Using Qualitative Methods to Evaluate Policy Implementation in School-Based Counseling

  • Alfred A. Adegoke
  • Foluke N. Bolu-Steve


The need to reposition school-based counselling to meet the challenges of the educational system of the twenty-first century is imperative in Africa in particular and around the globe in general. The present-day educational system in many African countries is faced with many challenges. However, if school-based counselling is properly conceived and implemented, it can serve as a tool to enhance the total development of learners. This chapter examines the rationale for using qualitative methods in policy research. It also explicated the different methods of collecting qualitative data by describing the advantages of each of the methods and also highlighting their potential limitations. The chapter also illustrated the utility of qualitative methodology in Nigeria by using an example of a policy-related research. Policies are meant to ultimately affect the lives of people. The best way therefore to assess the effectiveness of any policy is to talk to people that the policy is designed for. The different qualitative methods discussed in this chapter provide a window into an important aspect of policy assessment especially as it relates to the well-being of people.


  1. Aluede, O., Iyamu, F., Adubala, A., & Oramah, E. U. (2017). Policy, capacity building and school-based counselling in Nigeria. In International Handbook for Policy Research on School-based Counselling J. C. Carrey, S. M. Lee, B. Harris, & Aluede (Eds) Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1992). Data analysis. In R. C. Bogdan & S. K. Biklen (Eds.), Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (pp. 153–183). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  3. Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research for education. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  4. Carey, J. (2016). An International perspective on policy research: Implications for strengthening School Counselling in Nigeria. Being a Lead Paper Presented at the 41st International Conference of the Counselling Association of Nigeria CASSON. 22nd to 26th August 2016.Google Scholar
  5. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  6. Esere, & Idowu. (2011). Continuous assessment practices in Nigerian schools: A review.
  7. Flick, U (2002). An introduction to qualitative research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. C. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine.Google Scholar
  9. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1981). Effective evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  10. Kothari, C. K., & Garg, G. (2014). Research methodology – Methods and techniques (3rd ed.). New Delhi, India: New Age International Publishers Ltd.
  11. Harris, B. (2013). International school-based counselling: A review of school-based counselling internationally. British Association for Counselling & Psychotherapy & Department of Health. LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Hunt, C. (2015). Qualitative and quantitative concepts in proposal writing: Similarities, differences, and controversy. Dakota, NE: University of North Dakota press.Google Scholar
  13. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  14. Litosseli, L (2003). Using focus groups in research. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  15. Lofland, J., & Lofland, L. H. (1995). Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  16. Martin, I., Lauterbach, A., & Carey, J. C. (2015). The identification of factors affecting the development and practice of school-based counselling in different national contexts: A grounded theory study using a worldwide sample of descriptive journal articles and book chapters. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 37, 305–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McLeod, S. A. (2008). Qualitative quantitative. Retrieved on June 13, 2016 from
  18. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  19. Nakamura, R. (1987). The textbook policy process and implementation research: Review of policy research. Retrieved on June 13, 2016 from
  20. Nouria, B. & Judith, G. (2016). A guide to using qualitative research methodology. Retrieved on June 13, 2016 from
  21. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Patton, M. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Special Supplement on Qualitative Methods in Health Services Research. Dec 1999, Part II. Health Serv Res, 34, 1189–1208. Google Scholar
  23. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  24. Robinson, L. S., Shannon, H. S., Goldehar, L. M., & Hale, A. R. (2001). Qualitative methods for effectiveness evaluation: When numbers are not enough. In Guide to evaluating the effectiveness of strategies for preventing work injuries – How to show whether a safety intervention really works. Cincinnati, OH: Dept of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Public Health Service, Centre for Disease Control and Prevention. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Publications 2001‑119.Google Scholar
  25. Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (1995). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Stainback, S., & Stainback, W. (1988). Understanding and conducting qualitative research. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Counselor EducationUniversity of IlorinIlorinNigeria

Personalised recommendations