• Sangaralingam RameshEmail author


This chapter presents a general comparative discussion on the economies of India and China. Two key points are highlighted. Firstly, the nature of business density in China and India acting as a proxy for the level of entrepreneurship. According to the World Bank (2016), new business density in India was 0.12 while in Hong Kong SAR, China it was 31.3. In terms of the level of entrepreneurship, China is at 60th position in the world with an entrepreneurial measure of 34.9; with India at position 98th in the world with an entrepreneurial measure of 24.9. Secondly, the nature of Total Factor Productivity in both countries over time. Furthermore, in the period 1950 to 2011, the percentage change in capital stock (productive assets) and Total Factor Productivity growth (proxy for the growth of knowledge) has been much faster in China then it has been in India, during the period 1950 to 2011.


  1. Amin, M., & Mattoo, A. (2008). Human capital and the changing structure of the indian economy. Policy Research Working Paper, 4576. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  2. Arnold, J., Javorcik, B., Lipscomb, M., & Mattoo, A. (2016). Services Reform and Manufacturing Performance: Evidence from India. The Economic Journal, 126(590), 1–39.Google Scholar
  3. Arora, R., & Ratnasiri, S. (2015). Economic reforms, growth and well-being: Evidence from India. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 18(1).Google Scholar
  4. Dabla-Norris, E., Ho, G., Kochhar, K., Kyobe, A., & Tchaidze, R. (2013). Anchoring growth: The importance of productivity-enhancing reforms in emerging market and developing economies. IMF Staff Discussion Note SDN/13/08, IMF, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  5. Dasgupta, S., & Singh, A. (2005). Will services be the new engine of Indian economic growth. Development and Change, 36(6).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Deheng, S. (2006). Special economic zones and economic growth in China. In On Conference of ‘Special Economic Zones: Growth Drivers of Maharashtra, June 2006, World Trade Centre, Mumbai.Google Scholar
  7. Feenstra, R. (2016). Advanced international trade: Theory and evidence. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Ghani, E., Goswami, A., & Kerr, W. (2012). Is India’s manufacturing sector moving away from cities? NBER Working Paper No.17992.Google Scholar
  9. Joumard, I., Sila, U., & Morgavi, H. (2015). Challenges and opportunities of India’s manufacturing sector. OECD Economics Department Working papers, No. 1183, OECD Publishing,
  10. Kaldor, N. (1966). Causes of the slow rate of economic growth of the United Kingdom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Kaldor, N. (1967). Strategic factors in economic development. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.Google Scholar
  12. Kaldor, N. (1968). Productivity and growth in manufacturing industry: A reply. Economica, 35, 385–391.Google Scholar
  13. Kohli, A. (2006). Politics of economic growth in India, 1980–2005: Part I: The 1980s. Economic and Political Weekly, 41(13).Google Scholar
  14. Kwok, R. Y. W. (1986). Structure and policies in industrial planning in the shenzhen special economic zone. In Y. C Jao & C. K Leung (Eds.). China’s special economic zones: Policies, problems and prospects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Liu, H., & Yang, T. (2015). Explaining the productivity gap between China and India: The role of structural transformation. The Developing Economies, 53(2).Google Scholar
  16. Loayza, N., Oviedo, A. M., & Serven, L. (2010). Regulation and macroeconomic performance. In N. V. Loayza & L. Serven (Eds.), Business regulation and economic performance (pp. 65–117). Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Park, J.-D. (1997). The special economic zones of China and their impact on its economic development. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers, Greenwood Publishing Group Inc.Google Scholar
  18. Prasad, E. (2016). This is India’s moment—Narendra Modi must not waste it,
  19. Purfield, C. (2006). Mind the gap—Is economic growth in India leaving some states behind? Washington, DC: Asia and Pacific Department, International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
  20. Qureshi, Z., Diaz-Sanchez, J., & Varoudakis, A. (2015). The post-crisis growth slowdown in emerging economies and the role of structural reforms. Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies, 7(2).Google Scholar
  21. Stacey, K. (2017). India cash recall sparks jobs crunch, says industry body,
  22. Wei, Y., & Balasubramanyam, V. (2015). A comparative analysis of China and India’s manufacturing sectors. Economics Working Paper Series, 2015/003, Lancaster University Management School.Google Scholar
  23. Wei-ming, T. (1991). Cultural China: The periphery as the centre: Daedalus, 120(2); The living tree: The changing meaning of being Chinese today (Spring 1991), pp. 1–32.Google Scholar
  24. World Bank. (2016). Doing business—Entrepreneurship,
  25. Zoltan, A., Szerb, L., & Autio, E. (2016). Global entrepreneurship and development index. Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations