions of school-based counseling within different national contexts exist in the literature. Despite this, there is a lack of comparative analysis within international school-based counseling. This chapter outlines several research practices and models from comparative education that may yield new opportunities to learn about how school-based counseling develops and is practiced within specific global contexts. Implications associated with accessing deep, contextualized, comparative analyses are a theme throughout the chapter. The vertical case study is proposed as a contextually sensitive method for the comparative study of the relationships between school-based counseling policy and practice.

References

  1. Alika, H. I. (2012). School counseling in Nigeria: Past, present, and future. Philippine Journal of Counseling Psychology, 14(1), 105–118.Google Scholar
  2. Bartlett, L. (2014). Vertical case studies and the challenges of culture, context and comparison. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 16(2), 30–33.Google Scholar
  3. Bartlett, L., & Vavrus, F. (2014). Transversing the vertical case study: A methodological approach to studies of educational policy as practice. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 45(2), 131–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bertolani, J., Mortari, L., & Carey, J. (2014). Formative evaluation of “Eccomi Pronto” [“Here I Am Ready”]: A school counselor-led, research-based, preventative curriculum for Italian primary schools. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 36(3), 317–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bray, M., & Thomas, R. M. (1995). Levels of comparison in educational studies: Different insights from different literatures and the value of multilevel analyses. Harvard Education Review, 65(3), 472–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brock-Utne, B. (2007). Worldbankification of Norwegian development assistance to education. Comparative Education, 43(3), 433–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carey, J.C., & Martin, I. (2015). A Review of the Major School Counseling Policy Studies in the United States: 2000 through 2014. Center Monograph, The Ronald H. Fredrickson Center for School Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Dissemination provided by the American Counseling Association.Google Scholar
  8. Cook, B., Hite, S., & Epstein, E. (2004). Discerning trends, contours, and boundaries in comparative education: A survey of comparativists and their literature. Comparative Education Review, 48(2), 123–149. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/382619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crossley, M. (2010). Context matters in educational research and international development: Learning from the small states experience. Prospects, 40, 421–429. doi: 10.1007/s11125-010-9172-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Easton, P. (2014). Documenting the evolution of the field: Reflections on the 2013 comparative education review bibliography. Comparative Education Review, 58(4), 555–574. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/678047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jones, P. (Ed.). (2007). Global governance, social policy and multilateral education. Special issue. Comparative Education, 43(3), 321–323.Google Scholar
  12. King, K. (2007). Multilateral agencies in the construction of the global agenda on education. Comparative Education, 43(3), 377–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Le Fanu, G. (2013). The inclusion of inclusive education in international development: Lessons from Papua New Guinea. International Journal of Educational Development, 33(2), 139–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lee, S. M., & Yang, E. (2008). School counseling in South Korea: Historical development, current status, and prospects. Asian Journal of Counselling, 15(2), 157–181.Google Scholar
  15. Martin, I., Carey, J., & DeCoster, K. (2009). A national study of the current status of state school counseling models. Professional School Counseling, 12(5), 378–386. doi: 10.5330/PSC.n.2010-12.378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Martin, I., & Carey, J. C. (2012). Evaluation capacity within state-level school counseling programs: A cross-case analysis. Professional School Counseling, 15(3), 132–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Martin, I., Lauterbach, A., & Carey, J. (2015). The identification of factors affecting the development and practice of school-based counseling in different national contexts: A grounded theory study using a worldwide sample of descriptive journal articles and book chapters. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 37(4), 305–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Musa, N., & Agbaire, J. J. (2013). Methodological issues in comparative education studies: An exploration of the approaches of Kandel and Holmes. Journal of Educational Review, 6(3), 349–356.Google Scholar
  19. Raby, R. (2004). State of the field: A critical essay on the 2003 comparative education review bibliography. Comparative Education Review, 48(4), 470–475. doi: 10.1086/423357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Raby, R. (2006). 2005 Comparative education review bibliography: Changing emphases in scholarly discourse. Comparative Education Review, 50(4), 695–704. doi: 10.1086/507061.Google Scholar
  21. Raby, R. (2008). “The globalization of journals”: A review of the 2007 comparative education review bibliography. Comparative Education Review, 52(3), 461–475. doi: 10.1086/590318.Google Scholar
  22. Raby, R. (2010). The 2009 comparative education review bibliography: Patterns of internationalization in the field. Comparative Education Review, 54(3), 415–427. doi: 10.1086/653543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Samoff, J. (2008). World Bank financing of education. Comparative Education Review, 52(3), 494–496. doi: 10.1086/591161.Google Scholar
  24. Stambach, A., Raby, R. L., & Cappy, C. (2011). Changes in the field: Analysis of the 2010 comparative education review bibliography through a lens of global norm making. Comparative Education Review, 55(3), 457–472. doi: 10.1086/660296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Vavrus, F., & Bartlett, L. (2006). Comparatively knowing: Making a case for the vertical case study. Current Issues In Comparative Education, 8(2), 95–103.Google Scholar
  26. Vera, G. D. (2011). Venezuelan counseling: Advancement and current challenges. Professional Counselor, 1(1), 5–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Vulliamy, G., & Webb, R. (2009). Using qualitative research strategies in cross-national projects: The English-Finnish experience. Education, 37(4), 399–411.Google Scholar
  28. Worhuter, C. (2014). State of published research on the teaching of comparative education. Education’s Role in Preparing Globally Competent Citizens. BCES Conference Books, 12, 17–23.Google Scholar
  29. World Bank has invested approximately 45 million dollars on 1400 projects around the world. 2015. (retrieved from: http://smartereducation.worldbank.org/smartereducation/lending.html).

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ian Martin
    • 1
  • Mohammed Mahboob Morshed
    • 2
  • John C. Carey
    • 3
  1. 1.University of San DiegoSan DiegoUSA
  2. 2.University of MassachusettsAmherstUSA
  3. 3.Ronald H. Fredrickson Center for School Counseling Outcome Research and EvaluationUniversity of MassachusettsAmherstUSA

Personalised recommendations