Regression Based Approaches for Detecting and Measuring Textual Similarity

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10089)

Abstract

Finding Semantic similarity is an important component in various fields such as information retrieval, question-answering system, machine translation and text summarization. This paper describes two different approaches to find semantic similarity on SemEval 2016 dataset. First method is based on lexical analysis whereas second method is based on distributed semantic approach. Both approaches are trained using feed-forward neural network and layer-recurrent network to predict the similarity score.

Notes

Acknowledgment

This work presented here is under the Research Project Grant No. YSS/2015/000988 under Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), Govt. of India. Authors are also acknowledges the Department of Computer Science & Engineering of National Institute of Technology Mizoram, India for providing infrastructural facilities and support.

References

  1. 1.
    Clarke, F., Ekeland, I.: Nonlinear oscillations and boundary-value problems for Hamiltonian systems. Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal. 78, 315–333 (1982)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rehurek, R., Sojka, P.: Software framework for topic modelling with large corpora. In: Proceedings of LREC 2010 Workshop New Challenges for NLP Frameworks, p. 4550 (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Elman, J.L.: Finding structure in time. Cogn. Sci. 14(2), 179–211 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Agirre, E., Baneab, C., Cardiec, C., Cerd, D., Diabe, M., Gonzalez-Agirrea, A., Guof, W., Lopez-Gazpioa, I., Maritxalara, M., Mihalcea, R., Rigau, G., Uria, L., Wiebe, J.: SemEval- 2015 task 2: semantic textual similarity, English, Spanish and Pilot on interpretability. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2015), pp. 252–263 (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Agirre, E., Baneab, C., Cer, D., Diab, M., Gonzalez-Agirree, A., Mihalceab, R., Wiebe, J.: SemEval-2016 task 1: Semantic textual similarity - monolingual and cross-lingual evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2016) (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Denkowski, M., Lavie, A.: Extending the METEOR machine translation evaluation metric to the phrase level. In: Proceedings of the HLT: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Los Angeles, California, pp. 250–253 (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Banerjee, S., Lavie, A.: METEOR: an automatic metric for MT evaluation with improved correlation with human judgments. In: Proceedings of the ACL 2005 Workshop on Intrinsic and Extrinsic Evaluation Measures for MT and/or Summarization, Ann Arbor, Michigan, pp. 65–72 (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Levenshtein, V.I.: Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions and reversals. Sov. Phys. Dokl. 10, 707 (1996)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Riedmiller, M., Braun, H.: RPROP: a fast adaptive learning algorithm. In: Gelenbe, E. (ed.) International Symposium on Computer and Information Science VII, Antalya, Turkey, pp. 279–286 (1992)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Huang, A.: Similarity measures for text document clustering. In: Proceedings of the Sixth New Zealand Computer Science Research Student Conference (NZCSRSC 2008), Christchurch, New Zealand, pp. 49–56 (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Aziz, M., Rafi, M.: Sentence based semantic similarity measure for blog-posts digital content. In: 2010 6th International Conference on Multimedia Technology and Its Applications (IDC), pp. 69–74 (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Achananuparp, P., Hu, X., Shen, X.: The evaluation of sentence similarity measures data warehousing and knowledge discovery. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference, DaWaK 2008, Turin, Italy, 2–5 September 2008, pp. 305–316 (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pennington, J., Socher, R., Manning, C.D.: GloVe: global vectors for word representation. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp. 1532–1543 (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G., Dean, J.: Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 26, 3111–3119 (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Jadavpur UniversityKolkataIndia
  2. 2.National Institute of TechnologyAizawlIndia
  3. 3.Instituto Politécnico NacionalMexico CityMexico

Personalised recommendations